Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Specific discussion about the E89 2009 Z4 (sDrive35is, sDrive35i, sDrive30i, sDrive23i)
User avatar
BeemerGuy
Member
Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 10:06 am

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by BeemerGuy » Mon Mar 02, 2020 4:49 pm

Hi All,

I realise this has been covered already at length at times but thought I'd ask as I wasn't quite sure of the 18" front 19" rear story, and also wanted the latest opinions.

I have the 326 M sports 19" front and back on a 2016 e89 S20i. They came with Bridgestone Potenza RFTs 255/30 91Y.

I assume the 18", 19" therefore does not apply to me as these are already upgraded wheels? Is there normally a wheel size difference on standards?

If I look at replacement tyres should I go for Michelin Pilot Sport 4s 255/35?….any specific variant, or is there something even better/better VFM?

Many thanks,
BeemerGuy
S20i Auto Mineral Grey
Racechip GTS + App
330 front brakes, Hel SS hoses
326M Michelin PS4S
Xenon AEs
Smart Top
Black Leather Heated
Comfort Pack, Pro Media

Rassi
Member
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 10:20 pm
Location: Belgium

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by Rassi » Mon Mar 02, 2020 5:24 pm

Your wheels will be staggered, meaning that the rears are wider than the fronts. So the tyres currently on will be 225/35/19 and 255/30/19, front/rear. I am ditching the Bridgestone RFT myself, and will put PS4S on in 235/35/19 and 265/30/19, but this is subject to much debate. 255/35/19 rears is also an option.
‘21 BMW X5 M50i
Gone:
BMW: Z3 M Coupe, E39 M5, E60 M5, E92 M3, Z4 Coupe, F10 M5, X5 M50D, F31 335D, Z4 35iS,
G31 540i, X3M, F90 M5, X3M, X5 40d
MB: C43 AMG
Audi: A6 BiTDI Avant
Alfa Romeo: 164 V6 24V, Giulia Quadrifoglio

User avatar
BeemerGuy
Member
Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 10:06 am

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by BeemerGuy » Mon Mar 02, 2020 5:48 pm

Thanks - I just checked and you're spot on: 225/35/19 and 255/30/19, front/rear as you said.

The 265/30/19 vs 255/35/19 debate is whether they are strictly insurable as the 265/30/19 size is potentially outwith tolerance more or less?

And you will go with an repair and inflation kit/compressor as an alternative to a space saver?
S20i Auto Mineral Grey
Racechip GTS + App
330 front brakes, Hel SS hoses
326M Michelin PS4S
Xenon AEs
Smart Top
Black Leather Heated
Comfort Pack, Pro Media

Leek78
Member
Member
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 7:08 am

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by Leek78 » Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:54 am

my M326 rear wheel is cracked so I have brought some after market wheel but are 9j in the front and 10j in the rear, so up by .5j all round. The recommended tyre size for these is 235/35/19 and 265/30/19 respectively. But tempted to run 265/35/19 or 275/30/19 or 275/35/19 on the rear
2012 2.0 white S drive M sport, 19'' 9J & 10J M5 343 replicas, Diamond grill, i-drive, Stage 1, stubby, :thumbsup:

User avatar
R.E92
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1644
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:10 am

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by R.E92 » Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:16 am

Leek78 wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:54 am my M326 rear wheel is cracked so I have brought some after market wheel but are 9j in the front and 10j in the rear, so up by .5j all round. The recommended tyre size for these is 235/35/19 and 265/30/19 respectively. But tempted to run 265/35/19 or 275/30/19 or 275/35/19 on the rear
That's an increase of 1j. You need to check the offsets of those wheels, there's not much room to spare at those widths.

Leek78
Member
Member
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 7:08 am

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by Leek78 » Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:40 am

et35 front and et38 rear's
2012 2.0 white S drive M sport, 19'' 9J & 10J M5 343 replicas, Diamond grill, i-drive, Stage 1, stubby, :thumbsup:

Pickster
Member
Member
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:30 am
Location: West Yorkshire

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by Pickster » Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:57 am

Leek78 wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:54 am my M326 rear wheel is cracked so I have brought some after market wheel but are 9j in the front and 10j in the rear, so up by .5j all round. The recommended tyre size for these is 235/35/19 and 265/30/19 respectively. But tempted to run 265/35/19 or 275/30/19 or 275/35/19 on the rear
Hi I thought the 326's were 8J & 9J so your up by 1 all round. I've got my eye on some 437's which are the same as your replacements 9J & 10J they have 255/35/19 & 275/35/19 so you should be fine with your temptations.

