Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's - NOW WITH WHEEL WEIGHTS!!

Alloy wheels and tyre discussion
User avatar
markprz86
Member
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 2:24 pm

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's - NOW WITH WHEEL WEIGHTS!!

Post by markprz86 » Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:25 pm

Hi all,

I've done my best to search for a similar related topic, but not had much luck so far.

I'm looking at CSL replicas from BM Autosport and my query is:
What is the difference between the Atomic CSL wheels and Riva CSL wheels?

I can see that the offset is slightly different, other than this is one better quality? More accurate replica?

Thanks
Last edited by markprz86 on Wed Aug 22, 2018 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
R60BBA
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1776
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 7:53 pm
Location: London, United Kingdom

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by R60BBA » Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:06 pm

Buy them from CMWheels, they offer discount to Z4Forum members.
Current: 2002 E46 M3
Current: 2005 997 Carrera S
Gone: 2004 R53 Cooper S
Gone: 1998 E31 840Ci Sport
Gone: 2007 Z4 E86 3.0Si Sport
Gone: 2001 Z3 E36/7 2.2i San Remo Individual
Gone: 2015 F21 116d M Sport
Gone: 2012 A3 Sportback 1.2TFSI

User avatar
mr wilks
Legend
Legend
Posts: 21897
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:02 pm
Location: Lancashire

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by mr wilks » Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:14 pm

Riva usually 8j 9j , Atomic 8.5j 9.5j , on Si i would go for the Riva for this reason alone , if you do decide the wider widths work for you then pay the extra for the Veemann FS34 :roll: quality is a massive step up for not much more spend , ive had the others & currently have the 34s :thumbsup:

Image
Attachments
20180720_175907-01.jpeg
20180720_175907-01.jpeg (249.27 KiB) Viewed 3436 times
3 ZMRs
3 E89s
5 Si coupes
5 Si roadsters
997 C4
TTRS
F82 M4
MK7 Golf Gti
current Bmw 6 Gran Turismo

User avatar
markprz86
Member
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 2:24 pm

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by markprz86 » Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:26 pm

Thanks for the info, however I like the OEM look (I know they are replicas) and have always liked Z4's on CSLs.

So the Atomics being wider than the Riva's, what is the upshot of this?

Cheers
Last edited by markprz86 on Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mr wilks
Legend
Legend
Posts: 21897
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:02 pm
Location: Lancashire

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by mr wilks » Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:33 pm

markprz86 wrote: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:26 pm Thanks for the info, however I like to OEM look (I know they are replicas) and have always liked Z4's on CSLs.

So the Atomics being wider than the Riva's, what is the upshot of this?

Cheers
Upshot is if you lower the car & the offset on front is sub et40 then you're likely to hear the sound of rubber on plastic if you enjoy driving it :driving: or look closely at tyre size to avoid the problem :thumbsup:
3 ZMRs
3 E89s
5 Si coupes
5 Si roadsters
997 C4
TTRS
F82 M4
MK7 Golf Gti
current Bmw 6 Gran Turismo

jamie_z4
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 4621
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:38 pm

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by jamie_z4 » Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:05 pm

peddling veemans again Andy? :P
18 Z4s owned to date.

Current: 2.5i Titan silver

Daily driver: 480bhp M140i Shadow edition.

User avatar
Silverzedtom
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1478
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2017 8:19 pm
Location: East Sussex

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by Silverzedtom » Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:18 pm

I’ve got Atomic’s and think they are a great match. The paint finish isn’t great so I had them refurbed, I’m not the biggest fan of hyper silver anyway though to be honest.

I went for et38 fronts and an et33 rear and don’t get any rubbing with eibachs
E85 2.5si
F55 Cooper S

User avatar
markprz86
Member
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 2:24 pm

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by markprz86 » Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:24 am

mr wilks wrote: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:33 pm
markprz86 wrote: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:26 pm Thanks for the info, however I like to OEM look (I know they are replicas) and have always liked Z4's on CSLs.

So the Atomics being wider than the Riva's, what is the upshot of this?

Cheers
Upshot is if you lower the car & the offset on front is sub et40 then you're likely to hear the sound of rubber on plastic if you enjoy driving it :driving: or look closely at tyre size to avoid the problem :thumbsup:
So, If I had no intention of lowering it, then both Riva or Atomics would be fine.
If I did want to go lower, they would need to be Riva's.

Having owned the gen 1 and gen 2 Z4 convertibles, i'm not sure i'd want to go lower with the roads where I am!

Having done some research and comparison to the original m3 csl wheels, I would also tend to say that the Atomic's are a closer match to the original. :thumbsup:

User avatar
z4pilot
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1090
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:11 pm
Location: Lytham, Lancs

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by z4pilot » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:00 am

mr wilks wrote: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:33 pm
markprz86 wrote: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:26 pm Thanks for the info, however I like to OEM look (I know they are replicas) and have always liked Z4's on CSLs.

So the Atomics being wider than the Riva's, what is the upshot of this?

Cheers
Upshot is if you lower the car & the offset on front is sub et40 then you're likely to hear the sound of rubber on plastic if you enjoy driving it :driving: or look closely at tyre size to avoid the problem :thumbsup:
Had the Atomics (ET 38) on mine with Eibachs and agree with Mr Wilks - you will get rubbing at the front with fast road driving. Dropping down profile from 235 to 225 improved it greatly, and going to 215 might have solved it completely, but I didn't want the stretched look. If I went 19's again, I wouldn't go below a 40 ET, as waiting to hear the sound of tyre on arch liner over every bump ruined the driving experience for me.
Now Gone - 2008 Coupe, Montego Blue, Champagne leather and Piano Black interior, Eibachs & Koni Sport shocks, Style 230 19s, Eisenmann Quad - approaching perfection...

