A few onboard videos

D

dario

Senior member
I thought that I would post up some of my customer videos to see what you guys thought about the quality.

The video conversion is carried out by some aftermarket software which converts .AVI to .MP4 for use with youtube video.

feedback would be appreciated.

Don't forget to watch in Youtube HD if your bandwidth will handle it.

[youtube]RxLuodn3z7M[/youtube]


[youtube]6Mcz5d8cQ-Q[/youtube]


[youtube]2R9HJ6IThtM[/youtube]


[youtube]Yrs8KuNgydY[/youtube]


[youtube]XDOOmVHW-O4[/youtube]


[youtube]Hvm5vYVj2Kk[/youtube]

Dario
 
The video quality is actually quite good, focus and lighting are excellent and there are no motion artifacts to be seen. The conversion from interlaced (probably a 1080i native resolution camera?) to progressive-scan (720p) is extremely poor though... but this might be the video conversion software's fault, not the camera's.
 
jhbuining said:
The video quality is actually quite good, focus and lighting are excellent and there are no motion artifacts to be seen. The conversion from interlaced (probably a 1080i native resolution camera?) to progressive-scan (720p) is extremely poor though... but this might be the video conversion software's fault, not the camera's.
Click to expand...

What the ......! :o They look great to me and especially the Ring footage. Good stuff Dario am now tempted to rent the kit on my next Ring trip. :thumbsup:
 
Here's an example shot. Look at the Porsche passing on the left hand side. The edges are all jagged. Those are serious deinterlacing artefacts.

OnboardInterlacing.jpg
 
ranski said:
Got to be the radical for me - great vid's
Click to expand...

The Radical Is good footage.

But look at the gear change.

he is pushing forward to go up the box and pulling back to go down.

Its totally counter intuitive and he fluffs it now and again. BTW its not his car, but a friends.

Dario
 
jhbuining said:
The video quality is actually quite good, focus and lighting are excellent and there are no motion artifacts to be seen. The conversion from interlaced (probably a 1080i native resolution camera?) to progressive-scan (720p) is extremely poor though... but this might be the video conversion software's fault, not the camera's.
Click to expand...

Its not bad for H.264 Xvid MP4. then converted to MP4 @720p, then youtubed.

Dario
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom