WHAT CAR REVIEW - E89 VS AUDI TT MK2
- Thread starter MACK
- Start date
A
Anonymous
Guest
As good as the TT might be it still looks like an upturned bathtub 
What I can't understand is why test a non m sport car against a TT that is obviously an S line, you can even see the little badges on the wings. Surely most buyers in the market with circa £13k + to spend and are considering a TT in S line spec would equally be seeking out Z4s in M Sport spec, even if it costs a bit more money.
Yes, but this is What Car ( 
) - the result would hopefully have been different in something a bit less Mumsnet! :lol:
I mean would anybody thinking of buying either of these really care that one averaged 42.2 mpg and the other an appalling 41.5 mpg FFS! :roll:
I wouldn't read What Car for a car for "fun in the sun", in the same way that if I had to buy some sort of crossover/SUV stuff (which will thankfully never happen) I wouldn't be looking for road tests of those in EVO!
) - the result would hopefully have been different in something a bit less Mumsnet! :lol:I mean would anybody thinking of buying either of these really care that one averaged 42.2 mpg and the other an appalling 41.5 mpg FFS! :roll:
I wouldn't read What Car for a car for "fun in the sun", in the same way that if I had to buy some sort of crossover/SUV stuff (which will thankfully never happen) I wouldn't be looking for road tests of those in EVO!
The opening line of the review states:
The brevity and inconsistency of the British summer is probably one of the reasons we buy a surprisingly large number of convertibles.
What? Is the reviewer making a joke, because it doesn't come across that way. So, because you have short summers, with lots of rain, you buy a lot of convertibles?? :?
Actually, I've read plenty of times that England has one of the highest purchase rates of convertibles, so I just assumed you were all lying about your bad summers to make the rest of us feel better :lol:
The brevity and inconsistency of the British summer is probably one of the reasons we buy a surprisingly large number of convertibles.
What? Is the reviewer making a joke, because it doesn't come across that way. So, because you have short summers, with lots of rain, you buy a lot of convertibles?? :?
Actually, I've read plenty of times that England has one of the highest purchase rates of convertibles, so I just assumed you were all lying about your bad summers to make the rest of us feel better :lol:
True - Germany most, UK second. Frankly it's way too hot in the other large markets - Spain, Italy, France. Very few drive with tops down, aside the odd tourists..enzed4 said:
MACK said:
Good point, although the S line cars have no engine performance mods they often have upgraded suspensions etc.
What these reviewers always forget is it does not matter, I bought my Zee because of its looks, road stance, driving position and of course the steel roof.
Sure TT is a good car but I would not guy one.... No mater how much better this individual thinks it might be.
Interesting review. As coincidence would have it we are off to France next week in my wife's (2014) 2.0iS and will be accompanied by our friends in their (slightly older, 2009) TT 2.0something something. I know which car I would prefer to be in for the trip. But I am slightly biased as I had 2 TTs in series 1 guise, from which I concluded that TT stood for Total Tedium. In the series 2 perhaps TT stands for Transiently Tedious?
A
Anonymous
Guest
mcbutler said:
Seconded.....
A
Anonymous
Guest
....... aper:
aper:Similar threads