User avatar
R60BBA
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1776
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 7:53 pm
Location: London, United Kingdom

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by R60BBA » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:12 am

Or just run 18s and have no issues whatsoever plus a more sporty driving experience :P :driving:
Current: 2002 E46 M3
Current: 2005 997 Carrera S
Gone: 2004 R53 Cooper S
Gone: 1998 E31 840Ci Sport
Gone: 2007 Z4 E86 3.0Si Sport
Gone: 2001 Z3 E36/7 2.2i San Remo Individual
Gone: 2015 F21 116d M Sport
Gone: 2012 A3 Sportback 1.2TFSI

User avatar
markprz86
Member
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 2:24 pm

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by markprz86 » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:56 am

z4pilot wrote: Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:00 am
mr wilks wrote: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:33 pm
markprz86 wrote: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:26 pm Thanks for the info, however I like to OEM look (I know they are replicas) and have always liked Z4's on CSLs.

So the Atomics being wider than the Riva's, what is the upshot of this?

Cheers
Upshot is if you lower the car & the offset on front is sub et40 then you're likely to hear the sound of rubber on plastic if you enjoy driving it :driving: or look closely at tyre size to avoid the problem :thumbsup:
Had the Atomics (ET 38) on mine with Eibachs and agree with Mr Wilks - you will get rubbing at the front with fast road driving. Dropping down profile from 235 to 225 improved it greatly, and going to 215 might have solved it completely, but I didn't want the stretched look. If I went 19's again, I wouldn't go below a 40 ET, as waiting to hear the sound of tyre on arch liner over every bump ruined the driving experience for me.
From researching what other users were running, I was going for the following:
Front tyre: 225 35 19
Rear tyre: 265 35 19

Wheels Atomic CSLs
WIDTH: 8.5" Front / 9.5" Rear
OFFSET: et38 front / et45 rear

WITHOUT lowering the car.

Does that say rub city?

User avatar
mr wilks
Legend
Legend
Posts: 21897
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:02 pm
Location: Lancashire

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by mr wilks » Tue Aug 21, 2018 12:11 pm

markprz86 wrote: Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:56 am
z4pilot wrote: Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:00 am
mr wilks wrote: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:33 pm

Upshot is if you lower the car & the offset on front is sub et40 then you're likely to hear the sound of rubber on plastic if you enjoy driving it :driving: or look closely at tyre size to avoid the problem :thumbsup:
Had the Atomics (ET 38) on mine with Eibachs and agree with Mr Wilks - you will get rubbing at the front with fast road driving. Dropping down profile from 235 to 225 improved it greatly, and going to 215 might have solved it completely, but I didn't want the stretched look. If I went 19's again, I wouldn't go below a 40 ET, as waiting to hear the sound of tyre on arch liner over every bump ruined the driving experience for me.
From researching what other users were running, I was going for the following:
Front tyre: 225 35 19
Rear tyre: 265 35 19

Wheels Atomic CSLs
WIDTH: 8.5" Front / 9.5" Rear
OFFSET: et38 front / et45 rear

WITHOUT lowering the car.

Does that say rub city?
Id say all will be fine on the above info :thumbsup:
3 ZMRs
3 E89s
5 Si coupes
5 Si roadsters
997 C4
TTRS
F82 M4
MK7 Golf Gti
current Bmw 6 Gran Turismo

User avatar
markprz86
Member
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 2:24 pm

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by markprz86 » Tue Aug 21, 2018 1:03 pm

Excellent.
Thanks for the advice

Now to buy a Z4 Coupe.... :rofl:

User avatar
markprz86
Member
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 2:24 pm

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by markprz86 » Tue Aug 21, 2018 2:49 pm

Just spoken to both BM Autosport and CM Wheels regarding CSL replicas. Both have been very helpful and offered forum discount.

I didn't realise this, however, that the CM Wheels CSL's aren't the same as BM Atuosport Atomics. (my mistake)

I thought hey both stocked Atomic wheels (made in Taiwan), that were just at different price points.

CM Wheels are £510.00 delivered
BM Autosport are £615.00 delivered


Would the extra price mean better quality? I've seen a lot of posts from people expressing "You get what you pay for"

User avatar
Silverzedtom
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1478
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2017 8:19 pm
Location: East Sussex

CSL Atomics Vs Riva's

Post by Silverzedtom » Tue Aug 21, 2018 2:55 pm

markprz86 wrote: Tue Aug 21, 2018 2:49 pm Just spoken to both BM Autosport and CM Wheels regarding CSL replicas. Both have been very helpful and offered forum discount.

I didn't realise this, however, that the CM Wheels CSL's aren't the same as BM Atuosport Atomics. (my mistake)

I thought hey both stocked Atomic wheels (made in Taiwan), that were just at different price points.

CM Wheels are £510.00 delivered
BM Autosport are £615.00 delivered


Would the extra price mean better quality? I've seen a lot of posts from people expressing "You get what you pay for"
From what I can work out, Atomic went bust or at least disappeared for a while last year. Perhaps if this is correct there is old stock left?

I payed 6 something for mine from Bm Autosport. Can’t fault the wheels besides paint as per my other post above.

If they are the same sizes you could find out if there’s a difference in weight?

EDIT: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=99030&p=1450019&hil ... l#p1450019

Nearly sold them as they rubbed until I chanced putting a set of 255’s on (now rub free). Thought it might help to see pics of them fitted
E85 2.5si
F55 Cooper S

Post Reply