Must have been some fun driving experiences. The GT86 was on my short list along with the latest MX5 when I ended up going with my current Z4MC.I did have a TT and a GT86,
Must have been some fun driving experiences. The GT86 was on my short list along with the latest MX5 when I ended up going with my current Z4MC.I did have a TT and a GT86,
I went from a TT mk1 to a GT86, probably one of the first ones in the UK. My first thought on getting behind the wheel was, wow this is how a sports car’s supposed to ride and handle. I clocked up 90k miles in that car, it was absolutely brilliant.Must have been some fun driving experiences. The GT86 was on my short list along with the latest MX5 when I ended up going with my current Z4MC.
Must have been some fun driving experiences. The GT86 was on my short list along with the latest MX5 when I ended up going with my current Z4MC.
A Mk I TT was a lovely place to be and surprisingly practical, but not much fun as a driving experience. It was quick in most circumstances (certainly for a very young and irresponsible me), but had none of the attributes that make a car fun to drive.I went from a TT mk1 to a GT86, probably one of the first ones in the UK. My first thought on getting behind the wheel was, wow this is how a sports car’s supposed to ride and handle. I clocked up 90k miles in that car, it was absolutely brilliant.

It was certainly implied in numerous posts, and it is a given that it should have some appealing driving attributes.Nobody suggested (I think) that a ‘sports car’ would be dynamically, performance, and braking superior to or even equivalent to a comparable ‘box’…
A Frogeye Sprite wouldn’t meet many dynamic or performance criteria but folks then though they were great little sports cars aka roadsters