Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

Better than an M ?

"M" Specific discussion
User avatar
ben g
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 7858
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:20 pm
Location: Essex

Better than an M ?

Post by ben g » Fri Apr 20, 2018 10:36 pm

The fact he's wearing a floral shirt is enough to make me put the x in the corner :lol:

Nice car though :thumbsup:
Red Soft-top Sterling grey 3.0i - Z4M Front, Eibachs, Polybushed, Clear headlights, Triple clear spot rear lights, Shadow Chrome 107's, Sport MFSW, ZHP.

User avatar
Yorkie Z
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2594
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 9:19 pm
Location: Plymouth

Better than an M ?

Post by Yorkie Z » Wed Apr 25, 2018 9:14 am

Just had this pop up on my phone and thought some of you guys might be interested. Not the best review in the world but but it's only 15 mins.

Think I'll stick with the M/// :poke:

https://youtu.be/UKcrXd2K0IA
Last edited by Wondermike on Wed Apr 25, 2018 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Duplicates merged
A Dirty M///

john-e89
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 11058
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:27 pm

E89 35is vs ZM review

Post by john-e89 » Wed Apr 25, 2018 12:11 pm

Two things he got wrong....he said at the start it’s a sports car... :rtfm: Ermmmm...no..... :wink:

2nd, he said it needed the tracking sorting out....ermmmm....no....that’s how they are.... :driving:

Other than that he’s spot on imho.

Exactly why I got a pigster.

Still very very good cars though. :driving:
M roady...OEM CSL’s, strut brace, Remus back boxes, ZHP
MR2 MK 2
E89 35i project car...mapped 365bhp, M4 stoppers & wheels, KWV3’s, H&R front ARB, M3 front arms, strut brace Eisenmann cat back race exhaust, VRSF downpipes inbound
E89 35is
G29

extaz
Member
Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 2:48 pm

E89 35is vs ZM review

Post by extaz » Wed Apr 25, 2018 1:23 pm

There seems to be this extreme dichotomy with so many reviewers and owners liking the E89 but saying it wanders or it is tail happy or whatever. Meanwhile , I know stock E89s to be very enjoyable on back roads with very good balance and adhesion, and even being used for track-time (here in the USA). I have explored the limits rather thoroughly but they are foolishly high for public roads. There is certainly no wander. So I wonder what is the issue with some of them? Perhaps it is the combination of the M adaptable suspension and the tires which are the variables. And in case you are wondering, I have owned, and tracked a variety of cars including Porsche. Also I am not saying it is the ultimate track handling car. It may be the ultimate enjoyable, all weather, versatile, sports, roadster/coupe.

User avatar
JayEmm
Member
Member
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 7:30 pm

Better than an M ?

Post by JayEmm » Wed Apr 25, 2018 2:17 pm

mr wilks wrote: Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:37 pm Never mind the cars , who the foook is that Rolf Harris tribute act driving the car & chunnering through his nose :? what a goon :cry:
That would be me
------------
James Martin - aka "JayEmm"
Director of Photography (Cameraman)
History: E46 M3 LSB, Z4 MC, '05 E46 330Ci Clubsport, 645Ci, '96 911 Targa, '99 911 C4

User avatar
JayEmm
Member
Member
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 7:30 pm

E89 35is vs ZM review

Post by JayEmm » Wed Apr 25, 2018 2:19 pm

US, UK and European roads all vary greatly.

On many of the roads I have driven in the USA, there'd be nothing wrong at all with how the E89 is setup.

UK roads are something quite special indeed.
------------
James Martin - aka "JayEmm"
Director of Photography (Cameraman)
History: E46 M3 LSB, Z4 MC, '05 E46 330Ci Clubsport, 645Ci, '96 911 Targa, '99 911 C4

User avatar
ph001
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 3870
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:53 pm
Location: N. Yorkshire.

Better than an M ?

Post by ph001 » Wed Apr 25, 2018 4:34 pm

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
2007 E85 Z4 3.0Si manual :driving:
19" CSL's | Eibach Springs | Aeroskirts | Z4M front bumper | Clear brake light | ZHP | RCH+| Stubby

2004 E46 M3 coupe manual - gone but not forgotten.

Image

User avatar
mr wilks
Legend
Legend
Posts: 21897
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:02 pm
Location: Lancashire

Better than an M ?

