Brake pads upgrade - sensor and metal clip??

NathanZ4C

Member
I've just striped the brake calliper down to install so new pads. However I've found there is a clip on the rear of the piston side and a cut out for the brake pad sensor. The new pads have neither.

How imperative is it I have both or can I install without the clip and tie the sensor out of the way? These were by no means cheap pads so they are good quality. They are intended for hard street and track use.

uru6yduv.jpg
 
You will need to transfer the clip .. It keeps the pad central within the piston - clips into the piston with it ...

The sensor not in use won't be a problem, tie it out of the way so no warnings pop up and just check the pad wear yourself or via services etc
 
Cheers tom. The retaining clip may prize off with a bit of force and if I can break the rivet.

Can these be purchased separate from anywhere (just searched eBay and couldn't find any) and what's the best solution to reattach them?

I'm thinking pop riveting them perhaps?
 
The clip is more anti rattle than anything else. It can't move due to the lugs at each end.

What make are they?
 
Carbone Lorraine RC5+

I was just tempted to fit them and see how I get on but I'm a little reluctant when it comes to brakes.

I just wasn't sure how fundamental the clip is
 
On what basis do you suggest that? Other than their website is wrong and they have no clip?

I've checked the pads and they fit in the hangers ok
 
If your using those pads on a road car,they are the wrong pads ! No guide clips & sensor slots or rattle shims. These are track pads & not suitable for daily driver. I used similar ones on my old 335d had them fitted for a week then binned them !
 
I have just replaced my Carbone Lorraine RC6+ pads. They will fit fine, HOWEVER, if they are anything like the RC6's then they will squeal horrifically. The will also rattle about a lot. They are definitely not everyday usage friendly. Infact, they are absolutely terrible for everyday use. The worst thing about them is none of what I have already mentioned. It's actually how harsh on your discs they are. They completely destroyed my almost brand new discs. I got 3 trackdays and about 3000miles out of the pads and a brand new set of discs. I will never, ever use the pads again, although I cannot fault their performance. They were absolutely incredible.
 
RC5+ will squeal far less than the RC6, however, they are certainly a very track oriented pad. They will perform fine on the road, though possibly a little dead from cold.
 
I spoke to my supplier and he's confirmed that the RC6 is a very different pad. The RC5+ was developed to reduce squeal and dust of that compared to previous designs.

I've gone for it and installed the front pads and new discs (with the intention of doing the rears next weekend) I've managed to do probably 20 miles and wow the stopping power even from cold is probably 3/4 times better than the pads that were on there and they still had a lot of meat left on them still.

Warranted there is a bit of squeal from braking at over 40mph and when they have warmed up. Seems that stopping at anything from 30mph and you don't hear a peep from them.

Be interesting to see what things are like once properly bedded in.

I've got some adhesive rubber rubber backing pads to put on the back of the pads but I could only get the one side on due to a lack of space. Once the pads have worn a little ill look to get the other side on which should help with any squeal I'm getting.
 
I've been using RC5+ pads for quite some time now, both on my previous 2.5i and my current Z4MR.
Main advantage : HUGE stopping power. These pads can bite ! and the more you ask them, the more they give.
Main drawback : god how they SQUEAL doing that. They squeal, they groan... not always, not at every stop, but i found it sometimes painful to drive them in town.
Plus, the design of the pads allows them for some motion inside the caliper, they don't fit exactly in the caliper as OEM pads, they are maybe 1 mm shorter in every direction than is required. My guess is that it allows for more heat expansion than OEM. Downside is that the pads will rattle on uneven roads. That can get tiresome also.

My advice : for road use, get a decent set of OEM-like pads (i'm running on Brembo Sport pads now) which won't rattle, groan, squeal and make your life miserable, and use RC5+ pads for the track, because they are THAT good.
 
Shooter said:
I've been using RC5+ pads for quite some time now, both on my previous 2.5i and my current Z4MR.
Main advantage : HUGE stopping power. These pads can bite ! and the more you ask them, the more they give.
Main drawback : god how they SQUEAL doing that. They squeal, they groan... not always, not at every stop, but i found it sometimes painful to drive them in town.
Plus, the design of the pads allows them for some motion inside the caliper, they don't fit exactly in the caliper as OEM pads, they are maybe 1 mm shorter in every direction than is required. My guess is that it allows for more heat expansion than OEM. Downside is that the pads will rattle on uneven roads. That can get tiresome also.

My advice : for road use, get a decent set of OEM-like pads (i'm running on Brembo Sport pads now) which won't rattle, groan, squeal and make your life miserable, and use RC5+ pads for the track, because they are THAT good.

As a matter of interest what model number pads you running up front? They didnt list them for the Z4 3.0 but the ones i installed were rather sung and couldnt imagine them rattling about.

Yes they do squeal a little. Its only a matter of time before i work out if thats a) too much for normal road use b) if the backing pads ive got on the piston side will reduce the squeal when installed on the other side. They havent squealed enough to make me want to remove them but they havent really bedded in fully yet
 
For the 2.5i roadster, i ordered a set of "4104 CL BRAKES - Brake Pads - Front Compound: RC5+" from Murray Motorpsort.
AFAIK, the brake pads are the same between 2.5i and 3.0i.
 
