That's a really kind offer - thanks.
I'll PM you about it!
That's a really kind offer - thanks.
Interested in your feedback on this Gents. Is the M steering markedly better than the standard Si?
Honestly, it's really subjective. The problem is when they EPAS starts to fail, you end up having to deal with so many problems that it makes most people steer clear of using it ever again. Because the system used on the E85/86's is actually so out dated, it's more trouble that it's worth.
I think mostly due to timing. The m cars that had the s54 all had hydraulic and the Z4 was BMWs first electric system. To be fair for a first attempt it ain’t bad! But the hydraulic system I have added as said. Just feels right. It’s very had to say just what it is? But it’s something and very noticeable!AlpinaZ4 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 11:09 am I've been following this thread with interest.
Over the past 5 years I've driven around 70k km in 3.0Si Coupes and around 50k km in Z4M Coupes. Suspension varieties ranging from bone-stock, Bilstein B12, H&R Monotube and KW V3. Now back in a 3.0Si Coupe as daily driver and general fun car.
DaveD captures the essence of issues with Z4 EPAS quite well. The Z4M just feels "meatier" and linear. As family car we currently have an E90 3-series and in the same manner it just feels "right" when driven back to back with the Z4 3.0Si. It's exactly why I'm considering a hydraulic steering conversion.
My consideration would be this... why would BMW go through the effort of hydraulic steering for the Z4M if there weren't concrete benefits in doing so?
Well it isn't exactly good.Machine monkey wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 3:24 pm I think mostly due to timing. The m cars that had the s54 all had hydraulic and the Z4 was BMWs first electric system. To be fair for a first attempt it ain’t bad! But the hydraulic system I have added as said. Just feels right. It’s very had to say just what it is? But it’s something and very noticeable!