Taz x said:sars, have you driven a coupe?
i have driven both, so can judge properly, oh and i drove a 3.5i
Nope never been in a zed coupe, but had an E85, and the E89 is way better than that, not as precise a drive but that's about it, everything else it does better. So yes I would say tht the E86 is a better drivers car if you're on a billiard board smooth race track, otherwise nope mine is better
See we don't agree on everything
A
Anonymous
Guest
Bing said:
I have no problem with funding the removal of implants from someone that's had a mastectomy I think that's only fair, it's just the other freeloaders I object to,
as I say It's "always someone else's fault"
yea, if its for a medical reason such as a mastectomy i totaly agree but for some 5 ft slag who wanted FF breasts, well thats their problem. bit like steroids for guys, you take them at your own risk and therefore suffer with the consequences when your heart gives out
1066 Country
My best friend's sister ( honest) has a pair of these dodgy implants currently leaking away into her body. They were fitted by the NHS after childbirth seriously messed up her breasts ,so not really for vanity reasons 100% or else the NHS wouldn't have done it.She's been ill for 2 years and after a hospital check up has had it confirmed that it's the implants making her ill. The NHS has agreed to remove and replace the implants. I think that this is fair for her, but there was a scouse lass on the radio this lunchtime who's had a boob job for vanity ,and wanted the NHS to remove them.Hers hadn't popped, and she'd had them done at a dodgy clinic which'd gone budst, but she was worried about them.Tough, if she wants them out, she should pay. If they'd popped, that's another story.Always going to be a touchy subject, but there you go.
Just for Adamski...
still, if I couoold get them I would 
I know coming in to the debate pretty late and don't know the figures, but not taking them out may also be pretty expensive for the NHS. I'd imagine there would have to be some sort of screening service for these women which would take up clinic time, probably require expensive MRI scans, etc. And for those women who did ultimately develop a cancer, there is the cost of diagnosis, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, surgery and years of aftercare (sometimes by at least three different teams of people).
It's pretty difficult to start refusing treatment for groups of people who have been seen to "bring it on themselves" and where does it stop? No Mr alcoholic, we're not sorting out your pancreatitis with an expensive ITU admission. No Mr tubby smoker, we're not going to treat your heart attack. No Mr Drug mule, you can keep that burst bag of colombian marching powder in your small intestine....
Really, the private clinics should be held accountable. After all, they had a duty of care as did the company making the implants. Both have failed.
It's pretty difficult to start refusing treatment for groups of people who have been seen to "bring it on themselves" and where does it stop? No Mr alcoholic, we're not sorting out your pancreatitis with an expensive ITU admission. No Mr tubby smoker, we're not going to treat your heart attack. No Mr Drug mule, you can keep that burst bag of colombian marching powder in your small intestine....
Really, the private clinics should be held accountable. After all, they had a duty of care as did the company making the implants. Both have failed.