Take Reading for example. The media were doing their best to not mention anything about skin colour or religion for fear of upsetting the minority. But.... If it were a bloke from middle England, as pale as can be, stabbing blacks or our 'followers of peace', then the headlines would have been as dramatic as they come. 'White killer' or 'Black Lives Lost'. Just ludicrous. The media are playing us (under instruction).ben g said:Nictrix said:This is it though, if you are describing someone you dont know the colour of that person will always need to come into it just like if they wore glasses, were bald, had a beard, one eye, skinny, fat, tall, short, etc.ben g said:I can't wait for the day someone is able to describe a white man or a black man as simply 'a man'.
Surely by missing out a main descriptive part is wrong.
But why do the media have to say 'black man killed by white cop' when the fact is it was 'a man killed by a cop'. The fact they're black and white had nothing to do with it. It only incites racial hatred.