I'm about to put my car up for sale, but before I do I just want to check I have my facts straight regarding the warranty.
Currently my car has a BMW Insured warranty, comprehensive cover with no excess and breakdown cover, which is effectively an extension of the AUC warranty that I bought it with. It's fully paid, so transferable to a new owner.
Now a few years ago I remember that the rules were that any BMW that fell out of warranty could then not re-enter the scheme. If that's the case then the fact that my car has a warranty is a decent selling point. However if a potential purchaser can buy a private sale car with no warranty and then apply for and receive warranty cover from BMW, then the benefit of mine having a warranty is minimal. Can anybody confirm because I can't find the answer?
Secondly my car doesn't have sat nav. I should point out that this isn't my fault, since I didn't spec the car in the first place. Anyway some people say that this means my car should be £500 less than a car with it, assuming everything else is equal. Scandalous if you ask me, but I'm not about to argue with market forces. So, does that sound about right or are you going to tell me it's £1000?
Cheers
James
Currently my car has a BMW Insured warranty, comprehensive cover with no excess and breakdown cover, which is effectively an extension of the AUC warranty that I bought it with. It's fully paid, so transferable to a new owner.
Now a few years ago I remember that the rules were that any BMW that fell out of warranty could then not re-enter the scheme. If that's the case then the fact that my car has a warranty is a decent selling point. However if a potential purchaser can buy a private sale car with no warranty and then apply for and receive warranty cover from BMW, then the benefit of mine having a warranty is minimal. Can anybody confirm because I can't find the answer?
Secondly my car doesn't have sat nav. I should point out that this isn't my fault, since I didn't spec the car in the first place. Anyway some people say that this means my car should be £500 less than a car with it, assuming everything else is equal. Scandalous if you ask me, but I'm not about to argue with market forces. So, does that sound about right or are you going to tell me it's £1000?
Cheers
James
Listening PVR?