Pickster
Member
Member
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:30 am
Location: West Yorkshire

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by Pickster » Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:09 am

Good Point with the offsets I was assuming you were staying with the 29 & 40 as the 326's

User avatar
R.E92
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1644
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:10 am

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by R.E92 » Tue Mar 03, 2020 4:22 pm

Pickster wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:57 am Hi I thought the 326's were 8J & 9J so your up by 1 all round. I've got my eye on some 437's which are the same as your replacements 9J & 10J they have 255/35/19 & 275/35/19 so you should be fine with your temptations.
Assuming those are genuine 437M wheels your fronts will rub a little with those tyres, go with 245/35r19 if you have a choice.

User avatar
R.E92
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1644
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:10 am

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by R.E92 » Tue Mar 03, 2020 4:26 pm

Leek78 wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:40 am et35 front and et38 rear's
They should be OK. The 235 front tyres are a bit skinny for a 9J wheel though, that's right at the minimum.

Leek78
Member
Member
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 7:08 am

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by Leek78 » Tue Mar 03, 2020 4:30 pm

so its looking like the consensus is, front go for 245/35/19 on the 9j et29, and 275/35/19 on the 10j et38
2012 2.0 white S drive M sport, 19'' 9J & 10J M5 343 replicas, Diamond grill, i-drive, Stage 1, stubby, :thumbsup:

User avatar
mr wilks
Legend
Legend
Posts: 21897
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:02 pm
Location: Lancashire

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by mr wilks » Tue Mar 03, 2020 6:57 pm

Leek78 wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2020 4:30 pm so its looking like the consensus is, front go for 245/35/19 on the 9j et29, and 275/35/19 on the 10j et38
IThe rear you propose could rub on arch trim in the bends or compression if you drove spiritedly compression :cry: feel or look at the arch liner , its protrudes down with a defined lip :( silly design for no apparent reason .
On those numbers i'd be thinking 265 35 or 275 30 unless another member has the same 10j et38 & can confirm for sure .
3 ZMRs
3 E89s
5 Si coupes
5 Si roadsters
997 C4
TTRS
F82 M4
MK7 Golf Gti
current Bmw 6 Gran Turismo

User avatar
BeemerGuy
Member
Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 10:06 am

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by BeemerGuy » Wed Mar 11, 2020 1:19 pm

You guys knowz tyres, I'm trying to follow....I'm assuming 9j is really 19" and the et29 is the distance from hub to edge....is that a standard distance for 326 without spacers (i assume no spacers is standard?)?

If I went for Michelin pS4 235/35 fronts and 255/35 rear I assume that would be fine... what I might be missing from the 265/30 rears would be a bit of extra width, and they'd be higher....
So the extra hight would give extra comfort, but I'd have less rubber on the road (and not look as cool), and also avoid some potential rub?

Have I understood correctly...I'm afraid I'm only a secret petrolhead wannabe...thanks.
S20i Auto Mineral Grey
Racechip GTS + App
330 front brakes, Hel SS hoses
326M Michelin PS4S
Xenon AEs
Smart Top
Black Leather Heated
Comfort Pack, Pro Media

Leek78
Member
Member
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 7:08 am

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by Leek78 » Wed Mar 11, 2020 1:43 pm

9j is the wheel width, 9j = 9 inches, 10j = 10 inches. You're right on the "ET" being the offset from the wheel centre line to the hub face. 265/30 will give a little extra tyre wall height. But as youre running 255/35 its the best option on std wheels.
2012 2.0 white S drive M sport, 19'' 9J & 10J M5 343 replicas, Diamond grill, i-drive, Stage 1, stubby, :thumbsup:

User avatar
enuff_zed
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 14702
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:05 am
Location: Attleborough, Norfolk

326 M sport alloy - alternatives to RFTs

Post by enuff_zed » Wed Mar 11, 2020 1:57 pm

Leek78 wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2020 1:43 pm 9j is the wheel width, 9j = 9 inches, 10j = 10 inches. You're right on the "ET" being the offset from the wheel centre line to the hub face. 265/30 will give a little extra tyre wall height. But as youre running 255/35 its the best option on std wheels.
And I believe I'm right in saying the 'J' measurement is across the inner faces? In other words, the width the tyre has to fill.
HQ of 'Norfolk Zed Rescue'.
Always happy to help if I can.

If the forum helped you, why not help the forum back. Thats the Z4 way! :thumbsup:
Image

Post Reply