WLH said:flyboyaj is currently flying a KC-10 configured as a tanker for refueling.20ducks said:He drives a C17 doesn't he?
That tanker is friggin huge!
WLH said:flyboyaj is currently flying a KC-10 configured as a tanker for refueling.20ducks said:He drives a C17 doesn't he?
Aebous said:KC-10's are. IMO one of the best rides to be on when you have go cross the pond on a military jet. C-5 was nice, but somehow it just didn't do it. Maybe it was because the loadmaster wouldn't let us play football. C-17 was nice (though the jumpseats sucked) because the loadmaster let us stretch out in the bay, and various people with laptops hooked up to the aircraft and we watched movies.
Aebous said:KC-10's are. IMO one of the best rides to be on when you have go cross the pond on a military jet. C-5 was nice, but somehow it just didn't do it. Maybe it was because the loadmaster wouldn't let us play football. C-17 was nice (though the jumpseats sucked) because the loadmaster let us stretch out in the bay, and various people with laptops hooked up to the aircraft and we watched movies.
Shipkiller said:Aebous said:KC-10's are. IMO one of the best rides to be on when you have go cross the pond on a military jet. C-5 was nice, but somehow it just didn't do it. Maybe it was because the loadmaster wouldn't let us play football. C-17 was nice (though the jumpseats sucked) because the loadmaster let us stretch out in the bay, and various people with laptops hooked up to the aircraft and we watched movies.
In the 80's, I had to fly to Deigo Garcia from Norfolk in a C-141. You do not have any Idea the level of suckage that was... with a five hour layover in Mombasa, Kenya.
If I would have had a gun, I would have shot myself.
WLH said:flyboyaj is currently flying a KC-10 configured as a tanker for refueling.20ducks said:He drives a C17 doesn't he?
According to flyboyaj the KC-10 can be configured for refueling, cargo or passengers and a number of combinations of a little of each. Fully loaded the take-off weight will exceed 1/2 millon pounds...pmeloche said:WLH said:flyboyaj is currently flying a KC-10 configured as a tanker for refueling.20ducks said:He drives a C17 doesn't he?
Can KC-10 be configured for anything else other than aerial refueling? :idunno:
20ducks said:Thanks for all you and your crew are doing. I am sure proud of you!![]()
Have they got the right subject matter though :titshake:flyboyaj said:...I've got a ton of other photo's I'll post up in here when I get back...
As long as it is not AJ in more PINK shirtsWondermike said:Have they got the right subject matter though :titshake:flyboyaj said:...I've got a ton of other photo's I'll post up in here when I get back...
:hooters:

He's in touch with his feminine side :gfight:ovrkll said:As long as it is not AJ in more PINK shirtsWondermike said:Have they got the right subject matter though :titshake:flyboyaj said:...I've got a ton of other photo's I'll post up in here when I get back...
:hooters:![]()
![]()
As you can see the C-17 only handles 169k 2400 miles where the KC-10 can do 170k almost twice as far (4400 miles) and faster (Mach .825 vs the C-17's .76). Of course, the numbers are just bragging rights for us boring tanker pukes, the C-17 is much more versatile and equipped for cargo and all they gotta do is meet one of us in the air to get more gas and their range is limitless. But this is a car forum, not an airplane one, so that's enough about that.