BMW Z4 chassis secrets

Shipkiller

Veteran
Here is a transcript between Richard Aucock and Heinz Krusche, BMW’s chassis guru. March 22, 2009

1. Stiff Body In White
The basic bodyshell is 25 percent stiffer than before. Vital, said Krusche, for the entire driving experience. This torsional rigidity is the starting point, the vital gear in the cog. Without such a good starting point, he said, it is impossible to make cars drive well.

‘It is a big step down if the tolerances are too great.’ You can’t turn a fundamentally bad car into a good one with tweaks alone.

2. 3 Series front axle
The new Z4 uses the 2-joint front axle from the E90 3 Series (and also the various iterations of 1 Series). It’s vital, said Krusche, not least for improving feedback to steering.

With it, BMW can independently tune directional stability, steering feel and lane change stability. Curing a major flaw of the E85 Z4: its wearisome camber steer.

The rear axle, incidentally, is a development of the old Z4 (and is also on the X3). ‘There was no reason to change it,’ said Krusche.

3. Axially parallel layout electric power steering
The new Z4 also uses the axially-parallel EPAS system from the 3 Series. It means the engine isn’t sat on the steering column, so mass is reduced and a purer feel from the road is allowed. The electric motor is in parallel to the steering rack.

The EPAS system has also allowed Krusche to tune the frequencies from the road surface. Basically, you want to isolate high frequencies, but allow through low frequencies. Cumulative learning from the old, oft-criticised Z4 EPAS has allowed BMW to do this.

‘You can vary steering torque with the switch in the car,’ said Krusche. It means it can be (over) light in normal mode, meatier in Sport +.’

He’s tuned it so there is no resistance for when you need to make steering corrections – tidying up snap oversteer, for example. ‘We also vary the feel for when you come to the limit, adjusting the Servotronic function for more feedback.’

4. Greater understanding of run-flat tyres
The E85 Z4 was a run-flat pioneer, and earned much criticism for being so. The tyres’ necessarily stiff sidewalls, and greater weight, both counter ride fluidity. Almost a decades’ learning, plus BMW’s close collaboration with tyre maker Bridgestone (the rubber’s bespoke for the new Z4) mean big improvements.

The evidence of this learning is illustrated by driving the E60 5 Series alongside the newer E90 3 Series, for example. But for greatest contrast, feel how the E85 and E89 Z4s deal with impact harshness and sudden surface imperfections.

Krusche makes a further revelation here, though: again, close work with the Body In White team has led to yet more improvements. By working out the intricacies of where run-flats need compliance in the structure, and where they’ll benefit from extra stiffness, BMW’s been able to tune and filter the natural frequencies of the bodyshell to dramatically improve ride quality.

It’s all about incremental understanding, he said.

5. Change in BMW setup philosophy
Since the 1 Series Coupe, BMW has subtly tweaked its basic chassis setup to improve comfort. Spring rates are slightly softer, and dampers a little stiffer. This has been influenced, again, by knowledge from the characteristics of run-flats.

The secret to doing this well, says Krusche, is in damper tuning. By playing with internal baffles, the size of the holes within them, the rates of flow between the three internal champers – goodness, even the material of the plunger on the strut! – depth is engineered in. Fine art? Call it black magic…

Despite all this, though, Krusche says he doesn’t get the final sign off. It’s always down to the BMW Board – who, at least thrice a year, will drive test cars and give the final say-so.

Krusche can only do so much. The final Z4 we drove on the launch was not one chosen by him, but the good Dr. Ings. You have to say, all have not done a bad job…
 
Glad to see they admit the E89 was built with comfort as the most important thing.

Proves they are getting out of the sports car market!!
 
2 Zero said:
Glad to see they admit the E89 was built with comfort as the most important thing.

Proves they are getting out of the sports car market!!

Yep.

I LIKE the way my car feels every bump-that's information. When I want to cruise, I drive the X5 or the F150 Lariat.
 
gannet said:
Good to see they admit the ride with the original runflats was shocking too...

Yet they stick with Bridgestone instead of the superior Michelin PS ZP's.
 
Yeah, but how much is Bridgestone changing the tire? It may be totally different now that the tire that came on the first Z4s.
 
They haven't made anything to replace the RE050A yet so they will likely have the same old 'ride like a cartwheel' bridgestones :P

http://www.bridgestone.co.uk/bfe/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=0488521cd897b110VgnVCM1000005101a10aRCRD
 
but I'm wondering if they have made any changes at all to the sidewall without changing the model designation (keeping the same tread pattern?)
 
Smokin said:
2 Zero said:
Glad to see they admit the E89 was built with comfort as the most important thing.

Proves they are getting out of the sports car market!!

Yep.

I LIKE the way my car feels every bump-that's information. When I want to cruise, I drive the X5 or the F150 Lariat.

Same here.

Going from RFT to non-RFT, I saw road speeds increase quite alot on lumpy roads because it just felt more planted and moved around less, but I felt that in a way that was moving in the wrong direction, making it smoother and faster with less effort just isn't a sports car ethos.
Of course, I think good non-RFT's are fine if they are still sharp like the OEM Bridgestone RFT.

But to purposefully remove traits that involve you and demand driver attention, clearly points to a direction that is more GT car than sports car.

I did loads of fun narrow back-road miles today with the roof down in my Z4 and loved every minute of it. Had I wanted a squishy soft, fluent and fast GT car I'd just get the SLK as it's probably better :D

Dave
 
No wonder the RFTs felt better on the E89 than on the E85.

With that said... I'd still swap 'em out at the first instant.
 
Back
Top Bottom