35is and JB4

mcbutler said:
Nick9one1 said:
£124.87 | Intercooler N54 N55 135i 1M E82/E88 335i 335(x)i E90 E91 E92 93 E82-E93 exchanger Z4 E89 sDrive35i sDrive35is 35i 35is aircooler
https://s.click.aliexpress.com/e/K7smHRuCj
Did you need to do any body mods to ge iti in Nick?? Do you have the data for it, flow and volume, is it aluminium?
I noted one reviewer states a hose upgrade is required for a proper fit!
 
mcbutler said:
Yep, its 'conservative' and as far as you should go (without upgrading the intercooler for starters). I researched and contacted several specialist tuners with regard to the issue before I decided to go ahead. Every single one said nothing more without intercooler upgrades first if you want to get any sort of reliability and longevity from the engine.
In addition, anything more on public roads is useless for 'real' driving, straight line licence losing is all its good for in reality.

It's not really as clear cut as that. Keeping intake temps low helps prevent pre-ignition and increases the charge density so will boost power slightly. Ideally you want to keep intake air temps below 50C, the stock intercooler will do that fine at power levels under 400bhp.

I upgraded my intercooler and downpipes to get the most out of my stock turbochargers but before that I was happily running around the 400 mark with the stock intercooler with healthy charge temps. That's one of the perks of the UK climate.

The truth is that most UK based tuners are quite limited when it comes to single platform expertise and have a standard list of excuses to reel out to customers to convince them to spend their money. The bulk of them use generic maps which just modify a limited number of parameters in the stock software. They will have a tool that's capable of writing to the ECU on many cars and have a collection of generic tunes to apply to them, that's the standard business model of all these tuning shops offering £400~ remaps, Celtic are no different.

The generic files that they write to cars are actually freely available on the internet, these map packs all offer an easy bump in performance but leave a lot of power on the table. Those shops often have a dyno to give the impression that they actually do some R&D but in reality it's just there for the printout to keep the customer satisfied.

Currently MHD is the only tool capable of writing custom logic to the ECU so unless the likes of Celtic start using MHD and customising their own tunes they will always be trailing.
 
R.E92 said:
It's not really as clear cut as that. Keeping intake temps low helps prevent pre-ignition and increases the charge density so will boost power slightly. Ideally you want to keep intake air temps below 50C, the stock intercooler will do that fine at power levels under 400bhp.

I upgraded my intercooler and downpipes to get the most out of my stock turbochargers but before that I was happily running around the 400 mark with the stock intercooler with healthy charge temps. That's one of the perks of the UK climate.

The truth is that most UK based tuners are quite limited when it comes to single platform expertise and have a standard list of excuses to reel out to customers to convince them to spend their money. The bulk of them use generic maps which just modify a limited number of parameters in the stock software. They will have a tool that's capable of writing to the ECU on many cars and have a collection of generic tunes to apply to them, that's the standard business model of all these tuning shops offering £400~ remaps, Celtic are no different.

The generic files that they write to cars are actually freely available on the internet, these map packs all offer an easy bump in performance but leave a lot of power on the table. Those shops often have a dyno to give the impression that they actually do some R&D but in reality it's just there for the printout to keep the customer satisfied.

Currently MHD is the only tool capable of writing custom logic to the ECU so unless the likes of Celtic start using MHD and customising their own tunes they will always be trailing.

Very interesting. I've often wondered quite how much adjustment was made to a stock map by the tuning garages. I assumed there was maybe one or two parameters adjusted.
 
R.E92 said:
mcbutler said:
Yep, its 'conservative' and as far as you should go (without upgrading the intercooler for starters). I researched and contacted several specialist tuners with regard to the issue before I decided to go ahead. Every single one said nothing more without intercooler upgrades first if you want to get any sort of reliability and longevity from the engine.
In addition, anything more on public roads is useless for 'real' driving, straight line licence losing is all its good for in reality.

