6 months with an EV

axelleveau said:
Everyone is giving 8-10 years warranty on batteries, ageing is a non-issue.

Well only after 8 or 10 years!

Does that mean outside of the warranty period new batteries would make the car uneconomic to repair?
 
My wife and I have both converted over to EV’s for our daily drivers and I did quite a lot of research before making the jump a while ago with our first one, a BMW i3.

Are EV’s perfect? No. Are they going to be the answer for everyone in their present form? No. But the more I researched the more I realised just how much Daily Fail click bait bullshit was being peddled about electric cars. Things like they all catch fire, batteries are scrap after 5 years, they can’t recycle batteries etc, all completely untrue.

To answer the question about life expectancy of batteries I’ll ask you consider this. With the exception of a couple of manufacturers the engine in a a brand new car comes with a 3 year warranty. Millions of people buy ICE cars every year without ever thinking “ this thing only has a 3 year warranty I guess I’ll need a new engine when the warranty runs out” but people believe that in 8 years time an EV battery will just suddenly die. Why is that? I can absolutely guarantee nobody has ever thought that about anything they have ever purchased, tv’s, Phones, computers, mp3 players the list is almost endless.

But lets for a moment say that you’re one of the unlucky ones and your battery does die just outside the 8 year warranty period. Would you head back to the main dealer and buy a brand new battery and then pay extortionate main dealer rates to have it installed? No of course you wouldn’t, just the same way you wouldn’t head back to the main dealer for a brand new engine for your ICE car. What you would do and what everybody does is get it repaired buy a trusted independent for a fraction of the cost.

Yes batteries can be repaired by have the dead cells replaced.
 
Those original Prius cars still drive around, not heard about batteries on those (hybrid of course but surely if they had all died we would have heard)
 
From what I read the batteries on EVs, like any battery device take your mobile phone for example, degrade over time. Something like 2-3% a year by all accounts depending on use and brand etc. So after ten years yes your battery wont 'fail' but the range on your EV if it were 200 miles will now be around 140-160 miles for example.

I would definitely consider an EV for the boring driving, the about town driving picking up my son from football etc. the only problems I have are that I live in zone 3 London we have no driveway and often cannot park outside our own house - charging will be a complete hit and miss. There are charging bays in roads about 10 mins drive away but they are often full - I noticed EV cars often parked there for over 24 hours they use it as free parking which is annoying. To own an EV where I live I would have to take into account that I am going to have to drive past a petrol station and out to find charge points and sit there for however long waiting for it to charge.

Its ironic really that the best place to own an EV is more suburban areas, where driveways are more accessible but also less densely populated and probably not as prone to pollution issues. In the city where they are needed most, is the hardest place to own them unless you are very wealthy and lucky enough to own a big house.
 
The Tesla model of charging would probably work there, i.e. if your car is full and it is still attached, then it starts charging you for parking there.

If you are not attached, then the EV would risk a parking fine like any other car parked there.
 
I'm still not convinced on their environmental credentials to be honest and to me they pollute in different ways and just as environmentally unfriendly, having said that it will always be the case with cars. I would agree their ideal role is popping down to the shops and being able to charge at home. With no decent charging infrastructure I can't see how they will ever become mainstream unless you can charge in less than 5 minutes. There is no way I would wait hours at a charger if you can find one that isnt already taken or actually works. It's just the cost of the things if buying new which is a joke and looks like retained value is poor.

As James May said, anything with batteries is rubbish :lol:

Tim.
 
There has been quite a few investigations in terms of the life time environmental impact, I think the general consensus is once you have done 30-40k miles in a typical EV you are then being much 'greener' than an ICE car in terms of pollutants etc. EV batteries can be repurposed at the end of their useful lifecycle, and infrastructure will come with the uptake of EV cars as they become cheaper to own. It just takes time. Appreciate as I cited that at the moment practically owning an EV is not an option for me but that doesn't mean it wont be in the future. Charge times will come down, innovation around them will be constantly moving, batteries smaller, more efficient, quicker to charge etc. will all come.

