j3nks79 said:You have a very strange way of looking at many things.
You are not the first to say that.
Not my fault others are less good at thinking and fail to come to the same 100% correct conclusions I do ;-)
j3nks79 said:You have a very strange way of looking at many things.
Fred Smith said:j3nks79 said:You have a very strange way of looking at many things.
You are not the first to say that.
Not my fault others are less good at thinking and fail to come to the same 100% correct conclusions I do ;-)
Simon 3.2M said:Thomas!!!!!tomscott said:Looks so much better on CSLs
![]()

:ycard:Fred Smith said:MV2s beat the 224s by a mile!
Zedebee said:ycard
yellow card warning for saying the MV2 are better than 224M.Fred Smith said:Zedebee said:ycard
??
mmm-five said:224M
Yes indeed. It was a yellow card emoji for saying the ubiquitous MV2s were better than the 224s. I didn’t give you a red because it’s a subjective assessment. I challenge you to post a poll asking which are betterFred Smith said:mmm-five said:224M
Makes sense... I never actually see emojis on this site - I dust see text like : y c a r d : (spaces added in case I actually create an emoji and this post makes no sense) and just had no idea!

Zedebee said:Yes indeed. It was a yellow card emoji for saying the ubiquitous MV2s were better than the 224s. I didn’t give you a red because it’s a subjective assessment. I challenge you to post a poll asking which are better![]()
Simon 3.2M said:I think I may be one of the few who actually prefers 224s!!
A0D302ED-DB72-4E86-9BA6-6F864AEC8C59.jpeg
I think the rears may be a little under tyred needing a slightly higher profile.


Ed Doe said:Call me a wierdo but I think the tyres look way too low-profile on the CSLs. Looks a bit 'rubber-band-y' imo