Would you guys mind passing your views directly onto the guy from Pistonheads please (email at the top of this page)? 
RickRob said:Why didn't sniffer's posts show any details such as membership level, number of posts, location etc?
srhutch said:RickRob said:Why didn't sniffer's posts show any details such as membership level, number of posts, location etc?
I believe his account has been deleted probably by his request.
kaplaah said:I've been using mine as a daily driver since purchase at the end of Jan and it has been a joy. Whilst it's not the most comfortable, mainly due to the suspension setup, it is enough of an occasion to put a smile on your face. I actually bought the Z4M over a 996 C4S and 997 C2S Porsche.
For me, the engine is a masterpiece. I owned an E46 M3 some years back and for me it definitely feels more at home in the Z4M chassis. The aggressive chassis setup combined with the high revving engine make for an entertaining driving experience - if you push on you do need to know what you're doing. The more you drive it, the better the engine gets. It's very 'old skool racing car' in the way it drives, which is where I find it's charm; finding the power by working it through the rev range, for me I just find it extremely rewarding.
The styling is something that I personally find magnificent. Against a normal Z4 it's incredibly stealthy. I can turn up to a meeting and it's understated enough to go unnoticed, and for those who take a second glance at it and realise what it is, gains a tremendous amount of appreciation. I think it gets more recognition now than it did when it first came out. I wasn't a particular fan of it's styling when the Z4 first came out, but I now think it's a beautiful looking car. It has an intellectual beauty. I was sat at some traffic lights by Covent Garden the other day and the amount of people taking pictures left me pleasantly surprised - comparatively popular as my R8.
These car's get a lot of comparisons against TVR's, for which I've owned several, and for me I think it couldn't be more of a compliment. (I've put a picture below against my old T350 - near enough exactly the same: Wheel base, engine displacement, body type; the TVR being a little lighter, noisier and perhaps more radical looking).
The only things I'd change or would have been nice from standard; would be the suspension setup, as I think it could ride far better than it does for the road - I get the impression little engineering went towards as it is poor, and perhaps a bit more theater from the exhaust.
![]()
mr wilks said:Whoooooa forum meltdown againonly this time in a record busting 2 pages :?
Vanne said:that sounds a little "weedy" to me.![]()
![]()
Argenta said:Some great write-up!
Not too sure about "great cruiser" tho.![]()