The key really is to switch from burning stuff to generate electricity and building wind farms/solar etc. more renewable energy resources.
 
coldel said:
From what I read the batteries on EVs, like any battery device take your mobile phone for example, degrade over time. Something like 2-3% a year by all accounts depending on use and brand etc. So after ten years yes your battery wont 'fail' but the range on your EV if it were 200 miles will now be around 140-160 miles for example.

I would definitely consider an EV for the boring driving, the about town driving picking up my son from football etc. the only problems I have are that I live in zone 3 London we have no driveway and often cannot park outside our own house - charging will be a complete hit and miss. There are charging bays in roads about 10 mins drive away but they are often full - I noticed EV cars often parked there for over 24 hours they use it as free parking which is annoying. To own an EV where I live I would have to take into account that I am going to have to drive past a petrol station and out to find charge points and sit there for however long waiting for it to charge.

Its ironic really that the best place to own an EV is more suburban areas, where driveways are more accessible but also less densely populated and probably not as prone to pollution issues. In the city where they are needed most, is the hardest place to own them unless you are very wealthy and lucky enough to own a big house.

You see this is a classic example of one of the myths about batteries that perpetuate on the Internet. The battery in your phone is completely unmanaged so does degrade by around 2-3% per year. In battery terms things like phones get abused, almost always being charged to 100% (ofter daily), almost always rapid charged, no thermal management system to stop them getting too hot or cold.

Not of these things are true with regards to EV batteries, with the exception of no thermal management on the early Nissan Leaf. EV batteries also have a built in buffer, our Skoda has an 82 kwh battery, only 77 kwh can be used. This stops the battery being stressed by being charged/depleted to its maximum.

Tesla batteries have been around the longest and their average drop off is 1-1.5% per year but then levels off to almost 0 when it gets to 90% of its original capacity. There are Tesla taxi's out there with 500,000 miles on the original battery.

I do agree that the infrastructure in urban areas is not good enough, but that's not an EV issue that's a government/local council not getting their s**t together issue. If they want us all to get on board then they need to provide infrastructure for people who can't charge at home.

Some councils are better than others. Quite a few are trialing a type of cable channel that will allow a cable to be run across a footpath if for example you live in a terraced house. I know I doesn't stop someone else parking in front of your house but it all helps.

Don't forget we've had around 140 years of refinement gone into building ICE car infrastructure, we've only had around 10 years for EV's.
 
Worcester_spoon said:
I don’t like milk floats.

If you’re being glib for the sake of example implying EV’s are a bit dull to drive then I 100% agree. But then my Skoda superb was, and so was the Kia I had, oh and my wifes VW Golf, most cars are.
 
Dave1971 said:
buzyg said:
pvr said:
On the ID the battery warranty is 10 years, no idea about other makes

Most people drive cars that are more than 8 years old. :wink:

Yes and almost all of them only came with a 3 year warranty and they sill work just fine :P .

Many will have required new batteries to keep them working Just Fine. <£100 for most small ICE cars. Would be interested to know the cost of a new battery pack for a Nissan Leaf, for example? :P
 
I think the main difference is that not all engines need replaced after a certain amount of time or miles but you can guarantee that the batteries will need changed.
 
Dave1971 said:
coldel said:
From what I read the batteries on EVs, like any battery device take your mobile phone for example, degrade over time. Something like 2-3% a year by all accounts depending on use and brand etc. So after ten years yes your battery wont 'fail' but the range on your EV if it were 200 miles will now be around 140-160 miles for example.

I would definitely consider an EV for the boring driving, the about town driving picking up my son from football etc. the only problems I have are that I live in zone 3 London we have no driveway and often cannot park outside our own house - charging will be a complete hit and miss. There are charging bays in roads about 10 mins drive away but they are often full - I noticed EV cars often parked there for over 24 hours they use it as free parking which is annoying. To own an EV where I live I would have to take into account that I am going to have to drive past a petrol station and out to find charge points and sit there for however long waiting for it to charge.

Its ironic really that the best place to own an EV is more suburban areas, where driveways are more accessible but also less densely populated and probably not as prone to pollution issues. In the city where they are needed most, is the hardest place to own them unless you are very wealthy and lucky enough to own a big house.

