1000rr said:Glyn said:1000rr said:Be careful about cancelling finance... it goes against you on your credit rating.
I bought a property 5 years ago at auction, got a loan for it over 5 years at 1.4%, and the sale fell through due to the receivers who where selling at auction made a mistake. I re-cindered the loan within the 14 days cooling off period, as i didnt need it anymore. 1 mth later, it went to auction again, so bought it, went to the bank as before for the loan over the same 5 year period, and interest went upto 12.8% as it affected my credit rating! It's classed as default apparently.
Sorry that's not true about a withdrawn finance agreement being classed as a default, a default is when you have missed a number of payments and the lender closes the account. A withdrawn agreement will not adversely affect your credit history but the lender may have risk scoring which treats you less favourably in the short term, hence the higher APR. HTH.
So the bank (lenders) told me..... I'm paying 12.8% now after recindering. Didn't miss a payment, paid the amount back in full over the phone. No interest incurred. Got hammered on the new loan. I'm talking about a loan, not finance, but was told that arranging finance and/or a loan, and not incurring interest by either cancelling ( which I did) or paying in full before the term agreed, goes against you. A bit like paying off a mortgage earlier than full term, you'll always encounter a fee some way or another.
Glyn said:1000rr said:Glyn said:Sorry that's not true about a withdrawn finance agreement being classed as a default, a default is when you have missed a number of payments and the lender closes the account. A withdrawn agreement will not adversely affect your credit history but the lender may have risk scoring which treats you less favourably in the short term, hence the higher APR. HTH.
So the bank (lenders) told me..... I'm paying 12.8% now after recindering. Didn't miss a payment, paid the amount back in full over the phone. No interest incurred. Got hammered on the new loan. I'm talking about a loan, not finance, but was told that arranging finance and/or a loan, and not incurring interest by either cancelling ( which I did) or paying in full before the term agreed, goes against you. A bit like paying off a mortgage earlier than full term, you'll always encounter a fee some way or another.
A loan is a form of finance but I know what you mean, the key thing is that a default is a serious negative marker on your credit history which stays for 6 years and all lenders can see this when you apply for credit and may make obtaining credit harder or at a higher rate. Your bank won't have defaulted your cancelled loan, what will have probably happened is that your banks internal credit scoring took into account your recent loan cancellation as a negative factor and offered you the higher rate on the new loan. Typically banks like you to wait 6 months before a new loan application is made after an initial application or cancellation but in this case they allowed it but with the higher rate.
tomscott said:I think its a bit mean insinuating nobody should buy a car without finance. It perfectly fine as long as you understand the costs.
Its a normal acceptable way now-a-days for people to have something they want and spread the cost, it doesn't mean you cant afford it but with everything a person needs and 26k being average wage in the UK, with statutory work place pensions and an average of 25k student loans for most you may bring home 16-1800 a month. Its not much, especially if you don't have a spouse.
Maybe it was different for you guys but as a 29yo whos just got on the ladder its not easy.
The UK average house cost is 272k. MOST lenders want 20% deposit off you so that's a 55k deposit (although some will still take 10%). Say you aren't living at home and renting and single, the uk average rent is 800 and you have no help from your family and with the average wage how does anybody afford to have anything but the essentials? Add on top of that bills, phone, insurance, tax, tv licence etc etc It does not leave a lot left at all!
That's without even adding a car, car insurance, tax and petrol into the equation.
How long would it take someone to get to that sort of deposit with the above? You would be broke for 5-10 years! Then an average mortgage of 30 years you will be in your 70s before its finished.
That's why many people now a days live with their parents for so long. In reality more than one in 10 adults are still living with their mother and father at the age of 40.
40!!!!! :|
Similarly, the average youth aspirations of earning more than £30,000 a year by the time they reached 31, but for 71% this dream has yet to become a reality.
The average cost in the UK of a brand new car is 18k. Which is why many cant afford to simply put 500 a month away and afford the car in 3 years time.
So I suppose what I'm trying to say is that most will accept that ye it will cost me more, but I can have what I want without having to either break into the fall back fund or wait 3-4 years to save to buy it outright.
Ive had 4 cars on finance which I'm not upset about. I ended up with good deals and without would have had to be much older to have the cars ive owned. Ive also had a couple of credit cards since I was 18 which I was advised to do to aid with credit history but used carefully. They were always paid on time and usually used for fuel etc
Credit is one of life's great Catch-22s. Especially for younger people that weren't gradually brought into the world of credit, with everyone throwing it at you left right and centre.
