Should have been compared to a similarly priced Boxster S, but they only had access to a GTS (at a standard £14k extra or £23k extra as tested)...so no prizes for guessing what won.
https://www.pistonheads.com/features/ph ... -gts/40039
Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.
Pistonheads review vs Boxster GTS
-
- Lifer
- Posts: 12722
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:03 pm
- Location: Liverpool
- Contact:
-
- Lifer
- Posts: 11051
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:27 pm
Pistonheads review vs Boxster GTS
As I was telling the sales chaps at the launch I wanted the new Zed to be close enough to the Boxster that it didn’t matter, so saving a fair chunk, but alas it wasn’t to be, not even close, in fact so far apart the Zed wasn’t even a consideration no matter how hard I tried to like it. I agree with the review about the Boxy’s interior, it’s nice, nothing more, the seats with the 18 way adjustables added are far superior though and sit you in a cocoon with a pretty perfect driving position. It’s agility, light feel, steering feel, and sheer dynamics trounce the Zed imho even as good as the Zed chassis is.
More money, a lot more infact but when you drive it it makes perfect sense.....if spending that much can ever make sense......
More money, a lot more infact but when you drive it it makes perfect sense.....if spending that much can ever make sense......
M roady...OEM CSL’s, strut brace, Remus back boxes, ZHP
MR2 MK 2
E89 35i project car...mapped 365bhp, M4 stoppers & wheels, KWV3’s, H&R front ARB, M3 front arms, strut brace Eisenmann cat back race exhaust, VRSF downpipes inbound
E89 35is
G29
MR2 MK 2
E89 35i project car...mapped 365bhp, M4 stoppers & wheels, KWV3’s, H&R front ARB, M3 front arms, strut brace Eisenmann cat back race exhaust, VRSF downpipes inbound
E89 35is
G29