BMW Girls (NSFW)

The pointer(arrow) is in the way.
getImage
 
PaulN said:
DHK said:
...and slowly but surely this web site turns to a porn web site. :evil:

I cant see how that can be a bad thing................ unless theres a joining fee! :oops:


I wonder what the servers rules an regs are on these pics? I know a forum I used to frequent got their pee pee slapped for threads like this.
 
PhilDZ4 said:
Damn Aebous, that post hurt. :(


I know I know....and I love these posts, but I'd like to see them every day and not have them pull the site for violation. Which is what I'd love to do to those ladies.
 
Oh coooome on Aebous, be positive ... you can google these pictures out... they might as well take the entire Google down.
Well, on that happy note... lets move on.

1168689234_bmw_girls_13.jpg

1168689273_bmw_girls_16.jpg

1168689375_bmw_girls_25.jpg

my fav
1168689423_bmw_girls_29.jpg

1168689564_bmw_girls_38.jpg

1168689758_bmw_girls_47.jpg

1168690062_bmw_girls_64.jpg

1168690249_bmw_girls_77.jpg

1168689591_bmw_girls_40.jpg
 
DHK said:
Oh coooome on Aebous, be positive ... you can google these pictures out... they might as well take the entire Google down.
Well, on that happy note... lets move on.

1168689423_bmw_girls_29.jpg

1168690249_bmw_girls_77.jpg



Ahhh watch the paintwork............. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Aebous said:
I wonder what the servers rules an regs are on these pics? I know a forum I used to frequent got their pee pee slapped for threads like this.

Ok.. it's my server so I make the rules, so don't worry about it from that angle. My take on it from the perspective of the server is "as long as it is legal" etc.

From the angle of the forum it is a bit more complicated, and I think there will have to be some policy change just to cover ourselves. I will make an announcement soon but basically there will have to be a line drawn between "glamour girls" and "porn".

The reason for this is that while I don't personaly take issue with the pictures I have to be seen to be "protecting the visitor" in terms of exposure to that sort of thing. That is why on x-rated content websites you will see an age check on the home page (confirm you are over 18 etc). We obviously do not want to have to do this, so we will have to cool it a little.

We do mark all posts like this with NSFW which is a good start :) The only thing is when you click on "new posts" I dont want to see 25 NSFW threads, again from a new visitor point of view it doesnt look good. An example of this would be the "Booty Time" threads... no problem with the posts, but can you just update the same thread and maybe edit the title?

I am not going to do anything just yet... I am interested to hear what you guys all think.

Jim
 
well I'd love to comment but my iPhone has crashed 4 times while trying to view this thread, not convinced when I was under 18 I'd have had the patience to persevere to this point... :lol:
 
sp3ctre, Fearless Leader! I feel that glamor pics are just fine. I would suggest that the pics posted are wearing something to cover the pubic area for sure. I would personally also suggest that the nipple-areola complex is also covered.

Shots with the above parameters look sexy - a little covered up.

Just my C$ 0.02. Okay - now it's time to tell me off for being a party pooper.
 
That's exactly what I was suggesting... :)

enfield said:
sp3ctre, Fearless Leader! I feel that glamor pics are just fine. I would suggest that the pics posted are wearing something to cover the pubic area for sure. I would personally also suggest that the nipple-areola complex is also covered.

Shots with the above parameters look sexy - a little covered up.

Just my C$ 0.02. Okay - now it's time to tell me off for being a party pooper.
 
It's no question that we have crossed over a bit of a line with a few of the posts in this thread. However, rather than some set of draconian rules that define what specific piece of anatomy is or isn't considered acceptable, I suggest that we all just apply a bit of common sense to the matter. In fact I see nothing wrong with occasionally pushing the envelope in a clearly marked NSFW thread from time to time, provided that the moderators keep it in check if it starts to get out of hand. In other words, lets try to be respectful and reasonable.

I am actually more uncomfortable with some of the avatars currently in use, as these appear unfiltered on every page. I rarely ever bring up the z4-forum at work because of this. When putting up an avatar, I would suggest that you ask yourself if you would feel comfortable having your young daughter (or niece) walk in on you looking at this picture. If you don't have a young daughter or niece, please be considerate of those of us who do.
 
Oh, look what I started. Sorry. I think the NSFW is fine, I just didn't know server rules. After all, NSFW is Not Safe For Work/Wife. It applies in both instances. Believe me I have no problem with looking at nekkid girls, just ask the strip club owner (porn too :P ) I just didn't want us to get in trouble. Course always better to beg forgiveness than ask permission right?
 
enfield said:
sp3ctre, Fearless Leader! I feel that glamor pics are just fine. I would suggest that the pics posted are wearing something to cover the pubic area for sure. I would personally also suggest that the nipple-areola complex is also covered.

Shots with the above parameters look sexy - a little covered up.

Just my C$ 0.02. Okay - now it's time to tell me off for being a party pooper.

I agree with enfield. I like it, no doubt, but this isn't the place for it. I vote for the tits and groin to be covered -- especially on dudes :?

Oh, yea, and out of respect for our female members and visitors too.


On a different note... I'm in love - again! :wub:
1168690062_bmw_girls_64.jpg


Man, too bad my x-wife decided to be a slut - she would have looked f-ing sexy on the hood of my car! Oh, well, she's the one missing out... b!tch! :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom