Hi 2.2L mods?

[skrrt]

Hello everyone! I've been lurking on this forum ever since I decided I wanted to buy a z4. I'm looking at a 2005 2.2l auto at the moment as this would be my first car ever

I was wondering if it's possible to do a backbox delete on this and if it is even worth it considering it's an auto?

 

[brillomaster]

don't see why not. you wont see any power improvements, but you'll certainly get more straight six noise. a simple backbox delete will likely be pretty droney at lowish rpms, so consider that if its a daily driver and you'll also have an auto box keen to shift into higher gears too.

also - why an auto for your first car? autos are fine and all, but a z4 is a drivers car really, you'd be missing out on some of the involvement if you have it change gear for you.

 

[skrrt]

thanks for the reply I know that manuals are the way to go but I don't know how to drive one ( I've been watching youtube tutorials and I'm planning to practice) so I was thinking I can upgrade to a manual 3.0 in the near future.

 

[enuff_zed]

thanks for the reply I know that manuals are the way to go but I don't know how to drive one ( I've been watching youtube tutorials and I'm planning to practice) so I was thinking I can upgrade to a manual 3.0 in the near future.

Hello?
Are you not in the UK then? Assume if you were then you'd either have passed on a manual and would therefore know how to drive one, or passed on an auto, in which case you'd not legally be allowed to drive a manual anyway.

Anyway, my wife rives an auto 2,5i and I am tidying up a 2.2i manual.
The manual does give a few pops when I lift of, so a backbox mod would probably accentuate that.
However, the only way I can get any pops from the auto is to move the selector over to 'manual', run it up to higher revs then lift off.
Just to get a bit of noise, its a silly way to manage it and probably costs more in fuel.
So from my limited experience I'd say don't bother if you have to buy an auto.

 

[Argyll Andy]

Hello?
Are you not in the UK then? Assume if you were then you'd either have passed on a manual and would therefore know how to drive one, or passed on an auto, in which case you'd not legally be allowed to drive a manual anyway.

Hello and welcome, +1 to the above, just he beat me to asking it.

Depending upon your answer if you can only drive an auto why not miss out the 2.2 step and just go for a 3.0 auto?

If you really decide you want a manual by whatever method is required you will most likely shift the 3.0 on easier than the 2.2 when it comes to resale time

 

[brillomaster]

guessing insurance might be an issue going straight to a 3.0?

WOOO 1000th post! i'll give you a 'senior member' :telloff:

 

[skrrt]

enuff_zed wrote: ↑
Hello?
Are you not in the UK then? Assume if you were then you'd either have passed on a manual and would therefore know how to drive one, or passed on an auto, in which case you'd not legally be allowed to drive a manual anyway.
Hello and welcome, +1 to the above, just he beat me to asking it.

Depending upon your answer if you can only drive an auto why not miss out the 2.2 step and just go for a 3.0 auto?

If you really decide you want a manual by whatever method is required you will most likely shift the 3.0 on easier than the 2.2 when it comes to resale time

thanks for the responses!
I'm from New Zealand so yeah! I have been looking at a 3.0 auto as well but not sure how about the fuel efficiency tbh. i think insurance shouldn't be too bad so ill still consider it as an option.