Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Specific discussion about the E89 2009 Z4 (sDrive35is, sDrive35i, sDrive30i, sDrive23i)
User avatar
mr wilks
Legend
Legend
Posts: 21897
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:02 pm
Location: Lancashire

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by mr wilks » Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:14 pm

Nice to see the 4 potters standing together :P
I can see me trying one out in the not too distant future , remapped of course :driving:
3 ZMRs
3 E89s
5 Si coupes
5 Si roadsters
997 C4
TTRS
F82 M4
MK7 Golf Gti
current Bmw 6 Gran Turismo

User avatar
jabber
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 3138
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:23 am
Location: Hampshire

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by jabber » Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:18 pm

Just get which one that you prefer to own everyone has their own preferences for me there is no right or wrong choice, personally I prefer the 6 cylinder 3.0 but also would have a 4 pot if I did more mileage in it :thumbsup:
Z less again
14 E89 Z4 2.0 msport grey gone now
10 E89 Z4 3.0 Black auto now. Very sadly gone
Gone 04 E85 z4 3.0 Maldives blue smg

john-e89
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 11077
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:27 pm

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by john-e89 » Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:24 pm

If you’ve not had a DCT box before, which would make you ‘need’ a 35i or is, then 4 pot turbo seems the best choice.....get that blower spooling like a hooked Marlin on speed.... :P
M roady...OEM CSL’s, strut brace, Remus back boxes, ZHP
MR2 MK 2
E89 35i project car...mapped 365bhp, M4 stoppers & wheels, KWV3’s, H&R front ARB, M3 front arms, strut brace Eisenmann cat back race exhaust, VRSF downpipes inbound
E89 35is
G29

Pbondar

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by Pbondar » Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:34 pm

john-e89 wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:24 pm If you’ve not had a DCT box before, which would make you ‘need’ a 35i or is, then 4 pot turbo seems the best choice.....get that blower spooling like a hooked Marlin on speed.... :P
The 8 speed ZF box on the 18/20/28 is a marmite issue...you can pooh pooh it if you haven’t tried it, and even if you have tried it, until you have explored all the options it offers to engage you you can’t reach a balanced judgement imho... :tumbleweed:

For sure the speed it changes gears (sub 200ms), the option for downshifts from say 6 to 2 direct and the sports mode plus manual mode when mated to the hard charging versions of the N20 (240bhp+) means it is the way to go... :driving:

It’s a long long way from a Ford 3 speed slushmatic... :thumbsup:

User avatar
R.E92
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1644
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:10 am

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by R.E92 » Wed Sep 05, 2018 8:30 am

warmasice wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 5:35 pm
R.E92 wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:51 am
Smartbear wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 11:09 pm

No reason a petrolhead wouldn’t like the 4pot, you’ve missed out it’s attributes of lighter weight giving improved handling & being able to out-perform the 30i with just a small tweak.
It’s far from being just a nice looking car that doesn’t cost too much to run :poke:
Rob
It seems the N20 engine is only 10kg lighter than the N52 engine. I don't think anyone is going to notice any handling benefits with the removal of 10kg from the front.

The fact the N20 has a turbo and tuning potential is a plus for the engine. Tuning potential was one of the reasons I went for the 35i, but then the 35i also has the bonus of being a nice smooth 6. If I had to sacrifice either power or cylinders from my engine, I'd lose the power all day. I enjoy the noise of the straight 6 even when the car is plodding along in traffic or sat at lights, not just when high in the rev range.
There's a 110kg difference. I guess only true petrolheads can feel the difference though. :poke:
Googling the N52 engine weight gives me 148kg, the N20 comes out as 138kg. Nice try adding 100kg though :wink:

User avatar
R.E92
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1644
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:10 am

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by R.E92 » Wed Sep 05, 2018 8:46 am

Twin Turbo wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 7:39 pm Well someone who had a 28i and tracked it, can tell you from my experience and stock 35is is no way capable than my old car. I had a few encounters with 35is - and loved the sound - but quite floppy and around mid-corner.

On a B road - My 28i would left every 35i/35is and even 135i (m-light) for dust. However, on an open A road was you can get stupid speeds, they be on my tail trying to overtake. Until the next hard break and sweeping corners.

