Fair enough. Thank you.R.E92 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 11:49 amThere might well be 2 per axle. I read the BMW technical brief for the stability and traction control which mentions the sensors on each axle so that could have meant that there are 4 in total.enuff_zed wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 10:04 am If there is only one speed sensor on each axle, how does the system sense that one wheel is spinning on that axle?
I'm probably being a bit thick, but on a RWD car, I would have thought it more important to monitor the differences in rotational speed between the two rear wheels than to compare them with the front?
(Not withstanding the obvious difference when cornering).
What is it I am missing please?
Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.
Overenthusiastic traction control?
- enuff_zed
- Lifer
- Posts: 14782
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:05 am
- Location: Attleborough, Norfolk
Overenthusiastic traction control?
- ph001
- Lifer
- Posts: 3870
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:53 pm
- Location: N. Yorkshire.
Overenthusiastic traction control?
It's done from the ABS sensor ring - so one per wheel.
DSC is more complex than that though as it also takes inputs from throttle position, steering angle, yaw and longitudinal acceleration.
DSC is more complex than that though as it also takes inputs from throttle position, steering angle, yaw and longitudinal acceleration.
Overenthusiastic traction control?
R.E92 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 11:49 amThere might well be 2 per axle. I read the BMW technical brief for the stability and traction control which mentions the sensors on each axle so that could have meant that there are 4 in total.enuff_zed wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 10:04 am If there is only one speed sensor on each axle, how does the system sense that one wheel is spinning on that axle?
I'm probably being a bit thick, but on a RWD car, I would have thought it more important to monitor the differences in rotational speed between the two rear wheels than to compare them with the front?
(Not withstanding the obvious difference when cornering).
What is it I am missing please?
According to the E89 BMW USA technical briefing document to help the various traction /stability states there are:
4 wheel sensors sensing speed of each wheel
A longtitudinal acceleration sensor
Front and rear ride height sensors
Yaw angle sensor
Rate of change of steering sensor
Steering torque sensor
Torque sensor on gearbox output
On 8 speed boxes torque sensor on gearbox input
Some of which are duplicated and ignoring any just used for electronic damping..
As others suggested with only rotational sensor per axle you could not easily verify a spinning wheel in a straight line
The ABS system works in tandem and automatically calculates/ corrects for asymmetrical wheel arrangements
From a design viewpoint it would be a waste of assets not to make use of the abs wheel sensors since they are already there ..
- R.E92
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:10 am
Overenthusiastic traction control?
The problem is that it doesn't adjust. Hence the plethora of topics across the likes of e90post stating that incorrect tyre sizes caused huge issues with traction control.Pbondar wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:15 pmR.E92 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 11:49 amThere might well be 2 per axle. I read the BMW technical brief for the stability and traction control which mentions the sensors on each axle so that could have meant that there are 4 in total.enuff_zed wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 10:04 am If there is only one speed sensor on each axle, how does the system sense that one wheel is spinning on that axle?
I'm probably being a bit thick, but on a RWD car, I would have thought it more important to monitor the differences in rotational speed between the two rear wheels than to compare them with the front?
(Not withstanding the obvious difference when cornering).
What is it I am missing please?
According to the E89 BMW USA technical briefing document to help the various traction /stability states there are:
4 wheel sensors sensing speed of each wheel
A longtitudinal acceleration sensor
Front and rear ride height sensors
Yaw angle sensor
Rate of change of steering sensor
Steering torque sensor
Torque sensor on gearbox output
On 8 speed boxes torque sensor on gearbox input
Some of which are duplicated and ignoring any just used for electronic damping..
As others suggested with only rotational sensor per axle you could not easily verify a spinning wheel in a straight line
The ABS system works in tandem and automatically calculates/ corrects for asymmetrical wheel arrangements
From a design viewpoint it would be a waste of assets not to make use of the abs wheel sensors since they are already there ..
The E89 shares a platform with the E90 and has interchangeable control units and sensors.
If you upsize the tyres on one axle then the car will see the front wheels going at different speeds to the rear. It doesn't know the actual vehicle speed, it has to calculate it based off the wheels rotations.
-
- Lifer
- Posts: 4621
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:38 pm
Overenthusiastic traction control?
Or you could just read my post regarding the duff abs rings on page 1 which is also really common on e90 Post etc
18 Z4s owned to date.
Current: 2.5i Titan silver
Daily driver: 480bhp M140i Shadow edition.
Current: 2.5i Titan silver
Daily driver: 480bhp M140i Shadow edition.
Overenthusiastic traction control?
R. E92..
I think you are wandering off the point...the OP has a bog stock 64 plate 20i auto E89....supplied by a main dealer and in warranty..
So he will have whatever bmw oem fitment wheels and tyres...so all within tolerances ...
