Z4MR Vs Dodge Viper
- Thread starter buzyg
- Start date
Good vid. The viper looks huge compared to the Z4MR.
Thanks for posting.
Thanks for posting.
:lol:Truth said:It was the lumpant and low powered American version, so not 343bhp. If it had been the full fat European version it would of won and dare I say if it had been the coupe instead of the woolly roadsterit would of walked it!
:lol: The force is strong with this one. :wink:buzyg said::lol:Truth said:It was the lumpant and low powered American version, so not 343bhp. If it had been the full fat European version it would of won and dare I say if it had been the coupe instead of the woolly roadster
Lol. Cheers man!
Cheburator
Member
Truth said:It was the lumpant and low powered American version, so not 343bhp. If it had been the full fat European version it would of won and dare I say if it had been the coupe instead of the woolly roadster
Does your expert opinion come out because you have driven a VIPER? This is so staged it is not even funny. The Z4MC/R is still a reasonably fast car, but a driver who is "on it" in the VIPER in a proper contest is so far ahead, it would not be even funny...
And yes, I do have a reasonable amount of track/wheel time in my brother's Viper, which made a few GT3s weep at various UK tracks...
You'll be trying to tell us the ///M5 touring is faster than a Z4///M next.Cheburator said:Truth said:It was the lumpant and low powered American version, so not 343bhp. If it had been the full fat European version it would of won and dare I say if it had been the coupe instead of the woolly roadster
Does your expert opinion come out because you have driven a VIPER? This is so staged it is not even funny. The Z4MC/R is still a reasonably fast car, but a driver who is "on it" in the VIPER in a proper contest is so far ahead, it would not be even funny...
And yes, I do have a reasonable amount of track/wheel time in my brother's Viper, which made a few GT3s weep at various UK tracks...
:lol:Cheburator said:Truth said:It was the lumpant and low powered American version, so not 343bhp. If it had been the full fat European version it would of won and dare I say if it had been the coupe instead of the woolly roadster
Does your expert opinion come out because you have driven a VIPER? This is so staged it is not even funny. The Z4MC/R is still a reasonably fast car, but a driver who is "on it" in the VIPER in a proper contest is so far ahead, it would not be even funny...
And yes, I do have a reasonable amount of track/wheel time in my brother's Viper, which made a few GT3s weep at various UK tracks...
Well done!
My comment was in jest. Though I’m sure it’s hard for u to get that! Staged, on Top Gear.... no!! :roll:
You don’t know what cars I have driven or have owned, so my “expert opinion” may or may not count for anything. I don’t know why you have this hostility in your comments on such a lighthearted thread. Looks like you’ve had nothing better to do with your time. :roll:
Steve84N said:On some tracks yes, the Nurburgring times are virtually identical at around 8:12.buzyg said:You'll be trying to tell us the ///M5 touring is faster than a Z4///M next.
That's a pleasant surprise. I was joking and had assumed the M5 was faster
(Note to self, never assume anything)