It would enter and exit the corner slower, however, have the legs on the straights

Some one having a 28i makes me not a petrol head, sorry disagree - As I went to the next evolution and having an M2.

The first M3 E30 car was an 4 pot 2.3 Ltr - this, not a petrol head car? - it was an Ikonic car

Its everyone has different needs and requirements - this forum 4 years ago was full of biggets and slayted anyone with an 4-pot - saying it was not an true BMW. And over the last two years, it has become a more welcoming forum. With the increased number of 4-pot owners joining the forum.

I could say, if you dont do track days and track your car your not an petrol head - but thats not true.

As I am aware the fastest car doing the 1/4 mile in the UK is an N20 28i - not an 35is.

Regarding engine issues, the N20 is a popular engine - and I owned my car and achieved just under 40K miles - and no engine issues. The N20 is no more reliable or less reliable than an N54. As I had an 335i and had to have HPFP replaced under warranty.

Please guys, keep moving forward, and not coming out with rubbish statements.
You mean statements like "the fastest car doing the 1/4 mile in the UK is an N20 28i - not an 35is"?
Why did you bother going to the M2 if you could have a N20 equipped 220i (which in your world is the faster car :wink: )

We're not even comparing to the 35i here. The discussion is regards to the N52 vs the N20 and whether the trade-off of two cylinders in exchange for a turbo is noteworthy. My opinion is that inherent traits of an inline 6 engine, such as better engine balance and noise, are what make it the petrolheads choice. If those two traits are not of value to the OP then it makes sense to go out any buy the N20 car.

The N20 is tuneable and has better economy figures. It's not quite as reliable as the N52 but the Z4 as a whole has its fair share of problems.

I expected all the 4pot owners to get upset as people always want to defend their purchase choices.

User avatar
Smartbear
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 13685
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:54 pm
Location: a barn in Somerset

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by Smartbear » Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:41 am

R.E92 wrote: Wed Sep 05, 2018 8:46 am
Twin Turbo wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 7:39 pm Well someone who had a 28i and tracked it, can tell you from my experience and stock 35is is no way capable than my old car. I had a few encounters with 35is - and loved the sound - but quite floppy and around mid-corner.

On a B road - My 28i would left every 35i/35is and even 135i (m-light) for dust. However, on an open A road was you can get stupid speeds, they be on my tail trying to overtake. Until the next hard break and sweeping corners.

It would enter and exit the corner slower, however, have the legs on the straights

Some one having a 28i makes me not a petrol head, sorry disagree - As I went to the next evolution and having an M2.

The first M3 E30 car was an 4 pot 2.3 Ltr - this, not a petrol head car? - it was an Ikonic car

Its everyone has different needs and requirements - this forum 4 years ago was full of biggets and slayted anyone with an 4-pot - saying it was not an true BMW. And over the last two years, it has become a more welcoming forum. With the increased number of 4-pot owners joining the forum.

I could say, if you dont do track days and track your car your not an petrol head - but thats not true.

As I am aware the fastest car doing the 1/4 mile in the UK is an N20 28i - not an 35is.

Regarding engine issues, the N20 is a popular engine - and I owned my car and achieved just under 40K miles - and no engine issues. The N20 is no more reliable or less reliable than an N54. As I had an 335i and had to have HPFP replaced under warranty.

Please guys, keep moving forward, and not coming out with rubbish statements.
You mean statements like "the fastest car doing the 1/4 mile in the UK is an N20 28i - not an 35is"?
Why did you bother going to the M2 if you could have a N20 equipped 220i (which in your world is the faster car :wink: )

We're not even comparing to the 35i here. The discussion is regards to the N52 vs the N20 and whether the trade-off of two cylinders in exchange for a turbo is noteworthy. My opinion is that inherent traits of an inline 6 engine, such as better engine balance and noise, are what make it the petrolheads choice. If those two traits are not of value to the OP then it makes sense to go out any buy the N20 car.

The N20 is tuneable and has better economy figures. It's not quite as reliable as the N52 but the Z4 as a whole has its fair share of problems.