Therefore your probable cause analysis was not valid given the car specifics..
In that context your original technical description was incorrect..
There may be issues arising from significantly asymmetrical set ups on E8x platforms...but that isn’t because there are only two wheel sensors...
The code that drives all these systems is not in the public domain so no one apart from BMW and their partners knows what hard and soft limits have been set up in the various computer systems..
The more I read how sophisticated and interlinked these myriad of systems are on the e89 the more wary I am of simple fixes or improvements that people suggest..
I think you are wandering off the point...the OP has a bog stock 64 plate 20i auto E89....supplied by a main dealer and in warranty..
So he will have whatever bmw oem fitment wheels and tyres...so all within tolerances ...
Therefore your probable cause analysis was not valid given the car specifics..
In that context your original technical description was incorrect..
There may be issues arising from significantly asymmetrical set ups on E8x platforms...but that isn’t because there are only two wheel sensors...
The code that drives all these systems is not in the public domain so no one apart from BMW and their partners knows what hard and soft limits have been set up in the various computer systems..
The more I read how sophisticated and interlinked these myriad of systems are on the e89 the more wary I am of simple fixes or improvements that people suggest..
-
- Lifer
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 8:27 pm
- Location: Stourbridge
Overenthusiastic traction control?
Perhaps it's just a broken wire that breaks when the wheels rise over the hump.
Try to see if just the front or rear sets it off.
Try to see if just the front or rear sets it off.
- ph001
- Lifer
- Posts: 3870
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:53 pm
- Location: N. Yorkshire.
Overenthusiastic traction control?
My best guess would be dodgy yaw sensor or acceleration sensor. The yaw ones do fail on the E46 occasionally and it’s probably the same sensor.
- R.E92
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:10 am
Overenthusiastic traction control?
My point is that he just needs to check his tyres out before jacking the car up for a full inspection. If OP has OEM tyre sizes and matching tyres across the axles then it's time to look elsewhere. Over active traction and stability control is something which people also notice when mixing runflat and normal tyres.Pbondar wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 5:43 pm R. E92..
I think you are wandering off the point...the OP has a bog stock 64 plate 20i auto E89....supplied by a main dealer and in warranty..
So he will have whatever bmw oem fitment wheels and tyres...so all within tolerances ...
Therefore your probable cause analysis was not valid given the car specifics..
In that context your original technical description was incorrect..
There may be issues arising from significantly asymmetrical set ups on E8x platforms...but that isn’t because there are only two wheel sensors...
The code that drives all these systems is not in the public domain so no one apart from BMW and their partners knows what hard and soft limits have been set up in the various computer systems..
The more I read how sophisticated and interlinked these myriad of systems are on the e89 the more wary I am of simple fixes or improvements that people suggest..
The problems I described are across the E89 chassis family. That includes the E89 Z4, all E9x 3 series models and the E8x 1 series models.
In fact having larger or smaller rear wheels is a problem on almost all cars with modern stability control systems.
I described an issue with mismatching tyres which perfectly fits the description and is present on all vehicles mentioned above. I don't know why this upsets you so much.
- Probocop
- Member
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:31 pm
- Location: Fife, Scotland
Overenthusiastic traction control?
I also think it's the ABS sensor. I had the same symptoms on my old E81 1 series. It progressed into the DSC flashing when turning (left or right depending on which sensor was bust)
2007 Z4M Coupé - Midnight Blue
1988 VW Transporter - Slate Blue
2008 E82 123d - Space Grey
2009 Abarth 500 Esseesse - Campovolo Grey
1988 VW Transporter - Slate Blue
2008 E82 123d - Space Grey
2009 Abarth 500 Esseesse - Campovolo Grey
- enuff_zed
- Lifer
- Posts: 14782
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:05 am
- Location: Attleborough, Norfolk
Overenthusiastic traction control?
I think the basic premise is, (as implied by R.E92), to always check the easiest things first and discount them before diving into complicated, potentially expensive stuff.R.E92 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 9:13 amMy point is that he just needs to check his tyres out before jacking the car up for a full inspection. If OP has OEM tyre sizes and matching tyres across the axles then it's time to look elsewhere. Over active traction and stability control is something which people also notice when mixing runflat and normal tyres.Pbondar wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 5:43 pm R. E92..
I think you are wandering off the point...the OP has a bog stock 64 plate 20i auto E89....supplied by a main dealer and in warranty..
So he will have whatever bmw oem fitment wheels and tyres...so all within tolerances ...
Therefore your probable cause analysis was not valid given the car specifics..
In that context your original technical description was incorrect..
There may be issues arising from significantly asymmetrical set ups on E8x platforms...but that isn’t because there are only two wheel sensors...
The code that drives all these systems is not in the public domain so no one apart from BMW and their partners knows what hard and soft limits have been set up in the various computer systems..
