mmm-five said:I think the accepted wisdom says 30-40% less than a non-cat car…due to the risk you’re taking, the potential extra to insure it (less companies will quote), and the loss you’ll also see when you come to sell it.
But even then you’d want decent documentation of what the damage was and how it was repaired…as some people would take the insurance payout, but the salvage and repair it as cheaply as possible to get it off their hands as soon as possible.
If you’re buying it from the owner who had the claim, repaired it, and subsequently kept/driven it for many miles afterwards, then it’s probably a better buy than one that’s changed hand every 6 months since it was written off 5 years ago (for example).
Well, it depends on the value a bit too.bigwinn said:mmm-five said:I think the accepted wisdom says 30-40% less than a non-cat car…due to the risk you’re taking, the potential extra to insure it (less companies will quote), and the loss you’ll also see when you come to sell it.
But even then you’d want decent documentation of what the damage was and how it was repaired…as some people would take the insurance payout, but the salvage and repair it as cheaply as possible to get it off their hands as soon as possible.
If you’re buying it from the owner who had the claim, repaired it, and subsequently kept/driven it for many miles afterwards, then it’s probably a better buy than one that’s changed hand every 6 months since it was written off 5 years ago (for example).
Crikey that much
Ok- appreciate the view, helps balance the risk