I expected all the 4pot owners to get upset as people always want to defend their purchase choices.
No one here begrudges a difference of opinion, it’s when you compared the 20i to a diesel TT that you crossed the line-that’s just insulting :roll:
Rob
Image

e89 Sdrive 20i, plenty of mumbo & good economy-the thinking bears z4
e89 Sdrive 30i, this ones busted, pass me another...
e85 3.0si sold

User avatar
R.E92
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1644
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:10 am

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by R.E92 » Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:53 am

Smartbear wrote: Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:41 am No one here begrudges a difference of opinion, it’s when you compared the 20i to a diesel TT that you crossed the line-that’s just insulting :roll:
Rob
Can't resist a little wind-up! :poke:

User avatar
Twin Turbo
Member
Member
Posts: 722
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:48 pm

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by Twin Turbo » Wed Sep 05, 2018 8:58 pm

lol - I love :fuelfire: and getting bites

However, I agree that an N52 is a bulletproof engine - as I confirmed in my first post.

And you mentioned 35i as a reference point,

The M2 is a quick car, but an M4 is quicker - if you are a A road warrior - as anyone can drive fast in a straight line - is that why you have an 35i :rofl:

TONYL
Member
Member
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:36 am

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by TONYL » Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:15 pm

If your a petrol head then the 6 pot 3 litre
If your a hairdresser then the 4 pot will be ok
😜😜😜
318ci m sport coupe
3.0i z4 e89

User avatar
Smartbear
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 13685
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:54 pm
Location: a barn in Somerset

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by Smartbear » Thu Sep 06, 2018 2:40 pm

TONYL wrote: Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:15 pm If your a petrol head then the 6 pot 3 litre
If your a hairdresser then the 4 pot will be ok
😜😜😜
So your car handles worse & is also slower?
I’ll just have a trim please :poke:
Rob
Image

e89 Sdrive 20i, plenty of mumbo & good economy-the thinking bears z4
e89 Sdrive 30i, this ones busted, pass me another...
e85 3.0si sold

User avatar
RustyZ4
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 3622
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:23 pm
Location: Maidstone, Kent

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by RustyZ4 » Thu Sep 06, 2018 5:42 pm

TONYL wrote: Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:15 pm If your a petrol head then the 6 pot 3 litre
If your a hairdresser then the 4 pot will be ok
😜😜😜
See from your sig, you have a 318ci coupe,, just remind me how many pots it has :rofl:
Z4 Mineral Grey, 28i MSport Auto, lots of goodies
Z4 E85 3.0, gone but now with son :D
Growing Old is Mandatory But Growing Up is Optional

TONYL
Member
Member
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:36 am

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by TONYL » Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:49 pm

Yes..thats the wifes..and shes a hairdresser! Ha ha!
Ruffled a few on this one!
318ci m sport coupe
3.0i z4 e89

User avatar
Smartbear
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 13685
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:54 pm
Location: a barn in Somerset

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by Smartbear » Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:54 pm

TONYL wrote: Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:49 pm Yes..thats the wifes..and shes a hairdresser! Ha ha!
Ruffled a few on this one!
I’m not ruffled Tony, I’d even wait for you to catch up on a run :poke:
Rob
Image

e89 Sdrive 20i, plenty of mumbo & good economy-the thinking bears z4
e89 Sdrive 30i, this ones busted, pass me another...
e85 3.0si sold

User avatar
Mr Tidy
Legend
Legend
Posts: 23842
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:18 pm
Location: North West Surrey

Z4 2.8i vs 3.0i

Post by Mr Tidy » Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:18 pm

TONYL wrote: Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:49 pm Yes..thats the wifes..and shes a hairdresser! Ha ha!
Brilliant! :lol: Shame it isn't a convertible though!
Coupes because stunning!
Current - Silver Grey MC, Imola Red heated Nappa & carbon trim. Aeros, H & R Coil-overs, 224s, OE Strut brace, Nav, cup-holders, DSP Hi-Fi, pdc, cruise, MFSW, no CDV! E90 330i daily
Gone - Montego Blue
Gone - Ruby Black

Post Reply