Lowest mileage 3.0Si...

Like the seat colour.

Not keen on the wheels, but they were done to death at the time.
 
Lovely looking car, but you'd have to be a nutter to buy that. Such low mileage is not good for a car which is now 6 years old!

Plus I bet it's never been serviced in that time.
 
Yeah, those wheels suit the coupe better. Can be changed though. I am not a fan of piano black either, but again that can be changed. Key thing is the service history. Should have had at least 3 oil changes in 6 years... Not sure what else would need careful attention. That bolster wear / saggyness worries me a little too. It is not bad, and if it's been driven by someone with a huge ass then fine. But still...
 
the seat may look a bit worn as the owner probably used to just sat in it and pretend he was on the open road
 
Taz said:
the seat may look a bit worn as the owner probably used to just sat in it and pretend he was on the open road

Would check the inside windscreen for spit, then.
 
Taz said:
the seat may look a bit worn as the owner probably used to just sat in it and pretend he was on the open road

Was it one of Tim's old cars :D
 
Who would seriously spend that much on a Si ? When you could have a lovely M roadster or Alpina :? Garage queening low mileage mass produced cars would offer little as an investment I doubt long term
 
I spent a grand or so less on mine almost two years ago with a lot more miles... But I have learnt a lot since then :D
 
Borderline negligence to own a car of that type and do only 4,500 in 6 years.... :thumbsdown:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thing is, rubber does perish more quickly if not used regularly. I'd rather buy one that's done 5x the miles nice and regular.
 
Back
Top Bottom