It's not really as clear cut as that. Keeping intake temps low helps prevent pre-ignition and increases the charge density so will boost power slightly. Ideally you want to keep intake air temps below 50C, the stock intercooler will do that fine at power levels under 400bhp.

I upgraded my intercooler and downpipes to get the most out of my stock turbochargers but before that I was happily running around the 400 mark with the stock intercooler with healthy charge temps. That's one of the perks of the UK climate.

The truth is that most UK based tuners are quite limited when it comes to single platform expertise and have a standard list of excuses to reel out to customers to convince them to spend their money. The bulk of them use generic maps which just modify a limited number of parameters in the stock software. They will have a tool that's capable of writing to the ECU on many cars and have a collection of generic tunes to apply to them, that's the standard business model of all these tuning shops offering £400~ remaps, Celtic are no different.

The generic files that they write to cars are actually freely available on the internet, these map packs all offer an easy bump in performance but leave a lot of power on the table. Those shops often have a dyno to give the impression that they actually do some R&D but in reality it's just there for the printout to keep the customer satisfied.

Currently MHD is the only tool capable of writing custom logic to the ECU so unless the likes of Celtic start using MHD and customising their own tunes they will always be trailing.
I agree with most of what you say, regarding research my point of focus was on US tuners who work mainly with the N54, although as you say, climate is obviously an issue.
The intercooler linked to earlier is an absolute bargain, might be worth trying to get a group purchase together on that?
Celtic would be pretty unhappy with you including them in the 'downloading maps' genre of tuners. They develop and write their own maps in house (which is probably why they can offer a 12 month guarantee against mechanical damage) and have a software suite & several research vehicles on the premises they are currently working on. They were the first to write a map for the 61 plate model C63 of which I had one.
I use them exclusively, there premises are state of the art and I have total faith in them.
 
I got my local tuning shop to add VRSF downpipes that l bought from ML performance and tune the car. It returned 385BHP & 450 lb of torque on the dyno. 2 years later l wanted a bit more, I fitted BMS DCI and a cheaper bigger FMIC from ebay. Bought MHD flasher and stage 2+ map (which was a complete Bastard to install due to Google play), tuning the exhaust is great fun. End result fantastic, l am very happy with the car for now, above 3000 revs it's absolutely balistic , below that it's 26mpg, do it! My car is a 35i 2009 38k.
 
I have a MHD stage 1+ tune and a Wagner intercooler on my 35is. Running on 100 octane it has 417 hp and 609 nm with no issues so far. Had the Z on the dyno a couple of times (at different garages) and the power delivery is very consistent. As a bonus, it also gets better fuel economy :rofl:

MHD is also easy to use and offers other useful options as well. Only issue was that I had to buy an Android device :poke:
 
R.E92 said:
MHD will come to Apple but there's no confirmed date yet, it's still in alpha testing. It will require the new MHD WiFi comms adapter which costs $70.

The best option would be to just buy a cheap android tablet that supports OTG and buy a BimmerGeeks cable. The cable also works for diagnostic programs like INPA and ISTA so is very useful to have.

The VRSF downpipes are brilliant. Very difficult to fit though. For an intercooler I'd stick with the VRSF one. I went for an eBay copy and it works just as well but took me ages to fit as it required modification.
2020 i emailed them and asked
 
Most reputable tuners would recommend a stage 1 (365 BHP - 400 LB/Ft) as the limit on stock components, even then an intercooler upgrade is recommended if you want to keep your turbos healthy.
I know Celtic guarantee your car against remap related damage but only cover up to stage 1 which speaks volumes really.
The N54 is one, if not the most, tuneable (is that a word?) engine BMW have produced but not the most reliable, the more you boost its output the shorter its lifespan, obviously.
My 35i is stage 1, got an intercooler on the way. The car is fast but still driveable on the twistys as opposed to a straight line missile, just need to get the bloody awful potenza tyres swapped for Pilot Sport 4S and it'll be brill
 
