Mangozac said:
That may be because they have to customise the height of the front shock solely for the Z4M application?
I really don't know. The springs that they use are of equal lenght.
Could be that the z4m has a different lenght shock body than the e36. But piston length is I think the same, as the spring lenght is the same.
I don't own either of the cars so I can't compare it. But strut lenght is probably more of a risk than valving. Valving is 2 way adjustable (thats the slow valving), and I think that the speed valves are shimmed relatively the same and is more of an importance in little bumps/comfort, and less on roadholding around corners.
If its's a really cheap set it might be worth the risk and sell it on if it doesn't fit properly.
That would shine a lot of light on this matter. Now its mostly guessing.
No one takes the step of actually fit&try

I say go for it, but it's not my money and time put into it
But be prepared to at least buy a different set of rear springs. That stuff is also expensive at KW I suspect.
And as those are progressive springs its difficult to match them up to cheaper springs from other tuningmanufacturers.
I also don't know why they made the V3 set for the z4m progressive in the front where all other V3 sets, for e36, e46 and normal z4 are linear sets, just like the z4m clubsport set is linear.
Linear sets are less comfortable as little bumps are compliant wiht the same spring tension as bigger bumps, but the way the car dives in corners is so much more predictable imho. From a performance pov a linear spring setup is a gain imho.
Maybe linear in the rear even better too. I always thought that the rear axle is the weak spot on the e85 chassis. Especially stock its like a dog dragging his bottom over the grass, and stiffening rear springs, arb and bushings made it more solid, but when and when not it breaks out/sets a step to the side is still fairly unpredictable. The front suspension/trackarm setup is way more predictable.