The more I read how sophisticated and interlinked these myriad of systems are on the e89 the more wary I am of simple fixes or improvements that people suggest..
The problems I described are across the E89 chassis family. That includes the E89 Z4, all E9x 3 series models and the E8x 1 series models.
In fact having larger or smaller rear wheels is a problem on almost all cars with modern stability control systems.
I described an issue with mismatching tyres which perfectly fits the description and is present on all vehicles mentioned above. I don't know why this upsets you so much.
Will only take 5 minutes to note the tyre sizes, stick them on the forum and get an answer.
Overenthusiastic traction control?
[/quote]
I think the basic premise is, (as implied by R.E92), to always check the easiest things first and discount them before diving into complicated, potentially expensive stuff.
Will only take 5 minutes to note the tyre sizes, stick them on the forum and get an answer.
[/quote]
I think we all agree that fault diagnosis, especially armchair diagnosis is that it’s based on probabilities...
Therefore a new 3 month old owner of a car bought from a main stream bmw dealer under a full warranty will NOT be supplied with non OEM wheels and non OEM tyres...in all probability
Therefore for an armchair diagnosis without any detailed information from the patient you would assume that it is NOT a tyre/wheel issue based on it being supplied by bmw
Therefore the fault, if it is a fault, must, based on probability lie elsewhere... I
The issue with all BBs is that people leap in, shoot from the hip without reading the original post properly or follow the chain before replying...
Yes i’ve done it too..
I think the basic premise is, (as implied by R.E92), to always check the easiest things first and discount them before diving into complicated, potentially expensive stuff.
Will only take 5 minutes to note the tyre sizes, stick them on the forum and get an answer.
[/quote]
I think we all agree that fault diagnosis, especially armchair diagnosis is that it’s based on probabilities...
Therefore a new 3 month old owner of a car bought from a main stream bmw dealer under a full warranty will NOT be supplied with non OEM wheels and non OEM tyres...in all probability
Therefore for an armchair diagnosis without any detailed information from the patient you would assume that it is NOT a tyre/wheel issue based on it being supplied by bmw
Therefore the fault, if it is a fault, must, based on probability lie elsewhere... I
The issue with all BBs is that people leap in, shoot from the hip without reading the original post properly or follow the chain before replying...
Yes i’ve done it too..
-
- Lifer
- Posts: 4621
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:38 pm
Overenthusiastic traction control?
Finally someone with some common sense...
18 Z4s owned to date.
Current: 2.5i Titan silver
Daily driver: 480bhp M140i Shadow edition.
Current: 2.5i Titan silver
Daily driver: 480bhp M140i Shadow edition.
- enuff_zed
- Lifer
- Posts: 14782
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:05 am
- Location: Attleborough, Norfolk
Overenthusiastic traction control?
I think the basic premise is, (as implied by R.E92), to always check the easiest things first and discount them before diving into complicated, potentially expensive stuff.
Will only take 5 minutes to note the tyre sizes, stick them on the forum and get an answer.
[/quote]
I think we all agree that fault diagnosis, especially armchair diagnosis is that it’s based on probabilities...
Therefore a new 3 month old owner of a car bought from a main stream bmw dealer under a full warranty will NOT be supplied with non OEM wheels and non OEM tyres...in all probability
Therefore for an armchair diagnosis without any detailed information from the patient you would assume that it is NOT a tyre/wheel issue based on it being supplied by bmw
Therefore the fault, if it is a fault, must, based on probability lie elsewhere... I
The issue with all BBs is that people leap in, shoot from the hip without reading the original post properly or follow the chain before replying...
Yes i’ve done it too..
[/quote]
Errr? So....are we violently agreeing
-
- Member
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2019 9:47 pm
Overenthusiastic traction control?
It's exactly that. Dropped it into Sytners this morning and they've just called me to say that's the issue. Apparently as it's corrosion it isn't covered under the 1 year warranty I got when buying the car...fun. (I only bought the car 3 months ago.) They said they're trying to contact BMW to get it done as a goodwill gesture, so fingers crossed.jamie_z4 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2019 11:19 pm It's more than likely the reluctor ring on the driveshaft. It's very well documented online and YouTube guides how to fix it, it's where the driveshaft rusts and bulges out the abs ring and it touches the sensor. It's happened to two of my z4s and is fixed by fitting new reluctor rings and new abs sensors if it's damaged them.
No need to disable a vital safety function which bmw provided in the first place, just get it fixed.
The mechanic I spoke to said the corrosion was quite bad, and implied that it may have been there even before I bought the car from them, so kinda concerning that they didn't pick that up when they do their multi-point checks? She says it's not safe to drive.
If BMW don't budge, any idea of how much I'll have to part with to sort the issue out?
E89 sDrive20i M Sport