New X5 40d - first impressions

Company car (new Range Rover Sport) was swapped for an X5 this morning, xDrive40d to be precise with 3rd row seating and auxiliary heating.

First impressions after a few hours of driving are that overall it's a nice car to drive. The X5 has definitely got fatter and chunkier as each new variant comes out and this new model feels very big and commanding on the road. The performance is pretty similar to the RR Sport (SDV6) when you boot it and it feels roomier inside and no turbo lag. Good quality materials all round unlike some found in the RR Sport, particularly the bit of plastic trim above your head in the middle where the reading lights are which bends and sounds like a plastic takeaway container. Not what you want to find on a £60,000-70,000 'luxury' car.

Things that I dislike at the moment:
-Audi's MMI, Merc's COMAND and Land Rover's interface are all a lot more intuitive and easier to navigate than BMW's iDrive system, but this could be because I've not really had a good play on iDrive before.
-The side streps/skirts are so big and chunky that after you've been driving through water, the backs of your legs get wet when you get out of the car
-The centre cubby in the armrest opens with a split down the middle rather than just lifting up. A bit pointless I feel.
-I'd be happy to drive most of the time in ECO+ mode but when you turn the car off, then get back in, the car defaults back to the standard 'Comfort' mode. I'd like it to remain in the last mode chosen.
-The 'one touch' indicator and wiper stalks. But I suppose it's like getting a new phone... I'll get used to them.
-The top left buttons near the iDrive wheel are completely obscured by the big wheel. While I don't know where anything is yet, this will probably get better in time once I become familiar of where certain buttons are located such as 'Radio' and 'Media'.

There's a plethora of options and settings to play around with in the various menus in the iDrive with lots of settings for mood lighting and driving set up, but in all modes the ride is quite firm and I'm surprised BMW haven't fitted the new X5 with air suspension as standard.

Navigation is good and simple to use as well. The touch pad to draw the letters and numbers from a postcode is neat.

Another little styling feature I like is the long slit just behind the front wheels which you can see right through.

Here's some pics anyway:
2hzlr13.jpg


2hrz5hf.jpg


121g0sh.jpg


xf95s2.jpg


1tn7n9.jpg


2r60g9c.jpg


4lk9zk.jpg
 
Lovely, but why did you give back the new shape RRS?

It's leaps and bounds better than another short of a full fat Range Rover.
 
Looks nice.
Tbh this is the first Gen x5 I have liked the look of.

Think it's quite smart.
The gadgets looks great too from your pictures! :D
Also impressed as to what you said about the speed of it!

Looking good :driving:
 
Stark said:
Lovely, but why did you give back the new shape RRS?

It's leaps and bounds better than another short of a full fat Range Rover.

They're on a short lease, about 3 months or 10,500 miles (whichever comes first) so it was just time to change. Usually have RR Sports, but been through a Cayenne and some full fat Range Rovers too. I have to say I prefer the RR Sport currently but it's probably only because that's what I'm used to.
 
Interesting, I have the 40d as well in e70 shape which I actually prefer looks wise. Surprised you somehow preferred the RRS as the engine of the BMW is so far ahead with the double turbo without lag.

I find the material in the RRS very cheap compared to the BMW.
 
Probably, PVR, because you've been dressed in everything from C&A since childhood, and when good materials come up to you, you don't realise it :poke: :D
 
If you like agricultural size knobs in the cars :P

Worst part is the engine though, years behind. Client of mine is rejecting his as being dangerous due to the lag that leaves the car powerless when pulling away.
 
Picked up my new X5 30d (with lots of toys) just before Christmas and really like it. Gave up on the RRS when I couldn't get any interest from sales guys in two LR dealers but also didn't think it was worth the extra money. Similarly chose the 30d over the 40d as I figured the performance of the 30d was more than acceptable for a big SUV.

In contrast to the OP, I find the iDrive easier to use than the COMAND system in the E-Class I had before (which also had the same split centre cubby armrest). The touch pad on the idrive is really neat and the menus are intuitive. I do agree that it's annoying that you have to put it in ECO Pro mode every time you start the engine rather than it re-starting in whatever mode it was last in.

Overall really happy with it and can't find any issues with it (apart from having to teach the dog to jump up into it after teaching him not to jump up at anything!)
 
Stark said:
Nothing touches RRS and RR

Wot he said. I hated the X5. Auto box. Throttle response. iDrive. Runflats. Bulk. Lack of space. Plastics. Noise. Ride. .. This has to be some machine if it's better than the new RR Sport. IMHO obvo.
 
That is amazing as you are the first person I have ever heard complain about the 8 speed gearbox from BMW which is generally perceived as the best about.

Trust you have a manual e89 then as the x5 box is miles ahead of the e89 box.
 
It was a 6 speed auto I recall. It was always in the wrong gear, I had same or similar box in my 330d.
 
Bit you van not compare The e53 to a current RRS, the previous RRS with 5 speed box was the slowest 4x4 about. The current generation x5 is always the segment leader compared to the RRS. Probably the next generation will be on par
 
A1GSS said:
It was a 6 speed auto I recall. It was always in the wrong gear, I had same or similar box in my 330d.
I have had that gearbox in my 330i/330d/X5 and agree its not up to much at all, as PVR says though the 8 speed in the later X5 and 640d and other bmw`s is very impressive and I don't like autos that much so it is high praise, slowly getting to like an auto gearbox now though...but I only think that's the case because I haven't used a manual for a while!
 
pvr said:
Bit you van not compare The e53 to a current RRS, the previous RRS with 5 speed box was the slowest 4x4 about. The current generation x5 is always the segment leader compared to the RRS. Probably the next generation will be on par
Fair point. :thumbsup:

6 speed auto in the previous generation TDV6 RRS. The previous RRS with the V8 supercharger was pretty speedy....
 
I have the 8 speed E71 X6 and agree with was said that the engine is far superior having owned the RR before.

Very nice car and engine is great.

BMW for me.
 
Back
Top Bottom