Hi all,
I'm a brand new member having finally decided to take the plunge on a Zed. With so many options though I am struggling to decide which one is right for me so would really appreciate any advice. I'm 32 and will be using the car at weekends only for getaways out of the city. Budget is £7,500.
Firstly, I think I've decided that a 2.0 is out as from what I've heard you 'need' a straight 6 on these cars to really enjoy them. This leaves me with the 2.2, 2.5 and 3.0 and some key questions:
1) What's the fuel consumption like between the 2.2, 2.5 and 3.0 from your experience? Is the 3.0 going to cost me twice as much to get around, or are we talking minimal difference given I'm not doing huge mileage / commuting every day?
2) Other than fuel, how do the general running costs compare between the three? (tax is the same!)
3) Am I right to disregard the 2.0 completely? Is the sound and experience that much better on the 2.2 upwards? Is the 2.0 going to be super economical to run compared to the others?
4) Insurance. Bizarrely, of the quotes I have got, the 2.5 is is the cheapest followed by the 3.0. 2.0 is more to insure than 3.0, and the 2.2 is the most of any of them! Is this right and why would this be? It seems the wrong way round but maybe there is a reason.
Sorry, lots of newbie questions here I know. I am most tempted by the 2.5 I think but any guidance gratefully received.
Cheers
I'm a brand new member having finally decided to take the plunge on a Zed. With so many options though I am struggling to decide which one is right for me so would really appreciate any advice. I'm 32 and will be using the car at weekends only for getaways out of the city. Budget is £7,500.
Firstly, I think I've decided that a 2.0 is out as from what I've heard you 'need' a straight 6 on these cars to really enjoy them. This leaves me with the 2.2, 2.5 and 3.0 and some key questions:
1) What's the fuel consumption like between the 2.2, 2.5 and 3.0 from your experience? Is the 3.0 going to cost me twice as much to get around, or are we talking minimal difference given I'm not doing huge mileage / commuting every day?
2) Other than fuel, how do the general running costs compare between the three? (tax is the same!)
3) Am I right to disregard the 2.0 completely? Is the sound and experience that much better on the 2.2 upwards? Is the 2.0 going to be super economical to run compared to the others?
4) Insurance. Bizarrely, of the quotes I have got, the 2.5 is is the cheapest followed by the 3.0. 2.0 is more to insure than 3.0, and the 2.2 is the most of any of them! Is this right and why would this be? It seems the wrong way round but maybe there is a reason.
Sorry, lots of newbie questions here I know. I am most tempted by the 2.5 I think but any guidance gratefully received.
Cheers