Clarkson on the Z4M

sammyz

Veteran
 Merseyside
Some extracts from Clarkson's ramblings over the past couple of years............. :)


On the Z4M Coupe....... :x


But it won’t. Oh sure, the engine’s a masterpiece but the traction control light flickers constantly, suggesting that the suspension is so stiff the rear wheels are actually airborne half the time. So it lurches and pitches and is generally pretty horrid. Couple this to brakes that are too sharp, a clutch that requires practice and a steering system that’s been toughened up — but not enough — and you’re left with something rather underwhelming.

It’s probably the first disappointing BMW M car I’ve ever driven.

If you want this sort of car, the Porsche Gayman is an obvious rival. It goes harder but is deeply embarrassing to be seen in. So what I’d do is buy the soft-top Z4 M instead. Or if you want something really fun for the weekend, buy a digger.


On the Z4M roadster..... :)

The thing is, though: it did work with the Z4. This was a car that, quite simply, came too soon. Because now, when I see one, I think it’s a striking crisp and modern effort; much nicer to behold than the Mercedes SLK and a million times better than the push-me-pull-you Porsche Boxster.

So when I heard that BMW was going to let its motor sport division have a fiddle, it sounded like something truly wonderful would result. I love BMW’s M cars, and when I heard the Z4 was going to get the M3’s 3.2 litre straight six I was priapic with anticipation.

The best looking two-seater sports car with the best sporting engine of them all. Theoretically the best combination since someone said: “I wonder what cranberry juice would taste like if you put some vodka in it.”

Well, I’m sorry, but Bangle said that his influence for the Z4 was the Guggenheim museum in Bilbao. BMW had plainly had enough, so it booted its American whiz-kid upstairs, where he could do less harm. And that’s a pity, because it was at this exact moment that I realised that the “flame-surfaced” Z4 is just as striking and wonderful as the building that inspired it;

Then one day I arrived at the track to find, sitting in the early morning desert sunshine, a BMW Z4-M.

Oh dear. This was a bit like sending a food critic to the best restaurant in the world and presenting him with a Big Mac. It looked all wrong, parked among the Vipers and the Ferraris and the hyper-tuned Mustangs. It looked boring and grey. A Liberal Democrat in a sea of Monster Raving Loonies.

With a limp heart and not much enthusiasm I eased out onto the track and, with my mind in neutral, set off to slither about for the cameras.

The thing is, though, that after a short while it became screamingly obvious that despite the girl-next-door looks and the miserable 3.2 litres of homo-power, this car was head and shoulders above everything else I’d driven out there.

Where a Viper or a ’Vette shouts and waves its arms about, the little Beemer just gets on with the job of going fast and telegraphing messages to the seat of your pants and your fingertips, instantly and with no ambiguity at all. Out there in the desert, it was a sniper’s rifle in a field of howitzers and mortars.
 
Interesting comments from jezza. he is funny sometimes hard to say whether he likes it or doesnt. he probably doesnt know himself.
 
The simple answer is, he's a moron!

He likes soft edged cars like big mercs, coupled with fact he's a shite driver means he's not going to like the M Coupe

He doesn't like the 911 either and that's also a great car to drive, in fact I'd be more worried if he did like it.

Notice he raved about the new fatter softed up Z4 i drive thingy
 
Classic Clarkson indeed..."3.2 litres of homo-power". Hilarious. He's a legend

You've got to take him for what he is. It's only one person's opinion. Just laugh at the colourful descriptions of the car's characteristics
 
Seems like the Coupe boys have had their feathers ruffled by Mr Clarkson :D Rather thought they would.
Here's a bit more of his Z4MC review to make you choke on your cornflakes!! :poke:

Hmmm. The first problem is that its back end appears to have been styled by someone who wasn’t concentrating. The old Z3 M coupé was deliberately ugly, like the bastard son of Gérard Depardieu and a bread van, whereas this new one’s just plain, like a supermarket checkout girl.
 
Doesn’t the fact Clarkson likes the coupe less than the roaster by your very definition of the types of cars he likes prove the coupe is in fact a better car than the roadster? :poke:
 
Who really takes much notice of anything Clarkson says? I find him funny (especially his attention seeking headline grabbing comments), but don`t take much notice of his reviews.

I read that review a long while ago. Some of his negative points are reasons some will want the car. The TC coming on often I find is complete BS. Even in damp conditions I find the car has plenty of grip considering the power.
His previous review of the MR stated the car comes into it`s own on the track I think. Obiousuly he never tried the MC on track as it too would follow the same story (it all come together on track).
If he has a problem with the clutch, he`s been driving too many of the easy for anyone to drive namby pamby performance cars availalble today :rofl:
 
I would actually agree with him on the over interference of traction control, it's far too keen to kick in even in bone dry conditions. With DSC turned off the power delivery is far smoother and eliminates that faltering effect on the acceleration when you are travelling on uneven surfaces. That said, I've found DSC to be very good in wet and icy conditions. It's just a pity there isn't a half way DSC setting as there was on the M3 CSL, CS (Mtrack mode) and even the 330, which significantly lessened the sensitivity of the system.

I wouldn't get annoyed with JC, he's more about entertainment than serious motoring journalism and he's very good at that side of his business IMO.
 
Clarkson is both a pratt & a hypocrite. Just look at the Top Gear test of the Z4M Roadster against the Porsche Boxter S. The Z4M was one of the fastest cars around Dunsfold Airfield. Nobody will ever see an ///M car like this again in their lifetime with forthcoming EU regulations. The "idiot" said this last night (correctly) when he drove the limited edition V12 Aston Vantage. Your lovely Government Ministers & MP's like their cheap (tax free) booze in Westminster but most of them don't hold a driving licence - & never will - with the Government Car Pool available for when they get pissed on your money/taxes....

Clarkson is right. And I love him for his ability to project the truth. However, he takes the piss out of us all with his basic BBC 2 salary (circa £750,000 pa) & then his salary from "The Times" of around £220,000 . He then uses his old "Time's" articles to cobble together a VERY cheap book every year & make millions!! (My wife produces the idiots books, so I know that Clarkson is taking the country for a ride so he can live in splendour whilst the rest of you rot)

Think about him.....
 
And he even takes a percentage from Top Gear's earnings. (or so i've read)

Anyway he's an ass and i never take him that seriously but i still love him. :D
 
When they had the Z4 M roadster in their track, he said he didn't like the looks of the car.. And then after some time, in another episode of the show he said "after seeing this car for a while, now I like it"... Not to mention Jason Plato and Richard Hammond just loved the car. Also, still, after so many years of Z4M's lap, there were quite a bit of car in the show with similar/more power but not many of them were able to pass Z4M's lap time. Recent example would be 370Z.

At the end, I watch the Top Gear for entartainment mostly.. I wouldn't buy a car based on their opinion, especially Clarkson's.
 
Time for top gear lap-
BMW Z4 M 1.26.0
Nissan 370Z 1.27.5
BMW M3 CSL 1.28.0
Aston Martin DB9 1.27.1
BMW M3 Saloon


here's a link for the rest of the cars- http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/show/powerlaps.shtml
 
the track is just a glorified figure of 8, so i take everything on top gear with a large pinch of salt, its entertainment at the end of the day, plus as there have been a number of stigs the times are not relevant, thats before weather is taken into account.
 
Back
Top Bottom