ihadablackdog
Senior member
My wife has received a PCN from a private parking company because she stopped on a bit of land (the access way to the car park) temporarily to attend to our dog who was having an epileptic seizure. She then proceeded to the car park and paid for the normal parking ticket.
This was in July and the notice received in August (it is an ANPR site). We went back out "to check" and there are plenty of signs in place clearly stating that stopping on that section is prohibited, and on their website is clearly shows her car under one of the signs, and a second picture shows her outside of the car (when she was walking to the back passenger door to get to the dog).
In pure black and white, she is guilty as charged....she did stop on that section and can't argue the signage!
HOWEVER.....due to the reason for stopping...the dog having an epileptic seizure (i.e. medical emergency, even though its a dog) coupled with her then proceeding to the car park and paying correctly, is it reasonable for us to appeal?
She also contacted the vet, so they have a record of the dog being ill that day. Admittedly this doesn't prove that he had a fit in that particular location, but does prove he was ill that day.
So, we did appeal via their process explaining our "reasons" and it was rejected. The rejection letter just said the car was stopped when it shouldn't have been and there was signage to say so. It made no reference to our reasons. Therefore, I don't believe the appeal was actually properly considered.
This car park is notorious for the actions of this company. We have parked there several times without problem as we pay the parking fee. On one occasion I paid twice cos the first time I missed a digit off the numberplate!
My argument is that she stopped for an emergency, was not causing an obstruction and later paid the parking fee, so they lost no money. Their argument is purely that the camera caught her stationary where the sign said she shouldn't be.
To make it even more annoying is that they are impossible to talk to. When I phone I get stonewalled with some gimp saying they only deal via letter or email. So today I emailed and posted a letter re-iterating the mitigating circumstances and said I expect a phone call to discuss the appeal, so they can explain why a medical emergency isn't considered reasonable grounds to waive the fee. I stated they have 7 days to call or I will consider the matter closed. I don't see how they can hide and not talk.
The charge is £100, reduced to £60 if paid in 14 days.
It used to be you could ignore these things, but I'm sure that has changed...has it? Also, this isn't a charge for unpaid parking, it is a charge for stopping on prohibited ground, so is that different, or is it still just an invoice?
She's worried that they will take it further, but I just think its wrong so want to fight it. At least until the 14 days are up.
This was in July and the notice received in August (it is an ANPR site). We went back out "to check" and there are plenty of signs in place clearly stating that stopping on that section is prohibited, and on their website is clearly shows her car under one of the signs, and a second picture shows her outside of the car (when she was walking to the back passenger door to get to the dog).
In pure black and white, she is guilty as charged....she did stop on that section and can't argue the signage!
HOWEVER.....due to the reason for stopping...the dog having an epileptic seizure (i.e. medical emergency, even though its a dog) coupled with her then proceeding to the car park and paying correctly, is it reasonable for us to appeal?
She also contacted the vet, so they have a record of the dog being ill that day. Admittedly this doesn't prove that he had a fit in that particular location, but does prove he was ill that day.
So, we did appeal via their process explaining our "reasons" and it was rejected. The rejection letter just said the car was stopped when it shouldn't have been and there was signage to say so. It made no reference to our reasons. Therefore, I don't believe the appeal was actually properly considered.
This car park is notorious for the actions of this company. We have parked there several times without problem as we pay the parking fee. On one occasion I paid twice cos the first time I missed a digit off the numberplate!
My argument is that she stopped for an emergency, was not causing an obstruction and later paid the parking fee, so they lost no money. Their argument is purely that the camera caught her stationary where the sign said she shouldn't be.
To make it even more annoying is that they are impossible to talk to. When I phone I get stonewalled with some gimp saying they only deal via letter or email. So today I emailed and posted a letter re-iterating the mitigating circumstances and said I expect a phone call to discuss the appeal, so they can explain why a medical emergency isn't considered reasonable grounds to waive the fee. I stated they have 7 days to call or I will consider the matter closed. I don't see how they can hide and not talk.
The charge is £100, reduced to £60 if paid in 14 days.
It used to be you could ignore these things, but I'm sure that has changed...has it? Also, this isn't a charge for unpaid parking, it is a charge for stopping on prohibited ground, so is that different, or is it still just an invoice?
She's worried that they will take it further, but I just think its wrong so want to fight it. At least until the 14 days are up.
