TBH both,definitely feels sharper more responsive and no negative effects of Alpha N.1536Z4 said:Which bit are you enjoying the most the sound or performance ?
Or the dyno/operator is using the wrong transmission loss %grannyknot said:Those are excellent numbers, you must have more going on with your engine than just a CSL airbox?
I love it too, but only as long as it's someone else's S54 being taken over the standard RPM limitMr Tidy said:I love the sound of an S54 at high revs!![]()
And 388bhp is very impressive - where did you get the extra 50 from? :lol:
Agree with you on that,heart in mouth after signing disclaimer and hearing my own car at full chat. :rofl:mmm-five said:I love it too, but only as long as it's someone else's S54 being taken over the standard RPM limitMr Tidy said:I love the sound of an S54 at high revs!![]()
And 388bhp is very impressive - where did you get the extra 50 from? :lol:![]()
Really don't like the high revs in person, from outside the car though...just sounds like it's going to explode![]()
and this is why one has to take the result with a massive pinch of salt and it is only useful to compare before and after results.mmm-five said:Or the dyno/operator is using the wrong transmission loss %grannyknot said:Those are excellent numbers, you must have more going on with your engine than just a CSL airbox?![]()
Just abitgrannyknot said:Those are excellent numbers, you must have more going on with your engine than just a CSL airbox?
Jon2215 said:Just abitgrannyknot said:Those are excellent numbers, you must have more going on with your engine than just a CSL airbox?![]()
Hi Iggy,there Eisemann rear boxesIggy said:Just out of interest, what backboxes do you have?
Areeve performance in Kings Lynn BMW Porsche specialistGT Spec said:Very impressive. Who did the tune if you don’t mind me asking?