0-60
- Thread starter oo7ml
- Start date
Smokin said:Man, you guys are obsessive about 0-60.... :roll:
BMW is notoriously conservative in their published times and the auto mags haven't gotten their hands on it yet.
I'd rather
a a car that will do 0-60 in 4 seconds with a top speed of 70mph than
b a car that will do 0-60 in 6 seconds with a top speed of 200mph
I get more of rush accelerating than doing top speed... actually it would be very interesting to compare a & b with other users, i'l make a poll and post it in the general section
oo7ml said:Smokin said:Man, you guys are obsessive about 0-60.... :roll:
BMW is notoriously conservative in their published times and the auto mags haven't gotten their hands on it yet.
I'd rather
a a car that will do 0-60 in 4 seconds with a top speed of 70mph than
b a car that will do 0-60 in 6 seconds with a top speed of 200mph
I get more of rush accelerating than doing top speed... actually it would be very interesting to compare a & b with other users, i'l make a poll and post it in the general section
Make sure you include an option for 4 secs and 200 mph which I suspect might be popular
Yep the Z4 sDrive 35i with 'DKG' sprints in 5,1s (0 to 100 km/h). Actually it is the same as a new M3 convertible with dkg!! (and that one has 420 hp....)
It's a pitty that BMW hasn't put the latest version from the 35i engine in the car, producing 326 hp. It's the engine from the 7-series. But I geuss that the problem would be that the Z4 would be faster then the M3 convertible which is very difficult to explain to the customers....
It's a pitty that BMW hasn't put the latest version from the 35i engine in the car, producing 326 hp. It's the engine from the 7-series. But I geuss that the problem would be that the Z4 would be faster then the M3 convertible which is very difficult to explain to the customers....
PhilDZ4 said:Sticks said:oo7ml said:
Make sure you include an option for 4 secs and 200 mph which I suspect might be popular
You gotta get the aftermarket overthrusters for that kind of performance.
Or that Corvette on the other thread (0-60 in ONE second)!!!!!!!!!
oo7ml said:Smokin said:Man, you guys are obsessive about 0-60.... :roll:
BMW is notoriously conservative in their published times and the auto mags haven't gotten their hands on it yet.
I'd rather
a a car that will do 0-60 in 4 seconds with a top speed of 70mph than
b a car that will do 0-60 in 6 seconds with a top speed of 200mph
I get more of rush accelerating than doing top speed... actually it would be very interesting to compare a & b with other users, i'l make a poll and post it in the general section
You get more excitement by rushing away from a standstill? I think it`s overrated :wink: . Personally for me, a 20-90mph performance I would rate much better than crappy traffic light racing times (0-60). I once had a car that was only 6.7secs 0-60 time but 2nd through to fourth gears it was as fast as other cars that had a much lower 0-60 time. Main reason it was slower 0-60 was a long first gear that made it great for track use but starting from a stopped position was a little slower but so what, once your moving, 0-60 times means pretty much zilch.
