Dodgy Indy or questionable BMW Policy?

Armscarf

Member
 Sheffield
A bit of a long post but I was wondering if anyone had any other info, I’ll try and keep it brief.

I sold my 2004 2.2 E85 to a friend. Recently it developed a fault and he called me up so we could take a look together. I quickly diagnosed that it was the light control module (LCM), the old unit was removed (and inspected for full diagnosis) and a second-hand part was obtained from a reputable breakers. I fitted the new LCM. It all worked but of course it initiated the odometer tamper light so I called the local Indy to book it in for a re-code, I gave them all the info that you now have. They advised us not to drive it as it could cause problems with the mileage tamper if driven too far, so we arranged for a transporter to move it to the garage at a cost of £100.

When the car arrived the Indy then told us that in the last year or so “BMW no longer supported the chassis” so a LCM re-code wasn’t possible on a salvaged unit and a new one needed to be ordered at full price (£300 plus fitting plus coding).

My friend chose to go ahead but that change seemed odd to me. I’m aware that large insurance companies seek to use reused parts and given the global focus on being green it seemed like an odd move by BMW not to allow a software re-code on a perfectly serviceable part. Not least it also would render huge volumes of parts on the second-hand market as being essentially useless. Does anyone have anymore info, questions or thoughts?
 
Yes I agree should be able to reuse perfectly good parts. However, in the case of BMW and any car manufacture they are in the market of making $$$ not saving it.
 
rdm05z4 said:
Yes I agree should be able to reuse perfectly good parts. However, in the case of BMW and any car manufacture they are in the market of making $$$ not saving it.
Agreed buddy but in this case we're talking about 2 identical bits of hardware, the new one still needed to be coded to a 2004 car. I can understand support being withdrawn especially for parts not being manufactured but this one just seems a bit odd.
 
Armscarf said:
rdm05z4 said:
Yes I agree should be able to reuse perfectly good parts. However, in the case of BMW and any car manufacture they are in the market of making $$$ not saving it.
Agreed buddy but in this case we're talking about 2 identical bits of hardware, the new one still needed to be coded to a 2004 car. I can understand support being withdrawn especially for parts not being manufactured but this one just seems a bit odd.

There is no way bmw could make this work to old parts so the Indy was being difficult I would say. Even with newer kit the parts just have to be virginised then can be recoded.
 
srhutch said:
There is no way bmw could make this work to old parts so the Indy was being difficult I would say. Even with newer kit the parts just have to be virginised then can be recoded.

Surely using Virginised parts is just being tight :-P
 
wasnt there just a thread about re-coding the LCM/tamper light, a few days ago here?? id be looking that up.

yep... here it is..

https://z4-forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=129004&start=15
 
Vanne said:
wasnt there just a thread about re-coding the LCM/tamper light, a few days ago here?? id be looking that up.

yep... here it is..

https://z4-forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=129004&start=15

Thanks for that, interesting read. :thumbsup:
 
Back
Top Bottom