Rear Tyre Recommendations?

Apparently "Tyre Leaders" in Germany are the cheapest place to go? Mixed reviews on delivery/stock, but the best for price over BlackCircles et al.
 
simonlpearce said:
How come you strayed away from the OEM sizes? I would have though 80 miles would be plenty to scrub in a set of tyres so perhaps the smaller tyres is causing problems with the TC.

Just because it's OEM doesn't mean it's optimal. I've always found 255 tyres look low on pressure with their bulge. 245 is apparently the optimal width for an 8.5" rim so thought it was worth a go.

10mm cannot affect traction that much. They are literally over 50 percent down on grip I'd say. I'll keep being in and see how things go. Maybe a pressure adjustment is also in order.
 
EdButler said:
simonlpearce said:
How come you strayed away from the OEM sizes? I would have though 80 miles would be plenty to scrub in a set of tyres so perhaps the smaller tyres is causing problems with the TC.

Just because it's OEM doesn't mean it's optimal. I've always found 255 tyres look low on pressure with their bulge. 245 is apparently the optimal width for an 8.5" rim so thought it was worth a go.

10mm cannot affect traction that much. They are literally over 50 percent down on grip I'd say. I'll keep being in and see how things go. Maybe a pressure adjustment is also in order.

The issue is that by going smaller to a 245, you have also reduced the profile as this is a percentage of the width. So likely as you are effectively running a smaller profile its will be stiffer and likely will affect the handling.

Personally i think i will stick to OEM sizes.
 
Stuart Truman said:
I've fitted the Hankooks after having them on the Alpina and they're great. Better rated on economy and noise than almost anything. Also good in the wet.

I can get a set of these from Tyre Leader for £396 delivered - are you still loving them Stu ? And did you get the 117 or 120s ? I've no idea what the difference is, if any...
 
Bing said:
Stuart Truman said:
I've fitted the Hankooks after having them on the Alpina and they're great. Better rated on economy and noise than almost anything. Also good in the wet.

I can get a set of these from Tyre Leader for £396 delivered - are you still loving them Stu ? And did you get the 117 or 120s ? I've no idea what the difference is, if any...
K117 is the S1 Evo 2 (max performance tyre).
K120 is the V12 Evo 2 (high performance tyre).
 
Ah, ok, sorry - I quoted the wrong one :oops:

I meant 117 and 107 - the only difference seems to be tread pattern, with the latter being smoother / less grooved. Oh, and a lower rating in the wet for 107. So I guess 117 is the one to go for.
 
Bing said:
Ah, ok, sorry - I quoted the wrong one :oops:

I meant 117 and 107 - the only difference seems to be tread pattern, with the latter being smoother / less grooved. Oh, and a lower rating in the wet for 107. So I guess 117 is the one to go for.
In that case, you'll be happy to hear that the 117 is just the new version of the 107 - i.e. S1 Evo vs S1 Evo 2

Supposedly done the impossible and made it perform better and last longer - just like Goodyear did with the F1A to the F1A2 :thumbsup:
 
Awesome. Now I just need to decide whether to get them or not - cheers mmm-five :thumbsup:
 
Bing said:
Awesome. Now I just need to decide whether to get them or not - cheers mmm-five :thumbsup:
Well, it's about a £160 saving on what I pay for a set of PSS.

They've got good reviews, but not seen an info on how long they last.

My last set of front PSS have just been changed after 41,500 miles. Rears are averaging about half that. If they last anywhere near that then they'll be a bargain.
 
