survivalist said:
Apologies in advance for my ignorance, but why is revving an engine under no load a bad idea? I only ask because I once went on a factory tour for a large car manufacturer and this is exactly what was done once the assembly process was completed?
S
Survivalist
I don't believe that simply 'revving' an engine to it's limit will do that much damage per se. Of course an engine is designed to be run under load and without can be subject to excess vibration and stress Clutch, gearbox and drivetrain all damp the system. Poor analogy, but try peddling a bike fast without it's chain on and see how horrible it is.
For me the biggest damage is that this type of thing is usually done in combination with other things:
Over revving - simply as the engine can spin up so quickly it can go above it's limit and beyond it's mechanical tolerances. Easy to break things (hence BMW limiter)
Revving itself implies on and off to the limit as opposed to a progressive throtttle increase to peak and back down - unburnt fuel - ends in the cat burning, exploding and causing damage. fule washing the bores, etc. as the throttle is lifted quickly.
Cold - often done at start up when mechanical parts are not up to working temperature causing horrible wear and tear. Even in a car park the engine will have cooled internally and not expect the shock of hitting high revs instantly - very different to taking it up to peak over a second or so in gear.
Fault diagnosis - as noted above, to perhaps clear plugs, misfires, etc. resulting in high spinning ill performing engine. This can easliy cause a catastrophic failure as the engine is out of balance , damaged part stressed to listen to noises, etc.
So just my thoughts and why I'd never rev an engine and those who want to listen to the wonderful exhaust note I have, join me and the ///M's in a Welsh tunnel or listen to Andy's clips :roll: