Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

GTS 4.0L

Discussion of other cars non-Z4
griffnut
Member
Member
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 11:37 am
Location: Northants

GTS 4.0L

Post by griffnut » Wed Sep 30, 2020 8:20 pm

That's just what Harry Metcalfe said on you tube. The perfect Boxster.

Angelus666
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2257
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: Essex
Contact:

GTS 4.0L

Post by Angelus666 » Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:58 pm

john-e89 wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 4:47 pm
Angelus666 wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 4:34 pm I've had my 981 GTS for a few months now and it's an epic car that is brilliant in so many ways. Being completely honest, and as much as I love the M, if you guys want a proper sports car then the 981 Boxster is so much better than the Z4M it's not really even comparable. I have only added 200 miles on my MC in the last 3 months, which says a lot :?

I'd expect the 4.0 to be better than my 981 in every way apart from the sound. Although you can spec these to £85k fairly easily.
Ah now then, read my mind a bit here. In the cold light of day and being completely non emotional, is there really any need for a Boxster when you have an M..? Wait wait.... :lol: Throw on some quality coil overs, new bushes, RTAB’s, Vibratech mounts etc, etc, on an M, Remus boxes if you have any....which you now don’t.... :P or similar, and you have a hell of a good car for two thirds or so less than a GTS. Is it really good enough to outweigh the savings...?
Ha, well this is the dilemma all M car owners face....and if I didn't have the GTS I'd have thought like this, but the M even with £15k work of mods wouldn't live with a standard 981 S. We've all had M cars here and let's be honest, the ride is appalling, even if you stick it on coilovers it's still terrible, the chassis whilst stiff, isn't compliant enough for UK roads. I don't want to come across as a porsche fanboy....and I really love M cars, but the 981 is better in every single way to the ZM.

The only thing that is better in the BMW is the indicator stalk quality. I'm being serious.

User avatar
pvr
Legend
Legend
Posts: 26268
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: South East UK

GTS 4.0L

Post by pvr » Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:10 pm

That is Mrs PVR’s view as well, the M she could not do journeys in whilst the Porsche comfort level is great. I don’t have much of an issue with the M ride quality but the Porsche is a lot easier to live with on U.K. roads.

I do leave the suspension setting generally on the comfort setting though unless when driving abroad.
Current:
911-50 Black - unique spec
X5M - 575 hp of fun in a V8
Abarth 595 Comp.
Golf Clipper - collectors item
Z4 3.0si Black Sapphire
VW ID.3

Previous:
Z4M Silver Grey - non flimper spec (gone to Bing)
Z4 3.0 Toledo

User avatar
LeeZ4MR
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 4206
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2012 2:36 pm
Location: Lincs

GTS 4.0L

Post by LeeZ4MR » Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:17 pm

Angelus666 wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:58 pm We've all had M cars here and let's be honest, the ride is appalling, even if you stick it on coilovers it's still terrible, the chassis whilst stiff, isn't compliant enough for UK roads.
That was my main gripe with mine to be fair as well, and I certainly appreciate your honesty for sure. :thumbsup:
Current...BMW F82 M4 Coupe 2018
370Z Roadster 2011
Merc GLE400d 2022
Caterham 7 2002

Previous...
640d 2012
330i 2006
Z4MR 2006
E92 M3 2009
X5 4.8iS 2004
TVR Cerbera 4.5

john-e89
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 11079
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:27 pm

GTS 4.0L

Post by john-e89 » Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:14 am

pvr wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:10 pm That is Mrs PVR’s view as well, the M she could not do journeys in whilst the Porsche comfort level is great. I don’t have much of an issue with the M ride quality but the Porsche is a lot easier to live with on U.K. roads.

I do leave the suspension setting generally on the comfort setting though unless when driving abroad.
Your M was 100% standard though Paul. To be fair neither of you tried a modded one no....?
M roady...OEM CSL’s, strut brace, Remus back boxes, ZHP
MR2 MK 2
E89 35i project car...mapped 365bhp, M4 stoppers & wheels, KWV3’s, H&R front ARB, M3 front arms, strut brace Eisenmann cat back race exhaust, VRSF downpipes inbound
E89 35is
G29

john-e89
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 11079
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:27 pm

GTS 4.0L

Post by john-e89 » Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:22 am

LeeZ4MR wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:17 pm
Angelus666 wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:58 pm We've all had M cars here and let's be honest, the ride is appalling, even if you stick it on coilovers it's still terrible, the chassis whilst stiff, isn't compliant enough for UK roads.
That was my main gripe with mine to be fair as well, and I certainly appreciate your honesty for sure. :thumbsup:
There are coil overs and there are coil overs though Angelus. KW’s have lots of adjustment for bump and rebound etc, and good quality springs as you’ll know with softer poundage AFAIK here, top notch quality units, not some cheap bouncy £200 jobbies. Obvs you’ll never make it as flat and neutral as a Porsche, but I can’t help thinking you’ll get a car that will satisfy 90% of it. Having said that I’ve never been in a modded one so I’m going on reviews of owners with this set up etc. Exdos for example once said he wouldn’t have an M on standard suspension, but he loves his coupe on AC Schnitzer units I think he’s got. Then you have the S54....no more needs saying there right...? :lol:

Anyway good news you find the 981 the dogs...I guess we’ll find out after a winter rebuild on my M...KW’s etc, ready to go on....
M roady...OEM CSL’s, strut brace, Remus back boxes, ZHP
MR2 MK 2
E89 35i project car...mapped 365bhp, M4 stoppers & wheels, KWV3’s, H&R front ARB, M3 front arms, strut brace Eisenmann cat back race exhaust, VRSF downpipes inbound
E89 35is
G29

Post Reply