My front Conti's lasted just over 40k, originals apparently. The rears are not far away from needing done, and with some serious road trip / hooning in the very near future I'm thinking of changing them. Issue is that I swapped some 235/45/18 contisportcontact 3s that I bought on here onto the front and they are rubbing on the front edge of the arch liners on both sides. I thought they'd be fine (as did others), but looking online they seem to have extra rim protection which is probably the issue. I don't like it, so I'm thinking I need to change them too. And 4 new tyres is not really in my current budget :cry:
 
Bing said:
My front Conti's lasted just over 40k, originals apparently. The rears are not far away from needing done, and with some serious road trip / hooning in the very near future I'm thinking of changing them. Issue is that I swapped some 235/45/18 contisportcontact 3s that I bought on here onto the front and they are rubbing on the front edge of the arch liners on both sides. I thought they'd be fine (as did others), but looking online they seem to have extra rim protection which is probably the issue. I don't like it, so I'm thinking I need to change them too. And 4 new tyres is not really in my current budget :cry:


Bugger on them rubbing ! I had them on non M Z so different wheel offset & also SE suspension .
Worth selling on & throw the cash into the new tyres ?
I certainly don't think the Hankook's would feel anything other than premium & most likely better all round than the Conti's ?
 
Yeah, if someone on SE springs and RFTs wants to go non-RFT then these would be a cheap front set-up to get going. They'd probably be ok on Sport suspension to with non-M offsets. Guess I'll just have to bite the bullet - was worth a punt at the time though :thumbsup:
 
EdButler said:
I've recently put on Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 on the rear, and I know the first hundred or so miles you have to take things carefully, but these things are dangerous at the moment! I'm getting the DSC flashing when driving fairly normally on damp or dry roads! I've done approx 80 miles so far...

Any comments on how long they take to bed in?

Oh and 245/40 fit wonderfully on the Z. £99 each delivered from oponeo.

There's a post elsewhere about the GY F1s and the need to run them in for a longer time than other tyres. General concensus was at least 200 miles and sometimes needed more.

I had the same experience as yourself but after much hooning in all sorts of weather I'm sold on them - been excellent. :thumbsup:

:driving: :thumbsup:
 
mmm-five said:
My last set of front PSS have just been changed after 41,500 miles. Rears are averaging about half that. If they last anywhere near that then they'll be a bargain.


Bing said:
My front Conti's lasted just over 40k, originals apparently. :

I'm amazed by the mileage you're both quoting on your tyres - wow, that's impressive. I'm nearer half that - what's happening (I know both you guys don't hang about :o )

Should I be buying more expensive tyres? (I've been using Falkans - they do wear fast but also Goodyear Eagle Assymetrics) Alignment done as well . . . .

:driving: :thumbsup:
 
paulgs1000 said:
I'm amazed by the mileage you're both quoting on your tyres - wow, that's impressive. I'm nearer half that - what's happening (I know both you guys don't hang about :o )

Should I be buying more expensive tyres? (I've been using Falkans - they do wear fast but also Goodyear Eagle Assymetrics) Alignment done as well . . . .
I do a few track days, Ring trips and Welsh/Peak District/Lake District hoons a year, but that probably only accounts for 20% of my mileage. The rest of my 25,000 mile a year mileage is boring old motorway commuting which doesn't seem to use much tread.

One explanation would be that I'm a really smooth driver :?

Another would be that I'm getting older and slower :P

However I seem to be able to keep up with the other drivers (i.e. friends in similar cars) on track and they're using twice as much fuel and tyre life as me :evil: :driving:
 
mmm-five said:
paulgs1000 said:
I'm amazed by the mileage you're both quoting on your tyres - wow, that's impressive. I'm nearer half that - what's happening (I know both you guys don't hang about :o )

Should I be buying more expensive tyres? (I've been using Falkans - they do wear fast but also Goodyear Eagle Assymetrics) Alignment done as well . . . .
I do a few track days, Ring trips and Welsh/Peak District/Lake District hoons a year, but that probably only accounts for 20% of my mileage. The rest of my 25,000 mile a year mileage is boring old motorway commuting which doesn't seem to use much tread.

One explanation would be that I'm a really smooth driver :?

Another would be that I'm getting older and slower :P

However I seem to be able to keep up with the other drivers (i.e. friends in similar cars) on track and they're using twice as much fuel and tyre life as me :evil: :driving:

Well our Zed is mainly used for enjoyment, 12000 miles a year, so it would reverse your %ages but I'm still impressed by those figures.

Even so, got to be smooooth then. Followed you on the recent Wales hoon and can vouch for all of the above :thumbsup: :D

:driving: :thumbsup:
 
Back
Top Bottom