Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

Mileage

2003 - 2009, roadster, coupe, facelift
Post Reply
gianni_cauchi
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:48 am

Mileage

Post by gianni_cauchi » Wed Apr 24, 2024 10:09 am

Might be able to get my hands on a 2007 2.0i, but mileage is about 75k miles (120k km) is it worth looking at? What is the limit for when z4's of this gen become problematic

mmm-five
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 12731
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:03 pm
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Mileage

Post by mmm-five » Wed Apr 24, 2024 10:33 am

It entirely depends on how it's been maintained.

If it's been looked after, then 300,000 miles may not be an issue. If it hasn't, then 30,000 miles might have ruined it.
Trigger’s Z4MC
Some bits now over 163,000 miles, some less than 1,000 miles.
Individual Ruby Black, Individual extended champagne leather, plus many options

Image

User avatar
ryushe
Member
Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:57 am
Location: Rotterdam, NL

Mileage

Post by ryushe » Wed Apr 24, 2024 10:48 am

Might be worth having a read through this post as well. Some good discussion there on the price/mileage/quality relationship.

But as mentioned above, a lot depends on how the previous owners have treated the car of course.
'06 E85 Z4 3.0si 6 speed manual - Black metallic w/ champagne interior
Prev BMWs: '04 E85 Z4 Individual 2.5i • '04 E85 Z4 3.0i • '04 E46 M3 • '04 E61 535d • '86 E28 525i • '87 E28 528e

raymond.harper
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1013
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 12:30 am

Mileage

Post by raymond.harper » Wed Apr 24, 2024 11:32 am

My personal view is that the 2.0 is not perhaps the best engine in terms of reliability/ desireability. It may be a good car but post the details of the possible purchase on the forum so members can give you their opinions.

Online
STC_Zed
Member
Member
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2024 10:15 pm

Mileage

Post by STC_Zed » Wed Apr 24, 2024 1:58 pm

Mileage is just a number, at the age these cars are maintenance and condition is far more important. I’d far rather a higher mileage example that’s ignored BMW’s ridiculous long oil change intervals, changed gearbox oil etc than a low mileage car that’s stuck religiously to BMW’s service schedule.

User avatar
buzyg
Legend
Legend
Posts: 26569
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 6:11 pm
Location: Cornwall

Mileage

Post by buzyg » Thu Apr 25, 2024 9:40 am

By on condition every time. These cars take the miles well, as long as they are maintained properly.
Image

User avatar
enuff_zed
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 14911
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:05 am
Location: Attleborough, Norfolk

Mileage

Post by enuff_zed » Thu Apr 25, 2024 11:17 am

STC_Zed wrote: Wed Apr 24, 2024 1:58 pm Mileage is just a number, at the age these cars are maintenance and condition is far more important. I’d far rather a higher mileage example that’s ignored BMW’s ridiculous long oil change intervals, changed gearbox oil etc than a low mileage car that’s stuck religiously to BMW’s service schedule.
I would agree in principle for the straight sixes, but there are more 4-pots showing issues over 100k: at least, as reported on the forum.
Whether this is an inherent issue, lack of maintenance or simply people thrashing them I don't know.
They have their advocates on here as well.
I have run a couple and the balance is great for back-road driving.

In short, my personal opinion is that for peace of mind at higher mileages, with all other factors being equal, a 6-pot would be a better choice.
HQ of 'Norfolk Zed Rescue'.
Always happy to help if I can.

If the forum helped you, why not help the forum back. Thats the Z4 way! :thumbsup:
Image

Post Reply