You see this is a classic example of one of the myths about batteries that perpetuate on the Internet. The battery in your phone is completely unmanaged so does degrade by around 2-3% per year. In battery terms things like phones get abused, almost always being charged to 100% (ofter daily), almost always rapid charged, no thermal management system to stop them getting too hot or cold.

Not of these things are true with regards to EV batteries, with the exception of no thermal management on the early Nissan Leaf. EV batteries also have a built in buffer, our Skoda has an 82 kwh battery, only 77 kwh can be used. This stops the battery being stressed by being charged/depleted to its maximum.

Tesla batteries have been around the longest and their average drop off is 1-1.5% per year but then levels off to almost 0 when it gets to 90% of its original capacity. There are Tesla taxi's out there with 500,000 miles on the original battery.

I do agree that the infrastructure in urban areas is not good enough, but that's not an EV issue that's a government/local council not getting their s**t together issue. If they want us all to get on board then they need to provide infrastructure for people who can't charge at home.

Some councils are better than others. Quite a few are trialing a type of cable channel that will allow a cable to be run across a footpath if for example you live in a terraced house. I know I doesn't stop someone else parking in front of your house but it all helps.

Don't forget we've had around 140 years of refinement gone into building ICE car infrastructure, we've only had around 10 years for EV's.

The reference to the phone was more to show the example that batteries degrade, all of them do, rather than actually 'failing'. The rates at which depend on usage, the 2-3% was pulled from a test done on a number of cars that was done. I am sure in another test it probably is 1-1.5% but the point I was making being that they degrade rather than fail.

Interestingly the Tesla warranty on the battery is 100,000 miles 8-10 years AND no less than 70% battery retention (1500 recharge cycles as well I think). There is an acceptance even within Teslas own warranty that batteries if used a certain way can lose their capacity significantly, if that wasnt the case then that 70% would be much higher.
 
Nictrix said:
I think the main difference is that not all engines need replaced after a certain amount of time or miles but you can guarantee that the batteries will need changed.

Actually the batteries (even though they will by the time they have done say 500k miles and be well down on their original capacity) will outlast the electric engines. I read about high mile Teslas 500k+ and the batteries are original but the motors are replaced multiple times.
 
Infrastructure is the problem for sure though. Councils have other priorities over and above charging electric cars, and their remit is very limited in any case, it should be the private sector building the infrastructure not council or government - sure there should be subsidies and grants but energy companies should be stepping in and taking that slot of building out large fast charging stations etc. There is quite simply no realistic solution right now for charging at home if you dont have a driveway, we cant sit and wait around for that to change.
 
buzyg said:
Dave1971 said:
buzyg said:
Most people drive cars that are more than 8 years old. :wink:

Yes and almost all of them only came with a 3 year warranty and they sill work just fine :P .

Many will have required new batteries to keep them working Just Fine. <£100 for most small ICE cars. Would be interested to know the cost of a new battery pack for a Nissan Leaf, for example? :P

I’d really love to know why you believe it will need a new battery? Genuine question. Where is the fact based evidence you have for this? Please god don’t tell me it was something you read in the Daily Fail!
 
coldel said:
Infrastructure is the problem for sure though. Councils have other priorities over and above charging electric cars, and their remit is very limited in any case, it should be the private sector building the infrastructure not council or government - sure there should be subsidies and grants but energy companies should be stepping in and taking that slot of building out large fast charging stations etc. There is quite simply no realistic solution right now for charging at home if you dont have a driveway, we cant sit and wait around for that to change.

I disagree, our entire economy and way of life is completely dependent on the easy movement of people and goods. Now the government has mandated that the way we do that Must change. For that to happen a fundamental part of the infrastructure that we need has to change too. To largely leave it to the free market to deal with is totally unacceptable , the government made the (massive) decision they need to be heavily involved in the solution.
 
Nictrix said:
I think the main difference is that not all engines need replaced after a certain amount of time or miles but you can guarantee that the batteries will need changed.

Based on what evidence? If you have links to genuine evidence that EV batteries are “guaranteed” to need replacing the I would genuinely love to read it.
 
Back
Top Bottom