Let's say you're fresh out of school and want to get your first credit card. You fill out the forms and wait for the reply, only to find out a few weeks later that you've been rejected. Why? Because you DONT have a credit history. How do you establish a credit history? Well, you get a credit card, of course...
How is a bank loan granted, how is a mortgage granted, how is any finance granted? Credit history. Many of my friends have been denied simply because they don't have a credit history thinking they were smart not getting any credit at all.
The difference with car finance is that it is all in the vehicle, if people default the car is retrieved. If you take a bank loan then they will take the value of. Not specifically the car. Another reason people living on the edge take finance.
Before everyone flames me this is all hypothetical.
Obviously the absolute ends of extremes but when you break it down that's why people think - What can I afford per month.
What is bonkers is that these quoted figures are the AVERAGE costs in the UK and it is quite scary.
I suppose the amount of people who actually buy new cars over used is smaller because of the premiums you loose in the first 3 years. Many wont pay 800 for rent and will have a flat mate, not all average houses are 270k, not everyone has a student loan and many wouldn't push themselves to that extreme of financial collapse.
When you break it down similar to how a mortgage advisor does with your essential outgoings and whats left over is why many people see what can I afford per month. Obviously not everyone is in the same situation and as we are on a sports car forum that pretty much makes us all in the fortunate boat.
With my recent experience of buying a house and having to borrow nearly twice as much as my parents did 25 years ago is scary.
Anyway my post has no relevance to the thread just a reason why finance is an attractive option. To the point now where cash is not seen as positive because dealers will make money on the finance.
Whats more interesting is the trend of finance on appreciating older cars. Theres a reason Hexagon and others are buying up older Z4Ms and selling them for such a premium. They are appreciating, are nearly double what they were 3-5 years ago. They can charge a higher rate of interest as its a used vehicle, in 3 years they will not have depreciated and then will re-wrap them up in similar policies after giving poor trade in values because its an 'old car', Genius really.
pvr said:TitanTim said:There is just no way I would have slapped 38K of my cash on the salesmans desk for my M140i.
PCPs are very useful so long you get the discount and make them work for you.
Tim.
But we paid 31k for the same car / spec though with cash - so in effect, you paid 7k for the loan?
jimmybell said:Convenience, accessibility/impatience and avoid having tonnes of cash tied up in a heavily depreciating asset. Horses for courses, depends on your situation why you might find financing useful.
This topic is as old as time over on PH, and typically you get the 'finance is for poor people who cant afford the cars they buy' vs 'its a tool to enable people to do stuff' people arguing both sides, and those that have cash and hate that people with less cash/less flush can buy the same car as them.
pvr said:jimmybell said:Convenience, accessibility/impatience and avoid having tonnes of cash tied up in a heavily depreciating asset. Horses for courses, depends on your situation why you might find financing useful.
This topic is as old as time over on PH, and typically you get the 'finance is for poor people who cant afford the cars they buy' vs 'its a tool to enable people to do stuff' people arguing both sides, and those that have cash and hate that people with less cash/less flush can buy the same car as them.
My question was not regarding finance versus cash from an affordability point, but how finance could cost you less overall than paying for cash for the car. That is the bit I do not understand, i.e. who is taking the hit or is the finance company really getting the car much cheaper somehow.
original guvnor said:I'm sure I read somewhere that 9 out of 10
supercar purchases are arranged through finance.
So it's not always a case of someone not being able to afford it. I think sometimes if you have something else you can invest the capital in that will generate a decent return by financing you are getting either a free or very cheap loan.
Let's say I buy a new 991. Instead of forking out £100k cash to buy i choose to place a £30k deposit and do a PCP with balloon. The £70k initial saving in capital can be reinvested in something that will appreciate and provide an income to offset against the interest charges on the PCP I've just taken.
I can't remember who it was who said "if it depreciates lease it if it appreciates buy it". It's not a bad rule of thumb.
pvr said:jimmybell said:Convenience, accessibility/impatience and avoid having tonnes of cash tied up in a heavily depreciating asset. Horses for courses, depends on your situation why you might find financing useful.
This topic is as old as time over on PH, and typically you get the 'finance is for poor people who cant afford the cars they buy' vs 'its a tool to enable people to do stuff' people arguing both sides, and those that have cash and hate that people with less cash/less flush can buy the same car as them.
My question was not regarding finance versus cash from an affordability point, but how finance could cost you less overall than paying for cash for the car. That is the bit I do not understand, i.e. who is taking the hit or is the finance company really getting the car much cheaper somehow.
-Tom- said:I'm pretty sure that they get a healthy commission on the finance product that they've sold too, so can feed that back in with incentives.