Is my signature pic going to offend people?

As an adult forum I'm confident the 'adult' decision will be (has been) made in this context.

The context relating to fund raising for a girl and family . . . . makes complete sense to me and such decisions have been discussed, reasoned and acted upon before - in an adult way - in other contexts on this forum.

Wholely appropriate response and decision making by all involved :thumbsup:
 
john-e89 said:
You're not giving them a choice though are you, by putting that image up it means if anyone wants to view the thread they see a potentially inappropriate image like it or not, that's not a choice. The only choice they have is to read the thread or not and if they do want to read it and click on it it's too late, they've seen it, that is'nt choice. I just cannot understand what the problem is not having an image of that nature on that thread, just don't have it, simple, take any doubt away, there's plenty of space on the rest of the forum for that, it's simple logic. The mods are human and if they did'nt see any problem with Perry's image for that thread then no disrespect to them but I don't agree with them.

ONE thread only has to stay clean, that is all, it's easy.
Click to expand...

With that rationale, any forum member who has a signature or avatar that can be construed as inappropriate or offensive (and there are more than a few), should not reply to that post or perhaps change their signature or avatar to accommodate any guest on the off chance they may find it offensive.
 
sars said:
john-e89 said:
You're not giving them a choice though are you, by putting that image up it means if anyone wants to view the thread they see a potentially inappropriate image like it or not, that's not a choice. The only choice they have is to read the thread or not and if they do want to read it and click on it it's too late, they've seen it, that is'nt choice. I just cannot understand what the problem is not having an image of that nature on that thread, just don't have it, simple, take any doubt away, there's plenty of space on the rest of the forum for that, it's simple logic. The mods are human and if they did'nt see any problem with Perry's image for that thread then no disrespect to them but I don't agree with them.

ONE thread only has to stay clean, that is all, it's easy.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

With that rationale, any forum member who has a signature or avatar that can be construed as inappropriate or offensive (and there are more than a few), should not reply to that post or perhaps change their signature or avatar to accommodate any guest on the off chance they may find it offensive.[/quote)

Replying to the charity thread yes that's a good point and I can't argue with it, nor have I got a solution other than yes ok I guess people will just have to accept what they see, like it or not. Still no need to put the original image up though, I stand by that.
 
John002 said:
.are we still discussing shagging a bear?
Click to expand...
Nah!, we've pretty much decided that we're adults and shagging a bear is fine... now we're haggling over the price.... :P
 
lux said:
Get with it John, we're onto selling a moody Omega for 2 grand now!
Click to expand...

Come home from work and it's all kicking off, pot bellied bears and cheap watches, Don't tell you know who though :exitright:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom