That's a yes then?Why do you ask? You already know the answer.![]()
Just checking. thank you.
That's a yes then?Why do you ask? You already know the answer.![]()
A clear NO!That's a yes then?
Just checking. thank you.
The intended function of this module is to drive these two handbrake motors. If the EMF works fine, you can activate/deactivate the brakes with a good tester. If the module is dead like above, there is no communication possible between tester and EMF.@RobbiZ4 - would a code reader with the ability to wind back the rear brakes for pad swaps etc be able to release the handbrake, or does that go through that damaged module?
Why do you ask? You already know the answer.![]()
I meant yes to it needing to pass through the control module. So i was violently agreeing with you.A clear NO!
The intended function of this module is to drive these two handbrake motors. If the EMF works fine, you can activate/deactivate the brakes with a good tester. If the module is dead like above, there is no communication possible between tester and EMF.
One thing is for sure with our cars: hardly anything is simple to fix....agreeing with you.![]()


No answer.Did you seal the 3rd hole in the body, that typically stays open for water if new backlights get installed?
E89: Collection of the 9 typical age-related defects in the roof environment
Nonsense!Olso, I still have water going inside the BOOT! I will search if there is a thread about this but it gets me crazy!
I think I will seal the Modules in the back so that the water doesnt get to them anymore...
The correct partnumber should be taken from realoem:Can I buy one that has a different part number?
Correct....the rear breaks still work, right? I mean the EMF only managed the parking break, correct?
Would be interesting if that F10 module will work at all in the E89....so I attempted to "transplant" the PCB from my EMF to a F10 EMF case that has the same design and that was in very good condition.
The main red wire incorrectly routed was the subject of the recall..looks like a broken wire / dodgy connectionHello, It has been a long month but I think I got to the bottom of the cars electric problem.
I changed the EMF ( ordered one from UK that never got delivered so I attempted to "transplant" the PCB from my EMF to a F10 EMF case that has the same design and that was in very good condition - if you think you would like to see how it went I will post a message about it ) and the parking break works fine.
The only thing that keeps happening is that I find the car "dead" sometimes. the key doesnt work, nothing that is electric work. If I connect the jump starter to the terminals under the hood it shows that it draind ( goes from 100% to 70-75% in about 6 minutes ) but the car doesnt wake up.
The only thing that makes it wake up is if I "jiggle" the Junction box ( passenger footwell ). Its clearly not a solution but I got it working whenever I found it dead. One of the last time this happened I didn't connect the jump starter and I only touched the JBE a bit and everything went on! The car started without skipping a heartbeat....so I dont suspect the battery dying overnight ( I also purchased a battery tester and the next time this happened, without cranking the engine I tested the batterys CCA. I have a 70Ah battery, so 760A and the reading showed 716 A. Did the reading a few more times in consecutive days with the car not being driven and the CCA is in the same range. So battery is good!)
Last evening I wanted to see if the car is fine, it was not so I wanted to take a more carefull approach and try to touch one cable at a time on the JBE to see which one is the problem. The first ting i touched and moved a bit was the B+ Terminal ( thick red wire that feeds the JBE ) and the car woke up immediately.
Got home and started to search about this and found out that the first years production Z4 E89 had some recalls regarding this exact problem (https://www.bmwparklane.co.uk/content/bmw-recall-information/ . Also found a thread here that says the recall had cars up to sept.2011 in the recall - https://z4-forum.com/threads/e89-10-recall-notice.124384/ ) . I called BMW Bucharest this morning, they told me that there is no recall for my VIN number but that there are E90 models from that period that had recalls ( and apparently have similar electronics ) and I set up an appointment to check the JBE.
I will get back to you with info after next thursdays visit!
Have a great weekend!
No, I didnt install the F10 EMF in the Z4. I only used the casing and installed the Z4 PCB in the F10 EMF case.Would be interesting if that F10 module will work at all in the E89



The Z4 PCB mounted onto the F10 EMF case.

That is what I was not able to achieve. That's the reason I developed the workaround with the external wiring and fuse.I also removed all the wires on the conenctor that goes into the EMF in order to clean them and take the pin that was missing from the original EMF case:
She changed her mind when BMW gave me the quote for the module and its programming.But didn't your wife insist on a new module
I wanted to film it but I had no idea what I was doing with those spreaded pins so I forgot about setting the GoPro. I have some pictures and I can try and explain how I managed to get the PCB out.How did you manage to get all those spreaded pins out of the PCB?




@RobbiZ4 your Z4-Tower is truly a thing of beauty.....Would be interesting if that F10 module will work at all in the E89.
I assume, there are different characteristic matrix fields programmed into as the brakes are different.
Update & reminder 4 me:
to test my (already bought years ago) F10 EMF in my Z4-Tower, if it can be aproached or even re-programmed with ISTA/P.
OMG, in my mind "a beauty" might be sth different, like ...@RobbiZ4 your Z4-Tower is truly a thing of beauty.....
