coupe or roadster?

Andy said:
omg.. is no one defending the Roadsters here ? We're just as quick..... :driving:

There's no need to Andy. It's an inferiority thing of Coupe owners that causes them to raise such issues on a regular basis :poke:
 
cj10jeeper said:
Andy said:
omg.. is no one defending the Roadsters here ? We're just as quick..... :driving:

There's no need to Andy. It's an inferiority thing of Coupe owners that causes them to raise such issues on a regular basis :poke:
Sounds about right... :P
 
cj10jeeper said:
Andy said:
omg.. is no one defending the Roadsters here ? We're just as quick..... :driving:
There's no need to Andy. It's an inferiority thing of Coupe owners that causes them to raise such issues on a regular basis :poke:
As stated by others, "it's not necessary to defend roadster owners." Roadster owners are to be recognized and complimented for the additional trouble and expense of dealing with a folding fabric top. The leaks, the squeaks, the fade, the noise, the lack of space, the ...... :poke: Ladies and gents, you know the above comment had to be responded to. But alas, we coupe owner's don't have the chance of feeling the warmth of the sun burning down on our heads and faces, or the joy of a "kiss" of dampness on our clothes and interior. :fuelfire: Yes, roadster owners are to be recognized for their commitment above and beyond the call for the ultimate driving experience. :D :thumbsup:
 
Andy said:
Z4MC 4.75secs to 60? I dont think even a happy optimistic MC owner would agree with that.... would they ? :(

I would. BMW quotes 4.9secs and they're notoriously conservative - I can believe the car is a 10th second better than they claim. The shop that installed my 3.91 gears said the car should now do 0-60 in 4.6sec easily.
 
outrun said:
There's absolutely no doubt in my mind whatsoever..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................M COUPE IS FASTER and Looks better too :poke:

The coupe's faster but how often do you see top speed? The roadster is, however, quicker.
 
The purist choice is the Coupe, to me its better looking, I've had 3 convertibles already, so I wouldn't want another

The coupe embodies everything thing I want in a car, it’s a personal choice though

I’m not sure I buy the line that “you have to be a pro driver to notice the difference” either, although I haven’t drive a roadster hard enough to know definitely

Pays ya money and all that…..
 
toplad said:
The purist choice is the Coupe, to me its better looking, I've had 3 convertibles already, so I wouldn't want another

The coupe embodies everything thing I want in a car, it’s a personal choice though

I’m not sure I buy the line that “you have to be a pro driver to notice the difference” either, although I haven’t drive a roadster hard enough to know definitely

Pays ya money and all that…..


They are both beautiful cars and each to their own which is the beauty of having choice, but your comment about 'purists choice' bemuses me. It took BMW 4 years to add a roof onto what was designed purely as a 2 seater open top roadster. The coupe added more weight and was just a later after thought.
 
Kenny P said:
I thought the coupe was lighter?

No Like for like Coupe is a little heavier

3.0i
Roadster 1385kg (///M 1485kg)
Coupe 1395kg (///M 1495kg)

Other roadster are even lighter
2.5Si 1360kg
2.0i 1295kg
 
cj10jeeper said:
Kenny P said:
I thought the coupe was lighter?

No Like for like Coupe is a little heavier

3.0i
Roadster 1385kg (///M 1485kg)
Coupe 1395kg (///M 1495kg)

Other roadster are even lighter
2.5Si 1360kg
2.0i 1295kg
Cheers for that. BMW Z4M 06 338 1485
BMW Z4 M Coupe 06 338 1424
this is the information i looked at it had the roadster as 1485 and coupe 1424. Taken from this website http://www.letstorquebhp.com/rwd.asp
 
I took the information direct from the latest BMW brochures specifications sections, for both standard adn ///M
I trust that a lot more than a website and have no idea why thye would be different. Perhaps quoting someones stripped out race version
 
That's what we're trying to say. There's only 10 kg difference in weight and, at most a tenth of a second or so in 0-60 times. In real world, everyday driving, you will NOT notice it. Pick the one you like the looks of the most and quit worrying about it. You'll like either one. :)
 
Kenny P said:
What are the quoted bmw 0-60 times for m/// coupe and roadster?Which do they have the fastest?

///M identical at 5.0 dead top 155 limited

3.0i identical 5.7 (6.0 auto) and top 155 limited

OK - satisfied they are the same according to the BMW factory issued figures??
 
Yes thankyou. I wont ask anymore questions about the performance differences. I have been reading about a gearbox problem ......... It is widely reported on owner forums that the 6-speed gearbox in the 2006 & 2007 M roadsters and coupes is prone to grinding when shifting from 1st to 2nd gear at high rpm. According to reports, there has been mixed response by BMW dealerships to this issue, some owners claiming to have received entirely-new gearboxes and others claiming their dealer calls the grinding "normal". Is this a big problem or are they just isolated cases?
 
the coupe and roadster both have the same gearbox.. i have an 06 and mine doesnt grind into 2nd..

btw.. that website is all about theoretical times, so shouldn't be used in factual comparisons. m6 0-60 in 4.1s ? :(
 
Back
Top Bottom