I had the 4104's sent to me first but they didnt fit. I then had a set of 4033 and they were fine.

Squeal is there once you have a bit of heat in them, i havent heard them rattle yet.

They are still bedding in but ill report more in a few 100 miles
 
Why would you even fit such a pad to a road car, unless you're planning lots of track use?
Squeal, rattle due to size and no anti rattle spring, no wear sensor and some indicate a tendency of such pads to eat discs. Even their own review states 'Intended for track day cars that see road miles'.

I'm not criticising, just trying to understand what the point is Vs a decent road pad
 
cj10jeeper said:
Why would you even fit such a pad to a road car, unless you're planning lots of track use?
Squeal, rattle due to size and no anti rattle spring, no wear sensor and some indicate a tendency of such pads to eat discs. Even their own review states 'Intended for track day cars that see road miles'.

I'm not criticising, just trying to understand what the point is Vs a decent road pad

+1......?
 
So this is how the story goes… I wanted to replace my discs, not because they were completely gone (as they had plenty of meat on them) but one was slightly scored and they ‘looked’ a little rubbish on the none contact surfaces. This led me to start looking for a new disc and pad setup.

I’ve previous ran both GreenStuff and YellowStuff on my old car. The Yellow stuff being the far better pad however I was still able to induce some pretty terrifying brake fade on a trip to the Nurburgring. I was therefore looking for something with a decent amount of stopping power maybe to do the odd track day and to give me confidence when I was pushing the car hard.

Ill be the first to admit that the majority of changes I did to my last car made it uncomfortable to drive on the road. With uprated coilovers, drop links, anti roll bars, rear upper and lower bracing, a massive center brace cover most of the car, front upper and lower bracing and Yoko AD08 tyres it could be harsh/stiff at times and it was certainly more prepped for the track than the road. That said I was happy with the set up, it was by far the best handling car I had driven, I was confident with it and when I wanted to push the car hard I could. The brakes could have been better but with braided lines, good pads, discs and fluid, I felt id done a pretty good job with what I had and compared to stock the setup it was far superior.

I have a friend who runs Carbone Lorraine pads on his track car and has really rated them, he put me in contact with a rep. The RC5 pads had a bit of a bad reputation from the reviews ive seen, the RC6 pads are pretty aggressive and with my friends car running RC8’s I know how noisy and brutal they can be.

The RC5+ was derived to solve some of the previous complaints about the RC5 pad, mainly the horrible dust off them and secondly the noise. I accept these are an aggressive pad compared to stock. But I was always going to go for something better than stock. Better is obviously subjective.

The other reason why I got these pads was that I got them for a very good price and not much more than I would have paid for YellowStuff. Warranted I wasn’t aware they wouldn’t have the retaining clip but I believe that any noise im getting from the brakes now, which is not all the time, is possibly because of the contact (friction) between the surface of the pad material and the disc, rather than as ill fitting pad or the usual brake squeal. I certainly haven’t had any rattling or any play when the pads were being installed. There is no way I would have installed a loose pad with 1mm gap.

Another thing to consider is that I also seen pads behave very differently from car to car and from brake setup to brake setup. Pads that have no noise when sitting in a TVR calliper on one car and the same pads in the same TVR calliper on another TVR that are noisy as hell. Same pads, same calliper, different cars.

Looking at Carbon Lorraines spiel it reads as follows…

‘A highly versatile compound that has a wide range of applications, especially if lower brake dust and squeal are a priority. RC5+ are kinder on discs and still offer fantastic stopping power, and are perfect for use with treaded tyres on trackdays. This compound has the lowest co-efficiency in the range, and can be used with other CL Brake pads to find your perfect level of brake balance without the need of fitting a brake bias.’

‘The CL Brakes RC5+ has a moderate friction level (friction coefficient of μ=0.4) making it extremely versatile. Its perfect for cars running road spec tyres allowing high power braking without accidently locking the brakes. The CL Brakes RC5+ can be used in low grip situations such as mud, gravel, snow etc or when you have too much bias on an axle, for example to stop the rear brake discs locking under heavy braking.. CL Brakes RC5+ brake pads give low noise, low dust and disc wear and work well in low temperature conditions.’

I accept ive took a bit of a punt on them. They are probably more track bias. I might end up hating them but so far I can live with the noise that comes from them when they decide to let me know they are there. Whether or not the brake dust is like the devils sperm or they are going to chew through the discs or not as much as people (who haven’t ran the RC5+’s) say or that the squeal is going to get better or worse is still to be confirmed but id brought the pads by then and wanted to see if they could handle daily use. My only other option at that point was to sell the pads without trying them and buying something more stockish.

As I say a few hundred miles and they will be properly bed in and I can tell you more about my experience.


Edit* Oooohhh i see your at the Midland meet the weekend... maybe we can have a 'stop off' 60-0 :poke:
 
Good explanation.
I'd put normal pads on the swap to these for a ring trip.
60-0 - no contest if you have oem calipers. I fitted the much larger E46 330 discs, carriers and pads. Stops On a dime.
 
Back
Top Bottom