Z4M-2006 said:If they do a 718 Spyder RS that will be the thing to have...
Sod all the 911's....
I'd agree were it not for the new gt3 series moving to double wishbone at the front, a big step from the macpherson arrangement really.Z4M-2006 said:That will be the thing to have...
Sod all the 911's....
Chris Harris tweeted "Intake noise"RedUn said:Lovely car, carbon airbox behind your head must sound the nuts! :evil:
I have read £100K Overs initially. Whilst not a numbered car, the production will be limited with an allocation of 1 car at most per OPC in Q4 2021 and not alot more next year. I have spent an inordinate amount of time on the configurator and I am smitten. Unfortunately even if I could afford one I would never get a build slot in a month of Sundays.Angelus666 said:It’ll be a lovely thing. I wonder what the overs will be for it in the first 6 months, surely a cayman can’t be £200k… :?
RedUn said:I think the that baby is double wishbone up front as well Tom, seem to remember it from one of the million videos posted everywhere in the last month! :lol:
Lovely car, carbon airbox behind your head must sound the nuts! :evil:
Ahh bugger! Suppose they can't give it everything!TomK said:RedUn said:I think the that baby is double wishbone up front as well Tom, seem to remember it from one of the million videos posted everywhere in the last month! :lol:
Lovely car, carbon airbox behind your head must sound the nuts! :evil:
No it's not, which is why the GT3 is still really the car to have imo. But I wouldn't say no to the gt4rs, I have a half chance of getting my hands on one, let's see.....
“The GT3 always has huge competition around it. Everybody's trying to match the GT3’s status, its value package and its performance on the track. So we are eager to give the GT3 everything we can to let it stay on pole position, like the double wishbone front axle, the rear-wheel steering. It has all these gizmos that makes the car really fast,” Preuninger explains.
john-e89 said:Z4M-2006 said:If they do a 718 Spyder RS that will be the thing to have...
Sod all the 911's....
Fixed and no thanks necessary.....![]()
Firstly it is still (and always will be) a 'poor man's 911'.Z4M-2006 said:That will be the thing to have...
Sod all the 911's....
Hmmm not sure about that. Some people opt for a Cayman over a 911 :fuelfire:Pondrew said:Firstly it is still (and always will be) a 'poor man's 911'.Z4M-2006 said:That will be the thing to have...
Sod all the 911's....
Admittedly the Cayman has come on leaps and bounds in recent incarnations, but still a 911 'light'.![]()
Secondly, there is no need for an apostrophe in 911s. It is a plural, plurals don't have them. No need to thank me![]()
I was going to add, the poor man's 911 quotes died about 10 years ago now. .. :tumbleweed:Boyo said:Hmmm not sure about that. Some people opt for a Cayman over a 911 :fuelfire:Pondrew said:Firstly it is still (and always will be) a 'poor man's 911'.Z4M-2006 said:That will be the thing to have...
Sod all the 911's....
Admittedly the Cayman has come on leaps and bounds in recent incarnations, but still a 911 'light'.![]()
Secondly, there is no need for an apostrophe in 911s. It is a plural, plurals don't have them. No need to thank me![]()
Pondrew said:Firstly it is still (and always will be) a 'poor man's 911'.Z4M-2006 said:That will be the thing to have...
Sod all the 911's....
Admittedly the Cayman has come on leaps and bounds in recent incarnations, but still a 911 'light'.![]()
Secondly, there is no need for an apostrophe in 911s. It is a plural, plurals don't have them. No need to thank me![]()