1.4% of cars untaxed!
- Thread starter Angie4m
- Start date
It's typical internet myth that people then regurgitate as gospel.
No tax, no MOT, being pissed as a parrot, does not invalidate your insurance. It may put you in a rather precarious position with regards to your own claim but any 3rd party would be covered, on the assumption that any claim was down to you.
Suggest anyone that believes it invalidates your insurance, pops over to PistonHeads and asks the resident car insurance expert, LoonR1, the question. And then stand back for the hair dryer treatment.
No tax, no MOT, being pissed as a parrot, does not invalidate your insurance. It may put you in a rather precarious position with regards to your own claim but any 3rd party would be covered, on the assumption that any claim was down to you.
Suggest anyone that believes it invalidates your insurance, pops over to PistonHeads and asks the resident car insurance expert, LoonR1, the question. And then stand back for the hair dryer treatment.
Which all counts for nothing as the ONLY thing that actually tells you the limitations of your insurance is the insurance document it's self. In the case of my insurance it's what's defined as being something very similar to "legally entitled to be stored or driven on the public highway". That phrasing means that a vehicle without VED or MOT isn't technically insured to be driven or stored on the road. However for my motorbike it's fully insured to drive unless it's "mechanically unsafe to ride", which means as long as it's not explicitly failed an MOT for something like a damaged tyre or binding brake calliper it'll be insured.Lance said:
