Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

2003 - 2009, roadster, coupe, facelift
User avatar
un1eash
Member
Member
Posts: 973
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 7:26 pm

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by un1eash » Sat May 16, 2009 3:57 pm

I test drove one the same day as the Z4, cant believe i was actually thinking MX5 or Z4.

Mik
Member
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:22 pm
Location: Colchester Essex

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by Mik » Sat May 16, 2009 4:00 pm

ksher wrote:
un1eash wrote:The engine in the 2.0l is british built aswell :thumbsup:

I think its a great little engine, just enough power and performs well in the twistys. Compared to the 2.0l in the MX-5 sport and its awesome, the MX-5 sounds like a diesel.
I hate MX5. :rofl:
I hated my 2.0 sport 07 plate so much I sold it back to Mazda after 7 weeks at a huge loss after just buying it brand new from them !

User avatar
ksher
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 4335
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Bedfordshire

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by ksher » Sat May 16, 2009 4:09 pm

Mik wrote:
ksher wrote:
un1eash wrote:The engine in the 2.0l is british built aswell :thumbsup:

I think its a great little engine, just enough power and performs well in the twistys. Compared to the 2.0l in the MX-5 sport and its awesome, the MX-5 sounds like a diesel.
I hate MX5. :rofl:
I hated my 2.0 sport 07 plate so much I sold it back to Mazda after 7 weeks at a huge loss after just buying it brand new from them !
Was it because of the cheap looking interior? Why was it so bad?
Current BMW: 640d Gran Coupe M Sport (F06), 118d SE (F20).
Previous BMW: Z4 sDrive23i M Sport (E89), 318i Sport (F30), 120d SE (F20), Z4 2.5i Sport Roadster (E85), 523i Sport (E60), 323Ci (E46), 523i SE (E39), 318i (E36).

Mik
Member
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:22 pm
Location: Colchester Essex

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by Mik » Sat May 16, 2009 4:29 pm

Yep the cheap interior. the way the drivers footwell for RHD cars is really cramped and your legs are pushed to the right and offset (although Japan are RHD there biggest market is going to be LHD so they design to favour that) Also the hand brake dug into your left leg if you were nt one for keeping your foot on the footrest left of the clutch. They sit too high. The carpet looks like a piece of felt and aircon was an extra.... Oh... and the sales guy was a To55er

User avatar
paddy wright
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 7664
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:00 pm
Location: south yorkshire

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by paddy wright » Sat May 16, 2009 4:37 pm

Mik wrote:Yep the cheap interior. the way the drivers footwell for RHD cars is really cramped and your legs are pushed to the right and offset (although Japan are RHD there biggest market is going to be LHD so they design to favour that) Also the hand brake dug into your left leg if you were nt one for keeping your foot on the footrest left of the clutch. They sit too high. The carpet looks like a piece of felt and aircon was an extra.... Oh... and the sales guy was a To55er
so y did u buy it then?
Z4 2.2 sterling grey,Msport seats,retrofit cupholders,cruise,footwell lights,sound gen and mfsw,18"ellipsoids,xenons+light washers,ZHPknob,folding mirrors,3"stubby,update wheel caps,gateway300 ipod, wind deflector to keep the wife happy!

User avatar
ksher
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 4335
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Bedfordshire

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by ksher » Sat May 16, 2009 4:39 pm

Mik wrote:Yep the cheap interior. the way the drivers footwell for RHD cars is really cramped and your legs are pushed to the right and offset (although Japan are RHD there biggest market is going to be LHD so they design to favour that) Also the hand brake dug into your left leg if you were nt one for keeping your foot on the footrest left of the clutch. They sit too high. The carpet looks like a piece of felt and aircon was an extra.... Oh... and the sales guy was a To55er
I can only say most Japanese cars are reliable. Very few have performance (GTR, Evo). But they all have cheap plastic interior. And their exterior and interior design cannot be matched with German and Italian. I will never buy Japanese/Korean motors. :rofl:
Current BMW: 640d Gran Coupe M Sport (F06), 118d SE (F20).
Previous BMW: Z4 sDrive23i M Sport (E89), 318i Sport (F30), 120d SE (F20), Z4 2.5i Sport Roadster (E85), 523i Sport (E60), 323Ci (E46), 523i SE (E39), 318i (E36).

Mik
Member
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:22 pm
Location: Colchester Essex

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by Mik » Sat May 16, 2009 4:43 pm

paddy wright wrote:
Mik wrote:Yep the cheap interior. the way the drivers footwell for RHD cars is really cramped and your legs are pushed to the right and offset (although Japan are RHD there biggest market is going to be LHD so they design to favour that) Also the hand brake dug into your left leg if you were nt one for keeping your foot on the footrest left of the clutch. They sit too high. The carpet looks like a piece of felt and aircon was an extra.... Oh... and the sales guy was a To55er
so y did u buy it then?
Good question ! I think it was because I had a Mk 1 and that was my starter roadster and had fond memories of it. Plus I had an ageing Boxster that still had enough money in it to swap foa brand new MX5 so that was the lure

