A
Anonymous
Guest
D4dawg said:john-e89 said:D4dawg said:panties ???
Should we be worried?![]()
D4dawg said:john-e89 said:D4dawg said:panties ???
Should we be worried?![]()
sunnydays said:D4dawg said:Haha me?
V8 is not a purists recognised engine the bmw brand is sonoymous with the inline 6 of which S54 in z4ms are the last hence will continue to rise and hold
They are 2 completely different cars once focused upon being a track based road car and other a great gt car
Specs 0-60 4.8 Is
4.9M both of which are quicker in real life
I love these debates haha
Ps e89 was designed by 2 females
Just saying haha
Both the E92 and E85 were mass produced 10,000 ish off the top of my head. The Z4M is not a 911 Turbo Gt3 Limited edition with only 250 produced. It is a mass produced car... 10,000 + produced. This idea that they will rise is certainly interesting. It may well become a classic one day. But probably 20 years plus...... Reminds me of some users over on PH thinking their TVRs were worth circa £80k and slating the new model despite it not being out yet stating it had gone away from its roots lol!
And btw the 4.8 to 60 is for the 35i. The 35is is rated at 4.5.
Real world tests, Car and Driver 2011 35IS 0-60 in 4.3s.
The Z4M will still be at the lights trying to shift in to gear 1 lol....
sunnydays said:not a 911 Turbo Gt3 Limited edition
MrPT said:The thing that worries me about the 35is is that if I drive one I might end up liking it.
sunnydays said:The Z4M is not a 911 Turbo Gt3 Limited edition with only 250 produced. It is a mass produced car... 10,000 + produced.

breezer said:sunnydays said:The Z4M is not a 911 Turbo Gt3 Limited edition with only 250 produced. It is a mass produced car... 10,000 + produced.
Eh? You're comparing production numbers of a niche top end model 911 to the production number of ALL Z4s? That's nuts. If we reverse your position (using the same logic) and compare the niche top end Z4 to ALL 911s then there are only c.1,200 Z4MCs in RHD iirc, and over 1,000,000 911s have been made...so 911s are therefore worthless mass produced cars.![]()
srhutch said:What worries me about them is there is much more to go wrong. Too many electrical systems in cars these days. An E85/6 is much better for the home mechanic/tinkerer.
sunnydays said:breezer said:sunnydays said:The Z4M is not a 911 Turbo Gt3 Limited edition with only 250 produced. It is a mass produced car... 10,000 + produced.
Eh? You're comparing production numbers of a niche top end model 911 to the production number of ALL Z4s? That's nuts. If we reverse your position (using the same logic) and compare the niche top end Z4 to ALL 911s then there are only c.1,200 Z4MCs in RHD iirc, and over 1,000,000 911s have been made...so 911s are therefore worthless mass produced cars.![]()
Because all Z4s are Z4Ms..............
My figure of 10k was specifically for the Z4M Includes the roadster and coupe variant.
buzyg said:sunnydays said:breezer said:Eh? You're comparing production numbers of a niche top end model 911 to the production number of ALL Z4s? That's nuts. If we reverse your position (using the same logic) and compare the niche top end Z4 to ALL 911s then there are only c.1,200 Z4MCs in RHD iirc, and over 1,000,000 911s have been made...so 911s are therefore worthless mass produced cars.![]()
Because all Z4s are Z4Ms..............
My figure of 10k was specifically for the Z4M Includes the roadster and coupe variant.
The roadster and Coupe are different Variants of the Z4, ye daft muppet. If you would care to add the 911 Turbo 997.1 & 911 GT3 997.1, production figures together they are far greater than the total number of Z4Ms produced word wide. But I wouldn't bother, because that too is a pretty pointless stat, as it does not compare like with like either. :roll:
Z4MC ________ Total production __4275, ___2005-2008
Z4MR_________ Total Production__5300, ___2005-2008
911 Turbo 997.1 Total Production _19201, ___2005-2010
GT3 997.1_____ Total Production __2378, ___2006-2007
D4dawg said:mr wilks said:
Hahhahah
Nanu said:
GuidoK said:srhutch said:What worries me about them is there is much more to go wrong. Too many electrical systems in cars these days. An E85/6 is much better for the home mechanic/tinkerer.
I dont think it makes that much difference.
INPA/ISTA are needed for both cars if you want to do detailed diagnosing.
And both cars have their specific quirks. Both have potential expensive problems and potential cheap problems.
Mile for mile the n54 is probably more reliable than the s54, even taking hpfp problems, injector problems, wastegate problems and intake valve clogging into account.
srhutch said:GuidoK said:srhutch said:What worries me about them is there is much more to go wrong. Too many electrical systems in cars these days. An E85/6 is much better for the home mechanic/tinkerer.
I dont think it makes that much difference.
INPA/ISTA are needed for both cars if you want to do detailed diagnosing.
And both cars have their specific quirks. Both have potential expensive problems and potential cheap problems.
Mile for mile the n54 is probably more reliable than the s54, even taking hpfp problems, injector problems, wastegate problems and intake valve clogging into account.
I wasn't just talking about the engine. Handbrake, roof to name just two that are more complicated. But I understand the N54 is also a lot harder to work on from a diy point of view compared to the S54.
I suppose it will depend on the area, but. My Z4MC sits outside 100% of the time - and spends its time parked either on the road/drive in L25 (Hunts Cross) or in a pub car park in TW8 (Brentford).9designs said:It's already an interesting thread, as M is another option I'm thinking about to replace mine. For me it would be a short distance daily commuter car and a sunny Sunday car. Needs to live out side, do these attract thieves?
I bought my Z for sunny days and to keep the miles off the RS, so another "fun collectible" car might be a bit crazy. (Wife has sensible A3 diesel so we have most bases covered).
