There’s nothing that suggests 50/50 is a holy grail…Thank you for making my point, you class the 4-pot as handling better because the engine is further back and then state no evidence that this becomes wayward, which I didn't state at all, rather that the closer to 50/50 is perceived as better and thus the 30i should be ahead of the 4-pot and not the other way around. Again your marking is subjective and where the 4-pot is concerned, biased too.
John I respect your views..my views on some of your points are different…Three points as I see it:
1. You can’t find a single front engined rear wheel drive car that shows rear weight distribution causing wayward tends which I’m taking as handling, I can, the E89, they’re s**t out of the box, understeer to oversteer mid corner due to rear weight distribution no matter the engine, with the 4 pot engines being worse than the 6 pots.
2. Why are you listening to what the American press say about handling, they can’t make a car go around corners for love nor money.
3. If you can observe how folks on noons are coping with Scottish roads through your mirrors then you’re obviously able to have out of body experiences and float around studying drivers and still pilot your own car, or going to end up in a big f**k off ditch pretty soon….![]()
Thnx for the encouragement…You've almost got it right - just a few changes needed & you will have it.
Custard yellow as +3 --- obviously you meant -3
Adaptive dampers -3 --- if they are working they are surely +3
35is special exhaust - not mentioned (but should be) +5
326m wheels -3 --- get non run flats on em --- nicest wheel on a z4 so +3
For perseverance in the face of adversity, I'd give you +1 personally.
But for being wrong I would then subtract -2.5
Duh.
This would have been so much better in the shape of a sudoku.
Or perhaps 3d printed.
I think a F Type is an excellent idea…with hindsight I wish I bought an F Type rather than the 35is..This has gone well!
If I was a newbie reading this thread, I would have left and bought an MX5 by now. Or an F type, or even a poor man's Porsche!![]()
John I respect your views..my views on some of your points are different…
When you drive for say 200 miles for say 5 hours on over 200 events with between 4 and 12 Z4s you a mass a wealth of observations…compared to a guy on Facebook who has had his one E89 for 9 months, drives in the Home Counties and has never been on a run I would suggest my insights have more supporting evidence / observations..
Enjoy your day..
Come and do a couple of NC500s with us...then we can review your comments!I’ve led a run in the Peak District and at no point did I spend anymore than a quick glance at what was happening behind me, and when I did it was solely to quickly ascertain if anyone was still with me; I hadn’t the time nor inclination to ‘Observe’ how others were driving, nor could I see more than one car which was directly behind me, the rest of the time I was looking forward so as not to crash, you simply don’t have the time or vision to see anyone except the car immediately following you to make any observations at all as to how they’re coping with the roads, so I’m calling bullshit on you being able to make your statement.
Hope you had a good day too.
…..and a 50/50 weight distribution absolutely IS the holy grail, how can it not be…?![]()
What for…? Won’t make any difference where you do a run you can’t observe what’s happening behind you to make your statement.Come and do a couple of NC500s with us...then we can review your comments!
So end of this commentary!
I’ve not actually tipped anything into it to see how it works..I’ll try a few different ones…my guess a 30i MSport auto or a late 28i MSport autoVery good, informative and interesting. Thank you for that work.
My latest would have scored very high but is let down by being a pre-2015 28i.
However, I won't be using it until the New Year when I intend to get the various upgrades done as a preventative measure eg. timing-chain, water-pump and thermostat etc.
What is the highest scoring model, BTW?
Thanks again.![]()
Hi there ..of course you’re not being a dock…reasonable questions ..I'm not trying to be a dick, but (yes, I know starting a sentence that way almost certainly means I am being a dick) all you're really doing is sharing your subjective opinions that the smaller-engined E89s handle much "better" and that the 35is is really unreliable and expensive to maintain, but you've dressed those opinions up in a spreadsheet to make it appear somehow scientific.
Either use objective data to determine the rankings, or just call it what it is - your opinion. Your opinions are useful given your experience with these cars, but it is still just opinion, not fact.
I'm also not convinced that a ranking system is particularly helpful - 1st v 2nd is meaningful if 1st is 100% better than 2nd, but if it's only 1% better then it probably makes no difference to anybody. Quantifying the advantages and disadvantages is what's important, albeit much more difficult.
This is why, IMO, every 'car review' on youtube, or even in car magazines, is pointless.I like the spreadhseet - I just feel deep down it is utterly pointless.
For me - the buying decisions were to get a colour I liked in the top spec, with the biggest engine & most options. I had to be able to insure it within my own budgets, and it needed to fit the shopping in the boot. Needed some kind of auto due to living near London & traffic jams are a drag.
Performance around the nuremburgring or NC500 is irrelevent to me - I'm never going there. 50:50 balance being better? Didn't give it a second thought. Imagine having that conversation with my wife - lol.
I can live with maintenance, and have my eyes open with regard to costs.
Every other nuance just didn't play into the decision.
Everyone has their own list that is formed by their own lives & budgets.
A better mechanism for some kind of score sheet would be to decide what matters to you, then set up your own matrix & not worry too much about the opinions of online self appointed experts. (including me)
This is absolutely and the reality of things when one is making a decision to buy.I like the spreadhseet - I just feel deep down it is utterly pointless.
For me - the buying decisions were to get a colour I liked in the top spec, with the biggest engine & most options. I had to be able to insure it within my own budgets, and it needed to fit the shopping in the boot. Needed some kind of auto due to living near London & traffic jams are a drag.
Performance around the nuremburgring or NC500 is irrelevent to me - I'm never going there. 50:50 balance being better? Didn't give it a second thought. Imagine having that conversation with my wife - lol.
I can live with maintenance, and have my eyes open with regard to costs.
Every other nuance just didn't play into the decision.
Everyone has their own list that is formed by their own lives & budgets.
A better mechanism for some kind of score sheet would be to decide what matters to you, then set up your own matrix & not worry too much about the opinions of online self appointed experts. (including me)