I see your point Carol but I'm just saying that I don't see it as such a big issue as the examples you have mentioned. To me, a better example would be if the car was advertised with 1-touch up/down windows but the feature wasnt present. It's something that's nice to have but you dont really need. You just get on with enjoying the car.Carol M wrote:Difficulty in adapting isn't the point really. The point is that the car was advertised/sold with a function that wasn't actually present on 4 cylinder models.
Would it be ok then to advertise the car as having abs and then it doesn't come with it or electric windows and then the car has wind up windows or buying an m sport model and then being told it doesn't come in m sport or....... you get the point.
We could drive without abs or electric windows or a non m sport but these cars were sold and advertised as coming with a function, which you could argue and quite rightly so, we paid for and they don't have it. Why is that ok?
That's why I have no problem with people claiming compensation. I just don't see why it has become such a major issue for some and why they've spent so much time fighting for something I view as fairly trivial.
Just my 10p worth and I appreciate we all have different opinions on this.