ESP said:
Falken's
In recent years and cars ill almost certainly go for
Falken's
Failing that
Kumho's or
Toyo Proxes.
I have previously bought, tried and tried and read and researched and asked and re-read about
Goodyear Eagle F1, and
Michelin Pilot and i really struggle to see any justifications of the price over performance gains. With out the advantage of my own scientifically controlled research ill stick my neck out and say they dont perform any better in wet conditions than Falken's.
You better wind it back in because you're wrong. :!:
Falkens are OK in the wet but F1s are noticeably better.
Proxes are like plastic in the wet compared to F1s.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 I have also just got and they are at least as good as the F1, better I believe.
In addition to my own experience I give you the following quotes from journalist testing:
'The Falken was the slowest tyre around the dry handling circuit, and by no small margin. We could forgive it for that if it shone in the wet handling test, but it didn’t. It came seventh. The Falken also lost the dry braking test, but to its credit it did finish fourth in wet braking, bettering some big names.'
'Rather like the Yokohama, the Goodyear earned its podium position by showing well across the various wet and dry tests. There are other tyres here that give sharper steering response and more outright grip on a dry road – most notably the Michelin – but only the winning tyre offered a broader spread of ability across wet and dry conditions.'
'In fact, the Proxes never placed higher than eighth in any test, and in two dry tests, the autocross and the skidpad, the Toyo finished last, trailing the top finishers by significant margins. In some tests it felt better than it actually was performing, but overall, Geswein noted it was "soft and imprecise" and didn't "feel like a sport tire."'
I could go on but there's no point.