I'm currently looking at moving to an E89, but not sure the pros outweigh the cons right now. Keep changing my mind, so perhaps some outside views might help.
The facts are:
I would be going from a 2008 E85, 2.5si sport, 31,700mi to a 2009 E89, 3.0i, 40,389mi
My E85 has the auto, the E89 is a manual.
Both are black, the E89 has red leather interior, the E85 has the black M-sport interior, MFSW etc.
E89 has no PDC, E85 does, but it's probably not a deal-breaker.
Both have sat nav, looks like the E89 doesn't have Bluetooth music streaming (I don't think that was available until later years?). The E89 is a UK import like my E85, so doesn't have the shitty Japanese-import non-functioning sat nav like most that come into the country.
I finally have my 224 wheels (arrived today) so they could go on either vehicle.
The E89 is in 'used' condition, with a ton of stone chips on the bonnet and front spoiler, a little bolster wear (to be expected), and a strangely worn steering wheel (owner's a builder, could be anything on his hands did this).
Pics of the E89:





Anyone think keeping the E85 is a better option? I know it's history for at least the last 5 years in my ownership, and I've replaced the soft top motor and fixed the DSC pump, fitted new mtec rotors, Gaptech RCH+ and so on... but am I just thinking of holding on because it's all I know?
The facts are:
I would be going from a 2008 E85, 2.5si sport, 31,700mi to a 2009 E89, 3.0i, 40,389mi
My E85 has the auto, the E89 is a manual.
Both are black, the E89 has red leather interior, the E85 has the black M-sport interior, MFSW etc.
E89 has no PDC, E85 does, but it's probably not a deal-breaker.
Both have sat nav, looks like the E89 doesn't have Bluetooth music streaming (I don't think that was available until later years?). The E89 is a UK import like my E85, so doesn't have the shitty Japanese-import non-functioning sat nav like most that come into the country.
I finally have my 224 wheels (arrived today) so they could go on either vehicle.
The E89 is in 'used' condition, with a ton of stone chips on the bonnet and front spoiler, a little bolster wear (to be expected), and a strangely worn steering wheel (owner's a builder, could be anything on his hands did this).
Pics of the E89:





Anyone think keeping the E85 is a better option? I know it's history for at least the last 5 years in my ownership, and I've replaced the soft top motor and fixed the DSC pump, fitted new mtec rotors, Gaptech RCH+ and so on... but am I just thinking of holding on because it's all I know?
) You're already sat on what will become a very sort after car - a well maintained low mileage classic