After reading the posts about Adebolajo & Adebowale and also remembering how we got rid of Abu Hanzer (hook hands) it got me thinking. We as a nation got rid of Hook hands for preaching terrorism and inciting terrorist acts against the British public...but when Gerry Adams did the exact same....we made him an MP....how is this right? What is the difference between an Irish guy preaching hatred and violence against us and a Muslim guy doing the same thing? I think we were right to get rid of hook and and should of done the same with Adams.
Can someone explain....
- Thread starter Hunter
- Start date
Hunter said:
Theres a man looking to start a heated debate ....... Personally I feel the same way .... And dont forget McGuiness
Can I throw Jabba the Hut AKA Alex Salmond into that ship too...
I agree 100% with you, however i think the difference is Gerry Adams is from Northern Ireland so technically a British Citizen and therefore we cannot deport him anywhere.
teamemmenracing said:
I think that we decided he was better inside the tent pissing out ....
fundamentally, I agree that having terrorists in positions of power dosen't seem right, but the democratic process is proven.....
Gerry Adams is among the most powerful public speakers I have ever listened to - far better than the majority of our politicians that defy memory when out of sight for 10 seconds - (i dont agree with his stance on violence btw ), thats why we banned his voice from British broadcasting - people might have listened to him
marchantsuk said:
^^^ this.