Post by mr wilks » Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:13 pm

JayEmm wrote: Wed Apr 25, 2018 2:17 pm
mr wilks wrote: Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:37 pm Never mind the cars , who the foook is that Rolf Harris tribute act driving the car & chunnering through his nose :? what a goon :cry:

That would be me
Well i'm sure you are used to criticism by now , i found it amateurish , lame & didn't engage me at all :( though the DCT description did give me a laugh :oops: & for those who were thinking of upgrading to a 35is at least they will know it makes a "pleasant" noise
i don't waste a lot of my time watching youtube car reviews but here's one for comparison https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8i0RLro4Hmw
3 ZMRs
3 E89s
5 Si coupes
5 Si roadsters
997 C4
TTRS
F82 M4
MK7 Golf Gti
current Bmw 6 Gran Turismo

User avatar
step_change
Member
Member
Posts: 737
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 4:21 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

E89 35is vs ZM review

Post by step_change » Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:17 pm

I love mine. Best car I have ever had.
Gone :( : 2013 35is, Melbourne Red, DCT, Nav, Comfort pack
Gone: 2007 2.5is, Montego Blue, Auto, Nav

john-e89
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 11058
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:27 pm

E89 35is vs ZM review

Post by john-e89 » Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:28 pm

extaz wrote: Wed Apr 25, 2018 1:23 pm There seems to be this extreme dichotomy with so many reviewers and owners liking the E89 but saying it wanders or it is tail happy or whatever. Meanwhile , I know stock E89s to be very enjoyable on back roads with very good balance and adhesion, and even being used for track-time (here in the USA). I have explored the limits rather thoroughly but they are foolishly high for public roads. There is certainly no wander. So I wonder what is the issue with some of them? Perhaps it is the combination of the M adaptable suspension and the tires which are the variables. And in case you are wondering, I have owned, and tracked a variety of cars including Porsche. Also I am not saying it is the ultimate track handling car. It may be the ultimate enjoyable, all weather, versatile, sports, roadster/coupe.
There just seems to be a fundamental mistake in its chassis somewhere, even on premium non run flats there’s very little steering feel, and with the 35is I found an unnerving understeer then snap oversteer which to me felt like weight transfer, I’ve likened it to a tank of water in the boot sloshing from one side to the other. Maybe it’s the roof weight high up in the car. Really spoils the car. I’ve no idea how you would dial it out, I suspect you couldn’t, it’s just too heavy with this chassis design fault.

Such a shame as it looks great, fab interior, goes like stink, fantastic engine and DCT in the 35 models. Agonised over selling mine for over a year, loved it but was ultimately disappointed. That said if you don’t mind a non pin sharp light car there’s little to to better them as an everyday fast open top roadster.

All just imo obviously.
M roady...OEM CSL’s, strut brace, Remus back boxes, ZHP
MR2 MK 2
E89 35i project car...mapped 365bhp, M4 stoppers & wheels, KWV3’s, H&R front ARB, M3 front arms, strut brace Eisenmann cat back race exhaust, VRSF downpipes inbound
E89 35is
G29

User avatar
mr wilks
Legend
Legend
Posts: 21897
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:02 pm
Location: Lancashire

E89 35is vs ZM review

Post by mr wilks » Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:32 pm

Same review has already surfaced here viewtopic.php?f=9&t=105352

I ran my 35i (remapped) with MPSS on H&Rs with stock geo , was never or will ever be either a ZMC ZMR or Boxster but they can be driven fast & they can & do corner & handle very well indeed :driving: a 3 day Normandy trip with ZMs & a Alpina the twinturbo easily held its own & never once lost composure or felt like it was reaching the edge of its capabilities & we were often into 3 numbers :evil:
3 ZMRs
3 E89s
5 Si coupes
5 Si roadsters
997 C4
TTRS
F82 M4
MK7 Golf Gti
current Bmw 6 Gran Turismo

Online
User avatar
Lynchy
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 3816
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:31 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

E89 35is vs ZM review

Post by Lynchy » Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:36 pm

We were going easy on you mr wilks :wink:

User avatar
mr wilks
Legend
Legend
Posts: 21897
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:02 pm
Location: Lancashire

E89 35is vs ZM review

Post by mr wilks » Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:36 pm

Lynchy wrote: Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:36 pm We were going easy on you mr wilks :wink:
You were behind :P
3 ZMRs
3 E89s
5 Si coupes
5 Si roadsters
997 C4
TTRS
F82 M4
MK7 Golf Gti
current Bmw 6 Gran Turismo

Online
User avatar
Lynchy
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 3816
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:31 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

E89 35is vs ZM review

Post by Lynchy » Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:38 pm

I know, we let you lead so we didn't lose you

User avatar
JayEmm
Member
Member
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 7:30 pm

Better than an M ?

Post by JayEmm » Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:59 pm

Can't win them all!

Thanks for watching in any case. I wish I could have reviewed my Z4 M, but I wasnt running the channel when I had it. So much better than my E46, and so much worse at the same time. A car truly full of character traits... and defects!
------------
James Martin - aka "JayEmm"
Director of Photography (Cameraman)
History: E46 M3 LSB, Z4 MC, '05 E46 330Ci Clubsport, 645Ci, '96 911 Targa, '99 911 C4

Post Reply