User avatar
ksher
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 4335
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Bedfordshire

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by ksher » Sat May 16, 2009 4:52 pm

Mik wrote:
paddy wright wrote:
Mik wrote:Yep the cheap interior. the way the drivers footwell for RHD cars is really cramped and your legs are pushed to the right and offset (although Japan are RHD there biggest market is going to be LHD so they design to favour that) Also the hand brake dug into your left leg if you were nt one for keeping your foot on the footrest left of the clutch. They sit too high. The carpet looks like a piece of felt and aircon was an extra.... Oh... and the sales guy was a To55er
so y did u buy it then?
Good question ! I think it was because I had a Mk 1 and that was my starter roadster and had fond memories of it. Plus I had an ageing Boxster that still had enough money in it to swap foa brand new MX5 so that was the lure
I would rather have the ageing Boxster. Proper driver car. :) New car is nothing if it is rubblish.
Current BMW: 640d Gran Coupe M Sport (F06), 118d SE (F20).
Previous BMW: Z4 sDrive23i M Sport (E89), 318i Sport (F30), 120d SE (F20), Z4 2.5i Sport Roadster (E85), 523i Sport (E60), 323Ci (E46), 523i SE (E39), 318i (E36).

User avatar
un1eash
Member
Member
Posts: 973
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 7:26 pm

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by un1eash » Sat May 16, 2009 7:12 pm

I too found the MX-5 very cramped on the drivers side, the interior wasnt that bad though i thort. Wind noise was bad at anything above 50 and having a manual roof was abit pants. I test drove a fully kitted 2.0l sport and it felt very harsh over the bumps and the steering is very heavy at low speeds compared to the Z4.

User avatar
WLH
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 12277
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 2:08 am
Location: Taxsylvania
Contact:

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by WLH » Sat May 16, 2009 8:44 pm

Spikey, welcome to the forum... :thumbsup:
2007 ///M Roadster - My Zed's - Member ZSCCA - ///M Registry - My Videos
Image

User avatar
Spikey
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1410
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 8:42 am
Location: Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by Spikey » Sat May 16, 2009 11:36 pm

Hey guys thanks for the comments and support
The first thing I did was get rid of the run flats, put a set of BM 18" split rims on and some pirelli 35 profiles, this has made a difference, the only slight problem is that it tramlines on poor roads (not a big problem)
I would like to put the ac split rear spoiler on, I think it's really cool - has anyone done one of these, is it easy enough.

Thanks again

:thumbsup:

User avatar
deagle
Member
Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:39 pm

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by deagle » Sun May 17, 2009 8:35 am

So what did you do with the old Run Flats.. were they worn out or did you just chuck them away ? I don't find them too bad on my 2.0 sport.

Biggest problem with the MX... which I did look at seriously, was that they ruined the handling in the current model - something that is reckoned to be fixed in the recent facelift. I also had a ist gen MX5 with the popup headlights - lovely little car.
2.0i Edition Sport (Individual Leather seats and interior, 108s, MSport steering wheel, MSport suspension). Wind Deflector. Comfort Pack. Heated Seats. Ext Dimming mirrors

Mik
Member
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:22 pm
Location: Colchester Essex

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by Mik » Sun May 17, 2009 9:26 am

deagle wrote:So what did you do with the old Run Flats.. were they worn out or did you just chuck them away ? I don't find them too bad on my 2.0 sport.

Biggest problem with the MX... which I did look at seriously, was that they ruined the handling in the current model - something that is reckoned to be fixed in the recent facelift. I also had a ist gen MX5 with the popup headlights - lovely little car.
Totally agree with that deagle,my first roadster was a pop up headlight MX and was so chuffed with it. Kept it three and a half years before getting an MR2 roadster

sammyz
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2870
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:49 pm
Location: Merseyside

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by sammyz » Sun May 17, 2009 10:00 am

At present the last of the Z4 2 litres can be had for similar money to a new MX5 sport. I like the MX5 especially now they have sorted the ride height out but the engine feels gutless compared to the Z4. The interior on the BMW is miles ahead and there's that badge :)

Should be a no brainer!
Yas Marina Blue 35i.

DannyBoy
Member
Member
Posts: 716
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 10:33 pm
Location: South Manchester

Re: z4 2.0 Sport - Opinions & Performance

Post by DannyBoy » Sun May 17, 2009 10:13 am

Problem is, and what is a potentially big attraction in some people's eye, the Z4 is an "old" model now with the arrival of the new car whereas the Mazda (platic like as it is!) is a current shape car. The Mazda also has the pedigree in terms of being a 2 seater sports car and on this basis will appeal to the more mature buyer dreaming of wind in the hair motoring.

That said, I'd had niether a 2.0 Z4 nor a MX5 and would spend the money on something more performance based whether that be new or used. :thumbsup:
2004-2005: "04" Saph 2.2i; 2007-2010: "05" Tit 3.0i; 2010-2012: "08" Audi TTR;
2012+ "MY13" Audi TTC TFSi S-line Black with 19s and lots of toys

Post Reply