mcbutler said:
Most reputable tuners would recommend a stage 1 (365 BHP - 400 LB/Ft) as the limit on stock components, even then an intercooler upgrade is recommended if you want to keep your turbos healthy.
I know Celtic guarantee your car against remap related damage but only cover up to stage 1 which speaks volumes really.
The N54 is one, if not the most, tuneable (is that a word?) engine BMW have produced but not the most reliable, the more you boost its output the shorter its lifespan, obviously.
My 35i is stage 1, got an intercooler on the way. The car is fast but still driveable on the twistys as opposed to a straight line missile, just need to get the bloody awful potenza tyres swapped for Pilot Sport 4S and it'll be brill

Provided your IAT's are in check and your components are healthy there is no reason why you can not go above 365bhp. Stage 2+ which is 420bhp on MHD is a very conservative tune for the N54. The stock turbos approach their limit around circa 450bhp on 99 ron fuel, you can go higher with ethanol mixes / meth injection. The N54 its self is reliable, it is everything around it which is not lol.
Particularly injectors, HPFP, Turbo wastegates, Valve Cover spring to mind. Mods like an intercooler, downpipes etc will reduce IAT's, restriction, and stress on the turbos, if anything it could potentially increase the life of certain components.
 
mcbutler said:
Precisely, I would be interested to know the torque max limit for the DCT if anyone knows??

Transmission Model Engine/torque Transmittable torque rating
GS7D36SG E90 M3 E92 M3 E93 M3 400 Nm 520 Nm

The 36 stands for 360 ft lb which is the marketing torque limit

Most sources cite 520nm as the limit

Interesting that's the output shaft torque limit at 400nm input shaft

So the box is spec'd for the 35i constant max torque not the 35is boost torque number..
 
Pbondar said:
mcbutler said:
Precisely, I would be interested to know the torque max limit for the DCT if anyone knows??

Transmission Model Engine/torque Transmittable torque rating
GS7D36SG E90 M3 E92 M3 E93 M3 400 Nm 520 Nm

The 36 stands for 360 ft lb which is the marketing torque limit

Most sources cite 520nm as the limit

Interesting that's the output shaft torque limit at 400nm input shaft

So the box is spec'd for the 35i constant max torque not the 35is boost torque number..
wow, you really are the ‘font of all Z4 related knowledge’. Very interesting. So, my 35 I running 400lbft is probably going to wear the clutch pack out pretty quick!
 
mcbutler said:
Pbondar said:
mcbutler said:
Precisely, I would be interested to know the torque max limit for the DCT if anyone knows??

Transmission Model Engine/torque Transmittable torque rating
GS7D36SG E90 M3 E92 M3 E93 M3 400 Nm 520 Nm

The 36 stands for 360 ft lb which is the marketing torque limit

Most sources cite 520nm as the limit

Interesting that's the output shaft torque limit at 400nm input shaft

So the box is spec'd for the 35i constant max torque not the 35is boost torque number..
wow, you really are the ‘font of all Z4 related knowledge’. Very interesting. So, my 35 I running 400lbft is probably going to wear the clutch pack out pretty quick!

Its difficult to know..

On the one hand there are many people running boosted cars with these boxes without documented effects..

On the other people sell stronger clutch packs for them..

IMHO, British Leyland excepted (where I witnessed some true muppetry), most German companies would massively underate their products to avoid marginal warranty claims..

The manual box is alleged to be much stronger than the DSG for those going for serious OD on BHP on the 35i

Personally if the car was a keeper, and I pressed the go pedal to the bottom a lot I wouldn't go much more than 600nm max which is just a tad above the celtic type re-maps..
 
The DCT holds more torque than the manual transmission. The manual transmission is cheaper to upgrade though.

I've seen a few dyno slips from people holding 554ftlb (750Nm) without any reported slip.
 
I agree with Pbondar a comments BMW under rating the box to reduce warranty claims. Probably also the reason they don’t sell the engine in a 400bhp plus version!
 
Back
Top Bottom